The Worst Economic Disaster - Great Depression of 1929

October 21, 2008

The world is in the grip of economic meltdown. This is manifested by the nose-diving of stock markets beginning with the United States and followed by the European and Asian countries. In the US alone within the span of seven days shareholders lost nearly two and a half trillion dollars of wealth. The bankruptcy of the financial giants such as the Lehman Brothers has pressed the panic button that has sent the governments, investors, industrialists, businessmen and even the consumers into a phase of anxiety, uncertainty and fear.

The massive bail-out plan for the financial institutions to the tune of 700 billion dollars by the US administration has not restored confidence in the stock markets. The world seems to be on the threshold of an economic recession that may take disastrous form affecting the lives of billions of people all over the world. As the economy has become global, so the consequences of the recession also affect the entire world.

As the US has been the nerve-centre of the world economy, any adverse development in the US economy is bound to affect the world. This is not a new phenomenon, and the recent melt-down is not the first economic disaster that the US in particular and the world in general have faced. There had been periodic economic corrections in the form of short phased recessions in world economy. However, the US and the world had suffered the worst economic disaster in human history in the form of the Great Depression of 1929.

The Great Depression began in the US in the ominous month of October 1929, to be precise on October 24, known as Black Thursday when stock values dropped rapidly resulting in increasing uncertainty and panic among the stockholders who resorted to distress selling of their stocks on Tuesday, October 29. Thousands of stockholders lost large sums of money. Banks, factories and shops closed leaving millions of Americans jobless and penniless. Many people had to depend on the government charity to provide them with food. The Great Depression of 1929 affected almost every nation of the world.

The decade of 1920s was a period of prosperity in the US. Following the end of the First World War in 1918, the Americans who had followed a moderate life style desired to live in comfort and luxury. Hence, there was a huge demand for durable luxury items which were churned out of the factories. Moreover, there was increasing trade between the US and Europe as the war ravaged European countries increasingly depended on American products which gave tremendous boost to the US industries and business.

The new economic boom of the ‘Golden Twenties’ was manifested by the Jazz culture, women smoking, drinking and wearing short skirts and many young people spending their weekends away from their homes. The average American could afford to buy automobiles and household appliances.

As the industry and trade prospered, the stock market registered an upward trend which attracted even average American citizens who went on speculating in the stock market where big money could be made. Banks and other financial institutions were eager to expand their business by providing generous loans to the people not only to buy their houses, cars and household appliances but also to speculate in the stock market.

While industry and business prospered in the US, the farming community fared worst as the prices of the farm products fell about 40 percent and remained low through the 1920s. The farm depression forced a large number of farmers to rent their land or move out. Some of the farmers lost so much money that they could not pay the mortgage on their farm.

Besides the farmers, workers in the coal, railroad and textile industries failed to share the prosperity of the 1920s. While the industry and business gained by 65 percent, the average workers’ wage had increased only by 8 percent. As a result these workers could not buy goods as fast as the industry produced them. Many people had to buy them on credit. Later, workers had to reduce their spending to repay their debts which resulted in the decrease of the amount of money in circulation. This gradually affected the business.

Through the 1920s, the European countries recovered from their wartime economic crisis. With the reconstruction of their industrial infrastructure, the European nations began to increase their manufacturing capacity which resulted in their decreased dependence on the US manufacturers.

From 1925 to 1929 the average price of common stocks in the New York Stock Exchange more than doubled. Rising stock values encouraged many people to speculate. People began to buy more and more stocks, usually by borrowing money from banks and financial institutions in hope of making large profits following future price increases. Meanwhile, with the saturation of the domestic market and the reduction in the volume of trade, the US industry and business gradually began to lose profits.

The above factors led to the bursting of the ‘economic bubble’. As the saying goes, ‘everything that goes up has to come down’, the stock value that had reached the unrealistic height had to come down. However, the slide was not gradual but drastic and quick that took every one in the US by shock. Between October 24 to October 29, the value of the stocks in the New York Stock Exchange dropped so sharply that the American dream ended in nightmare.

The Great Depression that started in October 1929, incidentally during the Republican administration, continued till 1933 until Franklin D Roosevelt of the Democratic  Party became the President of the US. During the intervening period banks and individuals with investments in the stock market lost large sums.

