Protest is not terror activity, HC grants bail to 3 in Delhi riots


New Delhi, Jun 15 (IANS): The Delhi High Court on Tuesday granted bail to Natasha Narwal, Devangana Kalita and Asif Iqbal Tanha, in a Delhi Riots case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.

A bench comprising of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Anup J. Bhambhani held that prima facie, no offence under sections 15, 17 or 18 of the UAPA is made out on the basis of the material on record in the present case against the three.

Granting bail to Narwal, the court said: "We can discern no specific or particularised allegation, much less any material to bear out the allegation, that the appellant incited violence, what to talk of committing a terrorist act or a conspiracy or act preparatory to the commission of a terrorist act as understood in the UAPA."

The court noted that it is constrained to express, that it seems, that in its anxiety to suppress dissent, in the mind of the state, the line between the constitutionally guaranteed right to protest and terrorist activity seems to be getting somewhat blurred. "If this mindset gains traction, it would be a sad day for democracy", said the court.

While granting bail to Tanha, the court said: "Foisting extremely grave and serious penal provisions engrafted in sections 15, 17 and 18 of the UAPA frivolously upon people, would undermine the intent and purpose of the Parliament in enacting a law that is meant to address threats to the very existence of our Nation. The wanton use of serious penal provisions would only trivialise them."

The court said bail to three was subject to the personal bond of Rs 50,000 and two local sureties. And the conditions also include the three surrendering their passports and not indulging in activities, which could hamper the case.

Tanha is a student pursuing graduation at Jamia Millia Islamia. He was arrested in the Delhi riots case under UAPA in May 2020 and has been in continuous custody since then. Narwal and Kalita are PhD scholars at Jawaharlal Nehru University, who are associated with the Pinjra Tod Collective. They have been in custody since May 2020.

The case pertains to the Delhi police investigation into the "larger conspiracy", which led to the riots in February 2020. According to police, the three accused along with other accused persons conspired to cause disruption, which could lead to disturbance in law and order at an unprecedented scale.

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • ayes p, kudla/ksa

    Tue, Jun 15 2021

    Yes ofcourse

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mohammed, India

    Tue, Jun 15 2021

    To say these words court took 1 year.. very good

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • anthony, mangalore

    Tue, Jun 15 2021

    Hope the High Courts and the Supreme Court will examine on fast track basis all the UAPA cases as well as over 7000 citizens charges with Sedition and grant relief to all of them and set aside these laws for reframing them in Parliment and with final approval and scrutiny by the Supreme Court or else Govts will misuse these laws to harass, intimidate and silence freedom of Speech.

    DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Nallasopara

    Tue, Jun 15 2021

    Slap on the face for Bhakts ...

    DisAgree Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mohammed, Mangalore

    Tue, Jun 15 2021

    To tell you the truth Mr.Arvind Kejirwal is from BJP plan B team who is working behind the scene for Amit shah

    DisAgree [2] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Protest is not terror activity, HC grants bail to 3 in Delhi riots



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.