How Right is Right to Education?

October 21, 2012

It is at times well said that our education system changes with the elections in India. Every political party has in mind its own manifesto. But the recent amendment of Article 45 of our constitution is a revolutionary step irrespective of the political party. But not all are happy. Dont we remember how KUSUMA called for a bundh of several schools for the government’s lack of clarity.

The Right to food, Right to Information, and Right to education are considered to be fundamental and crucial rights for social well-being and transparent governance. The promise of guaranteed employment (i.e. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act-MNREGA) and Right to Information Act (RTI) 2005 have already come into force earlier. Now the RTE Act 2009 has also come into force from 1st April 2010. There is commotion everywhere about its implementation and its effects. Don’t you too doubt about it?

It must be recalled that after India’s independence, when the founding fathers first recognized education under the Directive Principle of State Policy (DPSP) as “The state shall endeavour  to provide within a period of ten years from the commencement of this constitution for free and compulsory education for all children until they complete the age of fourteen years” (Article 45), was the only article in the constitution to have a concrete time frame of ten years. Yet, evidence shows neither the stipulated time was respected nor the issue given due importance for a long span of time .

Over the years government sponsored education has failed to promote literacy and draw fruit from the above article. Kendriya Vidyalayas, Sainik Schools, Railway school, Navodaya Vidyalayas have been trade marks steps. Yet there was a great need to multiply its effect.

 

What does RTE say?

RTE says that 25% reservation for Economically Weaker Section (EWS) in all government and unaided private schools is a must except for unaided minority schools and boarding schools.

In simple words, RTE says, all aided schools must provide 25 % quota to disadvantaged sections living around the specified school radius. This implies that every school must respect the right to education and promote equality and social concern in their institution.

It took 60 years to remove the segregation in the field of education. Some of the reasons for the failure of the system are non-transparency in the use of funds, improper system and wrong implementation, privatization, poor functioning and planning by governments, etc.

According to a few educationists, there are various political, economical, infrastructural and social implications of this RTE Act:

  • Students of disadvantaged groups may become less meritorious, unable to match other students.
  • Adjustment with elite students in school and class environment will be difficult.
  • There will be unlawful intervention by the government in the functioning aspect.
  • Less educated parents may lack in giving educational support to the child at home.
  • Possible harm to the disadvantaged child in school.
  • For me personally, the above points don’t seem well justified. It is true that something new takes time to be accepted.
  • It also shatters the perspective of elite schools who never thought above educating poor children. Therefore creativity and adaptability is the need of the hour.

The poor are yet to breach the ivory tower of quality education. Every child has a legal right to schooling, but a child’s birth determines what kind of school he/she can enter. All these years poor parents had no option but to send their children to government schools. Now it has become a privilege and right to send them to private and good schools.

RTE could create spaces for the first time in history of structured inequality, where children of the rich and the poor would study, work, play, eat and grow together. Merit must not be the drive of education, but empowerment of all, especially the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS). The Adjustment will happen slowly once we realize and accept that we have a responsibility to mould citizens (ALL CITIZENS), including the poor ones for future.

If education inspires to learn what he/she likes or wants and not forcing someone, the true meaning of education is realised. Education must ultimately help one to experiment and think creatively.


Salient Features of RTE:

Fulfills the Constitutional obligation.
Education is made available at the neighbourhood.
Emphasis on equality.
Clear definition of fees- uniform, midday meals, text books etc.
Compulsion on state and not on parents.
Clear time frame.
Composition of SMCs (School Management Committees).
 

Government schools?

25 % quota to disadvantaged sections under RTE in private schools may mean neglect and closure of government schools. According to District Information System for Education (DISE) data for 2011-12, total no. of govt schools (LPS and HPS) in Bangalore North is 511 in and Bangalore South 891. Class 1 enrollment in these two divisions stands at 9,728 and 16,707, respectively as on September 2011. In contrast, the number of unaided private LPS and HPS in Bangalore North is 937 and 1,377 in Bangalore South. Class 1 enrollment stands at 43,045 and 65,774 respectively.

So if RTE is observed strictly in all unaided schools, those currently going to government schools, may be absorbed by un-aided schools over the next few years.

According to a research conducted by Oxford University, parents in A.P are opting for private schools due to growing dissatisfaction with government. Parents wish their children study in English-medium schools.

Prof Martin Woodhead also said that schooling in India is ‘market-driven.’ There is a need to reform government schools to deliver quality education at least for the sake of those poor who will still continue to send only their boys to school in spite of RTE. Government schools will still be a boon to girl child education.


Hands-on COMPASSION?

