Philippine journalist sued again for cyber-defamation


Manila, Jun 19 (IANS): Philippine journalist Maria Ressa has a second cyber-defamation lawsuit pending, filed by businessman Wilfredo Keng on February 13 because of a tweet published a year earlier by the director of Rappler, the outlet reported on Friday.

Ressa was already convicted of cyber-defamation Monday following a lawsuit also filed by Keng in 2017 due to an article published by Rappler in May 2012, in which the businessman was linked to drug trafficking and human trafficking allegations based on an intelligence report, reports Efe news.

For that demand, Ressa and the journalist Reynaldo Santos, author of the article, can face between six months and six years in prison, although the sentence is not yet final.

In this new complaint, Keng sues the journalist for a tweet from February 19, 2019, which showed screenshots of an article now removed on the website of the Philstar newspaper, which related the businessman to the murder of former Manila councilor Chika Go.

The Philstar removed the article the next day from its website after Keng's lawyers threatened to take legal action.

The management of the medium indicated that they wanted to be "prudent" since "the scope and limits of the Cybercrime Prevention Law of 2012 -which served as the basis to condemn Ressa- have not yet been explored", Rappler reported Friday.

According to Keng's eleven-page complaint, in publishing that article, Ressa "spread malicious allegations" against him "with his 350,000 followers and anyone with internet access",

Keng's alleged links to drugs and human trafficking cited by Rappler and Philstar's articles were based on a confidential intelligence report, obtained by veteran investigative journalist Aries Rufo, who died in 2015 and who contributed to the Santos story.

The cyber-defamation conviction of Ressa and Santos last Monday has been widely questioned by legal experts in the Philippines, as the crime of defamation prescribes after one year and Keng's lawsuit came 5 years after the publication of the report.

However, the Justice Department admitted the lawsuit based on a recent Cybercrime law and established that cybercrime prescribes at age 12.

Another irregularity is that the law was approved in October 2012, five months after the publication of the report, so it was applied retroactively.

The prosecution relied on the fact that a typographical error was corrected in 2014, to allege the "republication" of it and avoid the pitfall of retroactivity.

Ressa has seven other pending criminal cases related to tax evasion and the Philippine media property law, causes that she attributes to "political persecution" by Rappler's critical journalism with the Rodrigo Duterte government, who has not hidden her animosity toward the outlet.

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Harley, Philippines

    Mon, Jun 22 2020

    It's so stressful reading people's comments on defending press freedom, where in fact Ressa's libel case was filed against her for writing false information and fake news. Be more open-minded people! 🙄

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Elizabeth santiago, Dinalupihan bataan

    Sun, Jun 21 2020

    Journalists must verify everything they report. People base their perceptions and opinions on subjects according to what the news offer. If reporters and broadcasters couldn't do such a thing, then maybe their field of choice is not really for them. Just being honest. 🤷‍♂

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Herky Ngaspi, Baguio City

    Sun, Jun 21 2020

    Although it is the responsibility of the journalists to seek and report the truth, we cannot always say that the news being delivered to us are 100% objective. If we really look into writing and reporting, it is possible to inject a byline’s opinion to a news report without the audiences’ knowledge

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rogelio, baguio

    Sun, Jun 21 2020

    She deserves it. You do not go around spreading fake news about innocent people and expect to be free all your life. If we Filipinos really want justice, then we shouldn’t be selective.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jeffrey Singson, tacloban city

    Sun, Jun 21 2020

    Journalists are expected to be accurate and fair with their work. They should be upholding and practicing their Code of Ethics. I’ve been reading articles on Ressa’s case and I believe Keng has all the rights to sue her. If only she did her job right, then the “jail time” shouldn’t have taken place – considering that Rappler was given some time to take down articles of wrong accusations against Keng, the “the real victim” on what had happened.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rauol Lough, Philippines

    Sun, Jun 21 2020

    What Ressa did was a personal attack against an innocent businessman. Not only did she write about Keng's "connection" with CJ Corona, her Rappler also disseminated news dati saying Keng's businesses are drug-related. Kung ako nasa position nung Keng, I will also file a libel case against Ressa and Rappler especially when I'm sure that there is no truth behind what they want the public to believe in.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • jerome alparo, bacolod city

    Sun, Jun 21 2020

    It really saddens me that there are people who actually think that this is a matter of press freedom oppression. If the media is being suppressed then why are they so free to release and publish the article with wrong info?
    May this be a lesson to the media people out there. People like us look up to you, so please help us find out or figure out the right and accurate news

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Philippine journalist sued again for cyber-defamation



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.