Congress MPs withdraw CJI impeachment petition


New Delhi, May 8 (IANS): A petition by two Congress MPs against Rajya Sabha Chairman M. Venkaiah Naidu's rejection of an impeachment motion against Supreme Court Chief Justice Dipak Misra was withdrawn on Tuesday.

Senior counsel Kapil Sibal, appearing for the MPs, withdrew the petition after the five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Justice A.K. Sikri asked him to argue the main matter challenging Naidu's order on merits.

They did not agree to his plea for a copy of the administrative order which led to the bench being set up on Monday.

Rajya Sabha members Pratap Singh Bajwa and Amee Yajnik had moved the top court challenging Chairman Naidu's rejection in April of the notice of motion seeking the removal of Chief Justice Misra.

"You (want) to challenge that (administrative order setting up five-judge bench) for what outcome?" Justice Sikri asked Sibal, who told the bench: "You must say who passed the order. I must have the copy of the order so that I can challenge it."

As Sibal argued that the matter could be referred to a Constitution Bench only by a judicial order and wondered how could it be done by an administrative order, Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel asked if there was a bar on directly referring the matter to a five-judge bench by the latter process.

The bench, also comprising Justice S.A. Bobde, Justice N.V. Ramana, Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel, reminded Sibal that at the outset of the hearing he had said that he has no personal agenda and was for upholding the dignity of the court.

"Will the dignity of the court be jeopardized if you give me that (administrative) order (constituting five judge bench). It is not a secret document under the National Security Act," Sibal countered.

Attorney General K.K. Venugopal, appearing for the Rajya Sabha Chairman, said the Chief Justice had discretionary powers on the administrative side to allocate any matter to any bench of whatever strength.

Venugopal, who questioned the maintainability of the petition by the two Congress lawmakers, said the notice for the motion for the removal of Chief Justice Misra was moved by 64 MPs belonging to seven political parties including Congress but only two of the signatories had moved the court challenging the April 23 decision.

The Attorney General suggested: "Let 50 of the 64 MPs who had moved the notice of removal pass a resolution authorising Bajwa and Yajnik to move the court."

Taking a jibe at Venugopal's argument, Sibal asked why two people could not challenge the decision and asked him if the remaining 62 have told him that they did not support Bajwa and Yajnik.

"I will satisfy you. I will bring 60. You will be satisfied," Sibal told Venugopal.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Dr Mohan Prabhu, LL.D, QC, Mangalore (Kankanady)/Ottawa, Canada

    Wed, May 09 2018

    Not satisfied by disrupting parliamentary proceedings, Rahul is now bent upon disrupting the smooth functioning of the SC by this ridiculous petition.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Bengaluru/Katapadi

    Tue, May 08 2018

    Congress need to be tough and should stop its policy of compromise

    DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Desi Jawan, Mangalore

    Tue, May 08 2018

    Leadership in Congress seems to be immature due the fact that they have got nothing by initiating a move to impeach CJI and when the motion was rejected by the Vice President they further went to Supreme court but there also they failed to gain anything. Rahul Gandhi should now do well to resign from Congress presidentship and pave way for some intelligent leader who can run the affairs of party.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Indian, Mangalore

    Tue, May 08 2018

    It is sad that this bench fixed by the CJI to hear the challenge to rejection of his Impeachment motion, even refused to provide a copy of the adminstrative order by which the bench was constituted! That order could be challenged on the ground that CJI had a conflict of interest

    One of the charges in the Impeachment motion against CJI was that he dealt with medical college case involving him & then fixed bench of Junior judges in that case. Another charge was abusing his power as master of roster to fix benches. Yet he fixed bench in his impeachment case!

    As per Prashant Bhushan

    DisAgree [3] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Tue, May 08 2018

    BJP knows the tricks of the Trade ...

    DisAgree [13] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Congress MPs withdraw CJI impeachment petition



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.