Making education a fundamental right is surely a step in the right direction to address the issues of elementary education in India. Since it is legislation we can question and improve the education system.

If we dream of a humane India we need to build and foster democratic classrooms. Teachers recruited must dare to learn things beyond the syllabus and make learning enjoyable. Sr. Cyril, an Irish nun, who for nearly two decades has catered to street girls and orphans in Kolkata’s Loretto Sealdah School, Kolkata says, “My children look poised, confident and hopeful. It is fashionable to teach ‘hands-on computer,’ ‘hands-on problem solving,’ then why not hands-on compassion?”

Most educationists have never realized that the families of poor students who attend school still remain poor in spite of their going to school This is due to the lack of proper teaching facilities in government schools which stick to minimum education. RTE hereby has made the primary responsibility of every educational institution very clear. Let compassion be our guide.

Nevertheless the proper implementation, monitoring and evaluation of improving quality of public schools, enhanced public-private participation, enhancement of access and adequate quality of education to all children and thereby achieving the goal of Universal Elementary Education (UEE) have to go a long way. It is a mechanism to curb social exclusion. Thereby every institution will realize their social responsibility and have a share in nation building process.

 

Lancy Fernandes - Archives:  

 

 

By Lancy Fernandes
To submit your article / poem / short story to Daijiworld, please email it to news@daijiworld.com mentioning 'Article/poem submission for daijiworld' in the subject line. Please note the following:

  • The article / poem / short story should be original and previously unpublished in other websites except in the personal blog of the author. We will cross-check the originality of the article, and if found to be copied from another source in whole or in parts without appropriate acknowledgment, the submission will be rejected.
  • The author of the poem / article / short story should include a brief self-introduction limited to 500 characters and his/her recent picture (optional). Pictures relevant to the article may also be sent (optional), provided they are not bound by copyright. Travelogues should be sent along with relevant pictures not sourced from the Internet. Travelogues without relevant pictures will be rejected.
  • In case of a short story / article, the write-up should be at least one-and-a-half pages in word document in Times New Roman font 12 (or, about 700-800 words). Contributors are requested to keep their write-ups limited to a maximum of four pages. Longer write-ups may be sent in parts to publish in installments. Each installment should be sent within a week of the previous installment. A single poem sent for publication should be at least 3/4th of a page in length. Multiple short poems may be submitted for single publication.
  • All submissions should be in Microsoft Word format or text file. Pictures should not be larger than 1000 pixels in width, and of good resolution. Pictures should be attached separately in the mail and may be numbered if the author wants them to be placed in order.
  • Submission of the article / poem / short story does not automatically entail that it would be published. Daijiworld editors will examine each submission and decide on its acceptance/rejection purely based on merit.
  • Daijiworld reserves the right to edit the submission if necessary for grammar and spelling, without compromising on the author's tone and message.
  • Daijiworld reserves the right to reject submissions without prior notice. Mails/calls on the status of the submission will not be entertained. Contributors are requested to be patient.
  • The article / poem / short story should not be targeted directly or indirectly at any individual/group/community. Daijiworld will not assume responsibility for factual errors in the submission.
  • Once accepted, the article / poem / short story will be published as and when we have space. Publication may take up to four weeks from the date of submission of the write-up, depending on the number of submissions we receive. No author will be published twice in succession or twice within a fortnight.
  • Time-bound articles (example, on Mother's Day) should be sent at least a week in advance. Please specify the occasion as well as the date on which you would like it published while sending the write-up.

Comment on this article

  • Fr. Melwin Pinto s.j., Mangalore, Rome.

    Sun, Oct 21 2012

    Well said Lancy, I appreciate your views. But let me draw your attention to two points.
    first: This RTE was discussed superficially as a bill and all stake holders were not consulted sufficiently. The private schools, while they have to have 'hands-on compassion' as you put it, have not been taken into confidence at any stage. It is nice on paper but hard to implement.
    second: Just as right to education, right to food, health, decent housing are also rights and the Govt has an obligation to provide the same. Will it bring acts where private hospitals will treat 25% poor people free?, restaurants will feed 25% poor people free, housing complexes will provide 25% of the houses for the economically backward? Why only the education Sector? In other words, is the Govt accepting its failure to provide good education? Let us first of all know that the Govt has grossly failed in their responsibility and is finding an easy solution...

  • Roshan Braganza, Udyavar / Mumbai

    Sun, Oct 21 2012

    The schools also must accept married girls. There were couples of example , where they denied permission. Child brides also have the right to education.


Leave a Comment

Title: How Right is Right to Education?



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.