The Great Depression had disastrous consequences on the US economy and society. Nearly 13 million people became unemployed; industrial production fell by nearly 45% between the years 1929 and 1932; construction of homes dropped by 80%; about 9,000 banks failed with nearly 5000 of them going out of business. The bank failures wiped out the savings of millions of people.

The human suffering became a reality for millions of Americans with the continuation of the depression. Many died of disease and malnutrition. Thousands lost their homes because they could not pay the mortgage. A large number of families and young people wandered through the country seeking food, clothing, shelter and jobs.

The Great Depression of 1929 in the US led to a worldwide economic slump in the 1930s that affected almost all the countries. It resulted in a sharp decrease in world trade as each country tried to protect its own industries and products by raising tariffs on imported goods. To meet the disastrous economic consequences of the Great Depression, a number of countries changed their leaders and type of government. In Germany, poor economic conditions led to the rise of Adolph Hitler. Japan invaded China to increase her economic resources. Militarism and aggressive policies of both Germany and Japan eventually led to the Second World War (1939-45).

The twelve years of Republican administration in the US had witnessed both the prosperity and the Great Depression. In the presidential election of 1932, the American people overwhelmingly voted into power Franklin D Roosevelt of the Democratic Party who promised to lead the nation out of economic chaos and misery. Through series of measures such as ‘Relief, Recovery and Reform’, collectively known as the ‘New Deal’, Roosevelt succeeded in putting the US back on its economic feet. Roosevelt’s reassuring phrase to the American people was “You have to fear, fear itself.”

Through the New Deal Programme,  the US administration under the able leadership of Roosevelt, besides providing immediate relief to the affected people, aimed at increasing agricultural and industrial production and reform the Banking system. The grateful nation went on electing Franklin D Roosevelt for four consecutive terms, a record for any US President.

The present economic melt down that began in the US with its ripple effect throughout the world is an echo of the Great Depression of 1929. There are certain parallels between these two phenomena. As in the case of the Great Depression, the present economic crisis in the US has set in motion during the regime of the Republican President, George W Bush. The month of October seems to be ominous in both the cases. Failure of the banking and financial institutions followed by the crash of the stock markets are the common factors that distinguish both the economic disasters. Under these circumstances, it may not be out of place to predict that the American people may elect Barrack Obama of the Democratic Party as the next US President in the November elections.

It is said that ‘History repeats itself’. Further, it can be also said that ‘Those who do not learn from the mistakes of the past are bound to suffer the consequences”.  Let us hope that the world leaders will collectively seek solutions to this economic crisis and spare the world from the economic catastrophe that may lead to mssive unemployment, despair and unforeseen human tragedy.

Dr Eugene D`Souza - Archives:

Know more about Dr Eugene D`Souza :

Dr Eugene D'Souza, Mumbai
To submit your article / poem / short story to Daijiworld, please email it to news@daijiworld.com mentioning 'Article/poem submission for daijiworld' in the subject line. Please note the following:

  • The article / poem / short story should be original and previously unpublished in other websites except in the personal blog of the author. We will cross-check the originality of the article, and if found to be copied from another source in whole or in parts without appropriate acknowledgment, the submission will be rejected.
  • The author of the poem / article / short story should include a brief self-introduction limited to 500 characters and his/her recent picture (optional). Pictures relevant to the article may also be sent (optional), provided they are not bound by copyright. Travelogues should be sent along with relevant pictures not sourced from the Internet. Travelogues without relevant pictures will be rejected.
  • In case of a short story / article, the write-up should be at least one-and-a-half pages in word document in Times New Roman font 12 (or, about 700-800 words). Contributors are requested to keep their write-ups limited to a maximum of four pages. Longer write-ups may be sent in parts to publish in installments. Each installment should be sent within a week of the previous installment. A single poem sent for publication should be at least 3/4th of a page in length. Multiple short poems may be submitted for single publication.
  • All submissions should be in Microsoft Word format or text file. Pictures should not be larger than 1000 pixels in width, and of good resolution. Pictures should be attached separately in the mail and may be numbered if the author wants them to be placed in order.
  • Submission of the article / poem / short story does not automatically entail that it would be published. Daijiworld editors will examine each submission and decide on its acceptance/rejection purely based on merit.
  • Daijiworld reserves the right to edit the submission if necessary for grammar and spelling, without compromising on the author's tone and message.
  • Daijiworld reserves the right to reject submissions without prior notice. Mails/calls on the status of the submission will not be entertained. Contributors are requested to be patient.
  • The article / poem / short story should not be targeted directly or indirectly at any individual/group/community. Daijiworld will not assume responsibility for factual errors in the submission.
  • Once accepted, the article / poem / short story will be published as and when we have space. Publication may take up to four weeks from the date of submission of the write-up, depending on the number of submissions we receive. No author will be published twice in succession or twice within a fortnight.
  • Time-bound articles (example, on Mother's Day) should be sent at least a week in advance. Please specify the occasion as well as the date on which you would like it published while sending the write-up.

