Arnab Vs Maha Assembly, CJI cites his father was also served a notice from Assembly


New Delhi, Oct 12 (IANS): During the hearing of Arnab Goswami's plea on Monday, challenging the breach of privilege notice by Maharashtra Assembly, Chief Justice S.A. Bobde said his father, along with Nani Palkhiwala, had been served with a similar notice.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appeared before the top court and informed the bench that he is representing the Centre.

Last month, the apex court had issued notice on a plea of Goswami challenging the September 16 show cause sent to him by the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly for his criticism of alleged government inaction in the death of Bollywood actor Sushant Singh Rajput case.

The Chief Justice said but the Centre is not a party in the matter. Senior advocate Harish Salve, representing Goswami, said we have served the Union of India.

The Chief Justice asked, whether the privileges committee taken note of this show cause notice? Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing the Maharashtra government, submitted the complaint has to be made to the Speaker, then it was served upon the privileges committee.

The Chief Justice said in the House, when one member alleges a statement against another, then the Speaker of the House takes note of it and then forwards it to the Privilege Committee. "My father, Arvind Bobde and the late Mr Nani Palkhivala were served such a notice by the Maharashtra Assembly", said the Chief Justice, who headed the bench also comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian.

Salve submitted, "I hope they do not take a confrontational position." The bench replied to Salve, "You have come here due to anxiety, but we have to adhere to the law in this case."

The bench noted that it needs to see whether the show cause notice was served to Goswami after the Privileges Committee perused the same. After a brief hearing in the matter, the bench adjourned the case for two weeks to allow Goswami to serve the Assembly with a copy of his affidavit.

Earlier, the top court had sought reply from the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly in the plea filed by Goswami. The top court had said it understands the gravity of the matter. "But this is only a show cause notice and there is no privilege motion", said the bench.

Salve had submitted "I am on jurisdiction. Assembly's jurisdiction cannot extend beyond the House."

Chief Justice had said the privilege motion is usually dealt by a committee of privileges and there needs to be a charge by the committee.

 

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Sachidanand Shetty, Mundkur/Dubai

    Tue, Oct 13 2020

    Look at the apathy of Maharashtra State Assembly.... they don't bother anything but not Goswami
    They do not have any other issue to concentrate??? Why you want to go behind Press..... As you know all most all Channels either Pro and Anti to any ruling or opposition Party in India. I never seen nor heard any Channel, Media, News paper is unbiased to any Political Party
    Now the situation in India is.... when it appears in any Channel or Media or News Paper.... don't take it serious.... Because it's all for their TRP only

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Arnab Vs Maha Assembly, CJI cites his father was also served a notice from Assembly



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.