Bengaluru: Citing CAA, high court grants bail to 'illegal' Bangladeshi Christian woman


Bengaluru, Jan 29 (IANS): In the backdrop of the provision of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), the Karnataka High Court has granted bail to Bangladeshi Christian woman accused of being an "illegal immigrant".

A single judge bench of Justice John Michael Cunha observed there is prima facie material to show since 2002, the woman has been residing in India. And as a result, she deserves bail in the light of the amended Section 2 of the Citizenship Act, 1955 through the CAA, 2019.

The High Court noted that the definition of "illegal migrant" under Section 2 of the Citizenship Act has been renewed after the new citizenship law was passed. As per the amendment, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan will not be treated as illegal migrants under the Act.

It was alleged the woman obtained the Indian passport through fraudulent documents. The court noted these allegations of fabrication and manipulation of IDs such as Aadhaar and PAN would have to establish by the prosecution in the trial.

The petitioner told the court that in 2003, she came to India to pursue higher education. Later she married an Indian resident and obtained a passport by furnishing valid documents. In 2019, the petitioner and her son were detained by an Immigration Officer at Kolkata airport, but were released later.

After this incident, the Regional Passport Office issued a notice for the revocation of her passport, and then local police arrested her, following a complaint lodged by the Assistant Passport Officer in Bengaluru, and then remanded in judicial custody.

The FIR registered against her cited Sections 465, 471, 468 of the Indian Penal Code; Sections 5, 12 and 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 and Section 3(1)(c) of the Citizenship Act, 1955. The lower court denied her bail, and then the woman moved the High Court.

The woman in defence pointed out the police had failed to produce the chargesheet in the matter within time and she was entitled to bail given that she has been in judicial custody since November 7, 2019.

The High Court observed that government's counsel did not deny the petitioner could avail the benefit of the amended Section 2 of Citizenship Act, 1955.

The High Court directed the woman to furnish a bond of Rs 2,00,000.

The court also imposed a few conditions: She shall not tamper with evidence; she shall cooperate in the investigation and shall appear before the Investigating Officer when called; She shall not leave the jurisdiction of the trial court concerned without prior permission; and she shall mark her attendance on the 1st and 15th of every calendar month between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. for a period of two months.

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Flavian, Mangaluru/Kuwait

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    Shankar

    Thumbs up !

    DisAgree Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangaluru/Kuwait

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    In that case, why not Muslims too can have their rights under CAA ?

    DisAgree [19] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shankar, Mangaluru

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    We are just being careful. We do not have anything against Muslims from Pakistan. We awarded Padma to Adnana Sami and also citizenship.

    Even if Tasleema Nasrin requests, she will get Indian citizenship.
    But we can not extend the same privilege to all Pakistani Muslims. There are chances that terrorists, spies or conspirators getting into India and seeking citizenship and carry out their work freely here.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [30] Reply Report Abuse

  • Prakash, Mangalore

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    Logically CAA looks justified and necessary !!
    But leaving out poor and helpless Muslims and putting them in detention camps should never happen.

    Its inhuman even for animals !!
    based on NRC let the government document them with bio metrics and check criminal backgrounds and give them temporary documents. may be after five more years based on their temporary documents and criminal records government can grant them permanent nationality.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • francis, Mangalore

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    Nobody will be put in detention centre now.

    There is no provision for it in the CAA.

    refer to the act.
    Its available on the net.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [9] Report Abuse

  • sandesh, Mangalore

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    About NRC- lets discuss about it when it comes.

    Talking too much about something that has not come is only creating confusion.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [10] Report Abuse

  • francis, Mangalore

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    Not under CAA.
    They can apply through normal route.

    why?
    because it was promised in 1947 itself- by Gandhi and many others.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • John Tauro, M'lore

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    The CAA was necessitated due to religious persecution in three neighbouring countries and hence is exclusively for the relief of persecuted minorities only. People of all religions of other countries including Muslims of Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh can obtain citizenship under CA of 1955, in which they have will have to complete a total of 11 years stay in India. The advantage is they are free to travel out of India any number of times and come back during the 11 year period. Whereas those (persecuted minorities) seeking citizenship under CAA have to complete 5 years of continuous stay in the country. These are not free to travel out of India without completing 5 years stay inside the country.

    DisAgree [1] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • We, India

    Sat, Feb 01 2020

    Citizenship through CAA is given based on religions and not based on persecution. Read the bill and don't spread rumors. These illegal immigrants will be given citizenship easily even if they are not persecuted. But the real Indians have to go through lot of hardship to gain back their citizenship. Only 52% Indians were literate in 1991. How many Indians will have older documents without any spelling mistake? Remember, Aadhaar PAN Passport voter ID card etc are not valid documents for NRC (Watch Amit Shah's interview with Navika).

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Gurudath, M'lore/Mumbai

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    Non Muslims should not be forced into Bangladesh, Pakistan or Afghanistan where they face danger. CAA makes this process legal and easy.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • sunitha, udupi

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    she came for higher education and did not leave, not because of persecution in Bangladesh

    DisAgree [4] Agree [19] Reply Report Abuse

  • Valerian D'souza, Udupi / Mumbai

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    We can not assume.
    As for educational purpose only one could come to India from Bangladesh that time, she may have come legally. But may have not gone back for the conditions best known to her.
    As per clarification, one can not prove persecution, therefore no proof is required!

    DisAgree [3] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • francis, Mangalore

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    Have you asked- why doesnt she want to go back there?
    If she claims its because of the religious persecution, then she will be covered under CAA.

    DisAgree Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • John Tauro, M'lore

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    Even otherwise she was eligible for citizenship on grounds of her marriage to an India and having completed 11 years of stay as stipulated in CA of 1955. Now since she has committed an offence of obtaining passport through fraudulent means, she cannot go unpunished.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • moshu, mangaluru

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    Modi and Shah on the radar of International Court of Justice.

    DisAgree [27] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • Chris, Tel Aviv

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    Glad Modi govt allowed all minorities from Islamic nations to seek refuge in India . Long live Modi , long live Amit Shah .Those nations will rot just like the rest in Middle East .

    DisAgree [13] Agree [44] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    We don't want illegal people in India ...

    DisAgree [28] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • francis, Mangalore

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    To determine that, we need to have NRC.

    Citizen registry is the only way to check who is illegal and who is not.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sanjay, Hebri

    Wed, Jan 29 2020

    Good. She came here due to percussion from Islamists in Bangla, which was once India before partition, she became Bangladeshi due to the demand of Jinnah for a islamic country.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [46] Reply Report Abuse

  • moshu, mangaluru

    Wed, Jan 29 2020

    CAA, NRC ek bahana hai lekin asal me desh ko jalana hai.

    DisAgree [35] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • francis, Mangalore

    Thu, Jan 30 2020

    You can spread fake news all you want.
    It wont make any difference.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Bengaluru: Citing CAA, high court grants bail to 'illegal' Bangladeshi Christian woman



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.