Comment on this article

  • Eugene, New Jersey, USA

    Tue, Oct 28 2008

    Dear Dr. D’Souza, Yes it was clear from your article that your focus was the Great Depression and not the current crises. What I found rather strange [Especially as I have read and enjoyed most of your articles published on Daijiworld] was drawing of parallels between the two events based on co-incidence that just happen to be co-incidents and not parallels. It takes a man to admit the same and I want to take my hat off and salute your graciousness.

  • Eugene, New Jersey, USA

    Tue, Oct 28 2008

    Dear Mr. Kumar, In the process of trying to keep my comments to the minimum on Dr. D’Souza’s article I guess I have left a lot to the interpretation of the readers and their imagination. What I have said and would like to reiterate is the logic why lending norms were relaxed. The norms were expressly relaxed because the rate of home ownership was lower among Blacks and Hispanics and the intention was to level the playing field for all. Nowhere have I said that Blacks and Hispanics happen to the majority among defaulters.

    Also I dispute your claim that the majority of defaulters are people who refinanced. The majority were first time home owners who in their eagerness to own property were fooled into signing for mortgages with low introductory rates of interest and when the rates were adjusted on the expiry of the introductory rate these people defaulted as they were unable to come up with the mortgage payment. People who re-financed generally were better off and with more equity in their properties and re-financed mostly to get better interest rates and/or cash out further on their equities. It is interesting that you have offered me a challenge to prove my assertion. I guess what you mean is your presumptuous interpretation.

  • Dr Eugene D'Souza, Mumbai

    Sat, Oct 25 2008

    My sincere thanks to Eugene, New Jersey, USA and Edward, UK for the correct interpretation of the present world financial crisis. Their comments are of great help in understanding the chief reasons for the crisis. The chief focus of my article is the Great Depression of 1929 rather than the present economic melt down. I greatly appreciate all the comments for this article.

  • Girish Kumar, USA

    Sat, Oct 25 2008

    I would like to comment on what Dr. Eugene, the author, has said as well as what Mr. Eugene- New Jersey,USA has stated. Dr. Eugene, First of all, the great depression of the 1930s was not caused by the stock market crash. It's the other way around. It was the depression that led to the stock market crash. The depression did not end in 1933 but lasted the entire decade of the 1930s. The US came out of the depression when it retutrned victorious from World War II. In fact a popular saying during the days following the depression was " the war got us out of the depression".

    Certainly, FDR was a great President, but he was clueless about what to do to confront the depression. He was well known for his fire side chats where he would periodically come on the radio and talk to Americans in a simple and humble manner. He was a master communicator who knew how to make people feel better, not richer. It was by mere coincidence that the US got out of the great Depression. In an effort to help its allies during World War II, the government spend enormous amounts of money on defense and defense related industries.

    This in turn generated jobs and had a ripple effect bringing the nation out of the depression. I am not making this up. You can look at any US history book and verify. Mr. Eugene New Jersey, USA, it is mere speculation that the cause of the current meltdown is a result of poor latinos and blacks not paying their mortgages. In fact, the majority of people who defaulted are the ones who refinanced their mortages and were unable to repay when the adjustable rates increased. Granted, some of these defaulters were black, but to allege that most defaulters were black and that the current meltdown is a result of poor blacks not paying their mortgages is preposterous !!.

