Validity of Places of Worship Act 1991: SC seeks Centre's reply


New Delhi, Mar 12 (IANS): The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Centre on a PIL challenging the validity of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 which barred litigation on any place of worship for change of its character as existed in 1947.

The matter assumes significance in the backdrop of demands to resume litigation on the Kashi-Mathura temples, related to Lord Shiva and Lord Krishna respectively, in Uttar Pradesh.

The Act did not include the Ayodhya Ram Janmabhoomi case which was decided by the top court in 2019.

A bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde sought reply from the Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice, and Ministry of Culture.

The top court issued a notice on the plea filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay.

"Centre by making impugned provisions in 1991 has created arbitrary, irrational retrospective cut-off date, declaring that character of place of worship and pilgrimage as it existed on 15.8.1947 shall continue and barred the remedy by way of suit with respect to such matter in any court," said the plea.

The plea argued that this is a serious jolt on the rights of Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs to worship and profess their religion and restore their religious places even through the court.

The plea contended that it was necessary to state that members of other faith have occupied those places taking advantage of the pitiable condition of Hindus during Mughal and British Rule.

"The sovereign can remedy wrong committed by invaders and the sovereignty lies in people who have given themselves a Constitution, which has distributed the functions in three organs -- Legislature, Executive and Judiciary -- and same has to be exercised by every branch within the parameters," added the plea.

The plea also urged the top court to direct and declare that Section 2 of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, as "void and unconstitutional" for being violative of Articles 14,15,21,25,26,29 of the Constitution, in so far as it seeks to validate 'places of worship', "illegally built by barbaric invaders".

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Dr Mohan Prabhu, LL.D, QC, Mangalore/Kankanady, Ottawa/Canada

    Fri, Mar 12 2021

    If Parliament can repeal British era laws as it has done since 15.8.1947, it can repeal this law as well, as it tramples people's right to seek judicial remedy. Let the court decide whether the continuation of status quo of the religious places is or is not valid. As Jossey says, God dwells in our hearts; he also dwells in temples, churches and gurdwars where humans have created a special dwelling place, as well as in nature.

    DisAgree [6] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • mahesh, mangalore

    Fri, Mar 12 2021

    its time to repeal the act.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Fri, Mar 12 2021

    God dwells in our Hearts ...

    DisAgree [1] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Validity of Places of Worship Act 1991: SC seeks Centre's reply



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.