Babri mosque demolition accused to appear in court on June 4


Lucknow, May 29 (IANS): The special CBI court, conducting the Babri mosque demolition trial, will record statements of the accused under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) on June 4.

The court will record the statements of as many as 32 accused, including the then Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Kalyan Singh, former Deputy Prime Minister L. K. Advani, BJP leaders M. M. Joshi, Uma Bharati, Vinay Katiyar, Sadhvi Ritambhara, Sakshi Maharaj, Ram Vilas Vedanti and Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh.

As presence of the accused Advani, Joshi and Uma Bharati are already exempted till further directions, other accused moved their exemption plea on Thursday citing lockdown difficulties.

A court official said that if the lockdown is extended, the accused could be asked to appear before the court through video conferencing.

The hearing will enable the accused to explain their innocence and further explain the incriminating circumstances that existed in the evidence led by the prosecuting agency CBI against them.

Earlier, special judge S. K. Yadav had recorded in his order that the CBI concluded its prosecution evidence and no further prosecution evidence remained to be led.

The prosecution evidence was, in fact, completed on March 6, 2020, itself and the court had asked some of the accused, including Champat Rai, Lallu Singh and Prakash Sharma, to appear before it on March 24 for recording of statement under Section 313 CrPC, but due to the lockdown and closure of the court, the proceedings could not be held.

Meanwhile, when the court resumed on May 18, the defence counsel moved an application to summon three prosecution witnesses in order to cross examine them. The court allowed the application and completed proceedings on Wednesday.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • kamath, Mani

    Fri, May 29 2020

    Bus karo Yaar drama... 🎭

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • prem, moodbidri

    Fri, May 29 2020

    May be to grant Clean Chit !

    DisAgree [1] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mohammed, India

    Fri, May 29 2020

    The vedict will be, these accused tried to stop kar sevaks from demolishing the babri masjid but couldn’t handle them.. hence all accused is acquitted... mark my words, take screenshot of my message.. this is 100% going to happen..

    DisAgree [3] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • moshu, mangaluru

    Fri, May 29 2020

    Demolition of Babri masjid was an attack on constitution, perpetrators must be punished but this piece focuses on delays in the legal system, looking at both, the scope of the problem, and its implication on the criminal justice system..

    DisAgree [3] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • GURKA, MANGALURU

    Fri, May 29 2020

    We need the HOSPITALS for the treatment of HUMAN BEINGS !!! Not that STATUES, MOSQUES, CHURCHES, COW SHEDS etc etc ... If the human live then we think about other things in life !! Common people ( they called them as immigrants or labours in their own country where respective states fail to secure the employment for each and everyone and forced to wonder in other states or MIDDLE EAST like slaves - who made them ???)

    DisAgree [1] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rathan, Mangalore

    Fri, May 29 2020

    Gurka
    Japan developed within 30 years of end of 2nd WW Germany developed within 25 years of WW2 why India could not develop even after 30 years of one party rule In centre after Independence? Think over it
    Because of khangress India could not develop as all r busy in looting and all States which had khangress rule in first 30 years like UP, Bihar, MP could not provide jobs for them and they migrated to other States

    DisAgree [5] Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Babri mosque demolition accused to appear in court on June 4



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.