    I challenge you to find me a statistic that confirms your assertion. Like it or not, we (immigrants) owe a great debt to blacks and other minority immigrants who preceded us. It was on their backs that the entire infrastructure of America was built.

  • Edward, UK

    Sat, Oct 25 2008

    Dr D'souza sounds too naive to compare 1929 with 2008. They may look similar but the causes are people responsible are very different as Eugene has highlighted here: Eugene, New Jersey, USA Friday, October 24, 2008 While Dr. D'souza's analyses of the Great Depreciation is correct and much has been written about the same, his understanding of the present crises is flawed as his article does not have a grasp the current problem. The current problem is mainly due to the Mortgage crises. The Bush administration has had nothing to do with this.

    The seeds for the same were sowed under the socialist leadership of Jimmy Carter when banks were given directives that they should follow less stringent lending norms to loan applications from minorities especially Black and Hispanic in the name of diversity [a la Janardhan Poojary]. In an appreciating housing market the banks went to the extent of lending up to 105% of the property value [Greed]. When the housing market peaked and started falling and the borrowers started to default the bank did not have collateral to fall back on and took a very heavy beating with liquidating of foreclosures. This then started to cascade and permeate other fields of finance, Insurance etc.

    It is interesting to point out here that not all banks have suffered from the Mortgage crises. Banks that did business in a prudent manner are still thriving and their stocks are still appreciating. Comparing either Senator Obama or Senator McCain to President Franklin D Roosevelt is futile. FDR as President Roosevelt was fondly referred to, had time on his hand. He became the president more than 3 years after the Great Depression. He was a tested leader in so far as he was the Governor of New York State before becoming the president.

    As we know both the Great Depression and the present crises were first felt in New York City. He had a firsthand view of the problem unfolding and had three years to espouse his ‘New Deal’ before becoming the President of the USA. To cut a long story short on a scale of 1 to 100 [with the 100 being what FDR was] Senator McCain [Due to his experience] would score 50 and Senator Obama [whose forte has mainly been elocution with his Gift of the Gab] would score 30.

  • A.D'Cunha Shenoy, Mangaluru

    Fri, Oct 24 2008

    The greatest lesson India has to learn from this financial mess is "dont model India's economy on American model". "False" high standard of living, if I may say. As I see whats happenning in India now from retail, consumer and capital goods is, they are purchased by average Indian on "buy now , pay later" phenomena. This way average Indian owns nothing just like Americans. What we need is reality economics. I call it "sustainomics". While the growth may be slow but it is sustainable.If I can give an example, look at the real estate prices partcularly in Mumbai, Mangalore. Who would pay such premium prices from equity? Yes ,every Tom, Dick and Harry "qualify" for Mortgages. This is the fundamental problem in lending. Sky rocketting prices. Are they worth it? Do these people own their apartments? Or the bank owns them? Here is very common sense model. Earn, Save and spend but spend only from excess savings. This way one does not have to face these crisis situations.

  • Purushottama, Byndoor

    Fri, Oct 24 2008

    Good article. The common factor then and now is " GREED". One should bite as much as he can chew, chew as much as he can swallow and swallow as much as he can digest. The GREED factor made many to make money ( legally or illegally) and to speculate in everything under the sun - be it stocks, shares, metals,oil,commodities, agricultural products etc. etc. The speculative tenedency in the stock market reached its zenith and the bubble has burst.

    The stock indexes came to be the barometers of economic prosperity rather than production and income levels of the citizens. In our own country when the prices of essentials went through the roof the Government did not bother. But when the share index is falling our FM and PM are keen to monitor the situation on a day to day basis! When edible oil crossed Rs.100/- a litre they had no money to effect subsidised imports. Now they are pumping money in the name of liquidity day in and day out. Here the erosion in value of the speculative money invested ( wasted?) by the politicians and business is at stake - not the interest of common man.

    It is good that the share market has collapsed. If speculative tendencies have to stop such things ought to happen so that the Governments will have time to think about other things.In the end it proves the American Model is a failure- may be due to different reasons in 1929 and 2008.

