Probe on for church selling 'defence' land for Bengaluru metro


Bengaluru, Sep 1 (IANS): Investigation is underway into the alleged sale of 'defence' land by the Church of South India (CSI) for the Bengaluru metro project and collecting Rs 60 crore compensation," a police official said on Sunday.

"We are inquiring into the Defence Ministry's complaint that the CSI had illegally sold a portion of its land, leased to it over a century ago, for the metro project and collected Rs 60 crore compensation from its operator (BMRCL)," Bengaluru Deputy Commissioner of Police (Central) Chetan Singh Rathore told IANS.

The Cubbon Park police station on August 20 registered an FIR against the CSI for allegedly 'cheating' the defence ministry by selling 7,426 square metres of its land located in the All Saints Church complex to the state-run Bengaluru Metro Rail Corporation Ltd (BMRCL) without its knowledge and consent.

 
Representational photo

"We have asked both the parties to submit us all documents pertaining to the prime land to ascertain its rightful owner, as they (records) date back to 1860s when the city was under the British rule and the Mysuru Wodeyars were the owners of public lands then," said Rathore.

Though the BMRCL is building an underground station beneath the land claimed by the two parties for its second phase of the metro project on the north-south (Nagawara-Gottigere) route, the operator plans to use it for parking and other allied activities.

"As preliminary investigation has also revealed that both the parties have contested the land ownership in a city civil court, we will wait for its outcome before proceeding with the case," added Rathore.

Defending the land purchase from the CSI through its state-run nodal agency - Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB), a BMRCL spokesman said the acquisition and compensation (Rs 60 crore) were paid to the CSI after due diligence and public notice for objections.

"As KIADB is the state-run agency dealing with sale and purchase of lands for industries and infrastructure projects across the southern state, it has vetted the documents the CSI submitted for acquiring it and compensating for it suitably," BMRCL official Y.B.K. Chavan told IANS.

For the 72 km second phase of the metro project in the city connecting with the 43 km first phase on the east-west and the north-south routes, the operator has been acquiring private and public lands across the city with compensation at the market rate and giving transfer development rights (TDR) for those surrendering their properties in the way of the route.

"If the Defence Ministry claims that the land was leased to the CSI in the 1860s, the onus is on it to prove that it was its owner and submit the lease agreement they both would have entered into over 130 years ago" Rathore pointed out.

Questioning the Ministry's ownership claim on the land, a church official said the East India Company was the original owner of all public lands in the city's cantonment area during the British Raj and vast tracts of lands were gifted or donated to social organisations and religious institutions for building community halls, churches, temples, mosques and other places of worship.

"In the 1860s or subsequently till the mid-1940s, where was the Indian government and the defence ministry to claim that the land in the All Saints Church premises belonged to it unless it was an open land and inherited by the transfer of assets from the British regime," the official told IANS on the condition of anonymity.

On its complaint to the police against the CSI, a Defence official said legal action would be taken against the latter for breaching the lease agreement and taking the Rs 60 crore compensation without informing the army sub-area commandant and taking his consent.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • John Tauro, M'lore

    Mon, Sep 02 2019

    Quite possible the land in question belongs to the CSI, the religious organization which was in existence in India during the 19th century. The then rulers, either the British or the Wodeyars might have gifted or leased the land to the CSI. The veracity of the Defence Ministry’s claim is doubtful since the present MOD under the Govt. of India did not exist during that period. In case the land is part of transfer of assets from the British Govt. to the Govt. of India (after independence) then there should be relevant updated records with both the Central and State governments.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mangalurian, Mangaluru

    Mon, Sep 02 2019

    The British officers/Eurasians were members of multiple sects: e.g. Anglican, Congregational, Presbyterian, Methodist, etc.

    Around the time of Independence, the leaders of these denominations in India decided to form a single denomination for their members.

    Within the south of India, the Church of South India was formed as a result. In September 1947, a month after India's Independence.

    So, CSI did not exist 130 years ago. Hence the records with them may not be all that accurate.

    DisAgree Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Af,,, MANGALORE

    Mon, Sep 02 2019

    why three drives in metro train.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mangalurian, Mangaluru

    Mon, Sep 02 2019

    Post the 1857 event, British parliament passed the Government of India Act in 1858, and the East India Company was no more in control.

    In the princely states (and Mysore was one of them), the ownership of the public lands was with the royal house, such as Wodeyars, and not with the British Crown.

    So, if this church came into existence (likely for the British officers working in the Defence at the time) about 130 years ago, the church would have been built either on public land, or on land leased by the Defence department of the time.

    So, in my opinion, there may be some truth in the claims of the Defence department.

    DisAgree [31] Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • sri_elder, Karkala

    Mon, Sep 02 2019

    that makes sense...

    DisAgree [4] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Nashville

    Mon, Sep 02 2019

    Whose Land it is Anyways ...

    DisAgree [8] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Krishna, Udupi

    Mon, Sep 02 2019

    for sure not belongs to who took compensdation

    DisAgree [14] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jai India, Mangalore

    Sun, Sep 01 2019

    This land now belongs to the church which was given / leased legally by Britishers. If the lease agreement was only between Britishers and the church after Britishers left now the beneficiary is the church as there was no other party in lease agreement to stake the claim. Isn't the church been paying property tax on this land to govt of india?. If the church has sold the property now for development purpose to the govt then church must be having all its documents in order with clear title. What defence ministry Rajnath Singh wants from church now???.

    DisAgree [16] Agree [40] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ronald D, Udipi

    Sun, Sep 01 2019

    I have no idea who is right...1860 and now few generations now! Independent according to Churchill too! One thing is true.... hana kandare hena bayi biduthe!

    DisAgree [3] Agree [27] Reply Report Abuse

  • Charles D'Mello, Pangala

    Sun, Sep 01 2019

    What job the so called Government Officer do...!!!!???? Why such claims...!!!???? All the officers and politicians are to be sacked forever and ever.

    DisAgree [6] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Probe on for church selling 'defence' land for Bengaluru metro



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.