  • Eugene, New Jersey, USA

    Fri, Oct 24 2008

    While Dr. D'souza's analyses of the Great Depreciation is correct and much has been written about the same, his understanding of the present crises is flawed as his article does not have a grasp the current problem. The current problem is mainly due to the Mortgage crises. The Bush administration has had nothing to do with this. The seeds for the same were sowed under the socialist leadership of Jimmy Carter when banks were given directives that they should follow less stringent lending norms to loan applications from minorities especially Black and Hispanic in the name of diversity [a la Janardhan Poojary]. In an appreciating housing market the banks went to the extent of lending up to 105% of the property value [Greed].

    When the housing market peaked and started falling and the borrowers started to default the bank did not have collateral to fall back on and took a very heavy beating with liquidating of foreclosures. This then started to cascade and permeate other fields of finance, Insurance etc. It is interesting to point out here that not all banks have suffered from the Mortgage crises. Banks that did business in a prudent manner are still thriving and their stocks are still appreciating. Comparing either Senator Obama or Senator McCain to President Franklin D Roosevelt is futile. FDR as President Roosevelt was fondly referred to, had time on his hand. He became the president more than 3 years after the Great Depression. He was a tested leader in so far as he was the Governor of New York State before becoming the president.

    As we know both the Great Depression and the present crises were first felt in New York City. He had a firsthand view of the problem unfolding and had three years to espouse his ‘New Deal’ before becoming the President of the USA. To cut a long story short on a scale of 1 to 100 [with the 100 being what FDR was] Senator McCain [Due to his experience] would score 50 and Senator Obama [whose forte has mainly been elocution with his Gift of the Gab] would score 30.

  • Krip Punja, Mangalore/Los Angeles

    Fri, Oct 24 2008

    Yes, indeed, it is a well written article. One thing to recognize is that the Great Depression had its own unique economic factors and the present economic downturn is unique in its own way. The suffering of the people as a consequence is the same, due to resulting unemployment, stock losses and the like. So we tend liken the two, but they are unique. History will remember this downturn differently than than how it will remember the Great Depression.

    The fix for this event will also have to be different, be it Obama or McCain who will do the fixing. There is hope that the downturn will be briefer than the Great Depression, which again, history will judge. Greed is part of man's nature and will always remain until he evolves in his nature.

    Most of our services and products, while it benefits the individual, are produced by the capitalist's quest for profit - so in a way by greed. Until man invents a different motive for providing products and services, we will see and feel the effects of greed on the markets.

  • B R Bhat, Ballambettu / Abu Dhabi

    Fri, Oct 24 2008

    Now people are frightening us with stories of depression. Same people in 1999 frightened us by asking 'are U Y2K OK? and made us crazy with stories of missiles firing on it's own, submarines hitting each other so on.. After that they started the story of boom. they started telling that India will need to produce more than 2,00,000 engrs per year for next five years. Then they told that oil will reach USD200 per barrel, gold will reach AED200 per gram etc... Now the same guys started scaring us that everything will vanish.

    I request people with one thing- if we know how to live within what we earn- nothing to worry. If we want to possess everything by credit- surely the world around us will collapse. thats all. Choice is ours.

  • A.D'Cunha Shenoy, Mangaluru

    Fri, Oct 24 2008

    Mr. Benny. The greatest solution to capitalism is elimination of "GREED". Capitalism breeds Greed. Its the greed that drives people to embrace capitalism. Once, most banks were nationalised but what is happenning now? the central banks are pumping money to keep these non-nationalised banks "afloat". This effectively brings back some kind of socialism. Deficit financing must come to an end. The lesson: if you do not have money, then stop spending. Spend from equity. Some may disagree with me. This is a strong economy unlike the capitalistic liquid economy.

    Borrowing from Paul to pay Peter effectively keeps capitalism going. I wish I can quote a new "ISMs". I think we need a balance of socialism. May be we can call it "Marxism". or Neo-Marxism .Karl Marx will be be at least happy. Taking care of the need and not the greed should be the present day alternative to capitalism.

  • Benny, Kadappa

    Thu, Oct 23 2008

    Mr. A.D. Cunha, Is this the end of pure capitalism you asked. Then what is the alternate or solution. Is there any “Ism” in the world to be applied to introduce a balanced economy other than “capitalism”

  • sarfaraz, MANGLRE/DXB

    Thu, Oct 23 2008

    Very good article , its fact that we have not understood our mistakes.Credit crisis hit us in 1920 and again de same.People have to spend or invest from wat they have in hand or savings rather than taking loans. Nowadays all de world business is thru banks and credits facility.At present everybody facing probs ,complete business is hit here.

  • Maurice Menezes, Moodubelle

    Thu, Oct 23 2008

    I congratulate my esteemed pal Dr Eugene DSouza for this piece of well written article.This article gives insight over the Great Depression in a very lucid style. Moodubelle is indeed proud of him. Warm regds Maurice

  • Ronald Mathias, Mudarangadi/Canada

    Wed, Oct 22 2008

    Interesting to read. Even today in the west particularly in America and Canada people totally live on credit and wants to enjoy the life. Most of the people live on pay to pay cheque, except immigrants to USA and Canada. We Indians, always worry about tommorrow, take care of the family, save enough for our childrens education.

  • A.D'Cunha Shenoy, Mangaluru

    Tue, Oct 21 2008

    Capitalism at its worst. Its all about the juggling of money. Living on credit, hustling the stock and inflating the market econmy, the real economy to look good infact when its bad. The real economics is bound to fail when artificial economies are made. The "living on credit" phenomena is bound to fail unless it has infinite continuity, But it does not. What we see is the manupulation of manupulators and trust me it starts with US playing the big brother to control the worlds money supply and economy. There is no "REAL MONEY" in the US and yes plenty of credit to get the market going. Get to the real economy. Its simple and without manipulation. does equity makes any sense? Is this the end of pure capitalism? Or we are just getting the bad taste of capitalism after the sugary taste, a taste that came with artificial sweeteners when there was no real sugar.

  • Captain Stanley Latif Correa, Urwa Stores/Jeddah,Saudi Arabia

    Tue, Oct 21 2008

    Great Article by Dr. Eugene D' Souza. His article is very informative, accurate & simple. I am sure if public read this wonderful article, they will understand the meaning of worldwide depression, recession & melting down of economics in this month. Hats off Dr.Eugene.

  • Deepak, udupi

    Tue, Oct 21 2008

    Certainly times are depressing. But he the one who sees opportunities succeeds. We should avoid negativity and rumours spreading at this stage. This is the key. Never panic and do not spread the panic.

  • A.S. Mathew, U.S.A.

    Tue, Oct 21 2008

    I do agree with the author that the current meltdown is far beyond a mild recession we used encounter in the U.S. during the cycle of 15 years. Since none of the countries are independent but a part of the world economy, it is affecting every nation, both rich and poor. Since the U.S. is the engine of the world economy with 1/3 leverage in different factors of economic drive, when the U.S. was hit hard, the rest of the world is caught up in this mess. It takes a divine miracle to make a drastic detour, from the route of depression to boom.

    Economists can blame on many factors, and they can predict the time of recovery and doing the best they could, but the disabled ship of world economy is still rocking in a wild sea with a broken anchor.

  • vish, mangalore\usa

    Tue, Oct 21 2008

    It is really good to read the Artical written by Dr Eugene D`Souza. His language is simple, upto point and completely informative. Has our government and people of mangalore regonised this great writter/historian.

  • Montie, DUBAI

    Tue, Oct 21 2008

    By tabulating this article does Dr.Eugene see that we are in the same era of Great Depression. Please speak in todays context.

  • Theo D'Silva, Kadri, Mangalore/ Toronto, Canada

    Tue, Oct 21 2008

    I agree with Dr Eugene in few things but I do contradict in many views which are important for the present day economics. During great depression came the farmers revolution which led to the communism.

    The landlords were willing to throw away the potato peels to pigs rather than people. and there was no wellfare society in Europe as well in America. But now its all different scenario. The clever ones can do all juggling with currency and the world. Rememeber Eugene its all the might and the currency how to play.


Leave a Comment

Title: The Worst Economic Disaster - Great Depression of 1929



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.