New Delhi: Communal Violence Bill will Polarise Society: Sadananda Gowda


Communal Violence Bill will Polarise Society: Sadananda Gowda

Daijiworld Media Network

Bangalore/New Delhi, Sep 10: The Communal Violence Bill has come under fire from various political factions including the BJP, the CPI (M) and the Trinamool Congress. On Saturday September 10, Karnataka chief minister Sadananda Gowda of the BJP, who is in Delhi, too expressed his reservations about the proposed Bill.

Addressing a meeting of the National Integration Council, Gowda said that the Bill was 'clearly biased' and 'one-sided' against the majority community.

He expressed fears that the Bill may 'lead to irreparable polarisation of the society' and pointed out its various faults.

"It appears that the offences committed by the members of the majority community against members of the minority community are punishable whereas identical offences committed by the minority groups against the majority are treated much more lightly," Gowda said.

The Bill presumes that no member of the majority community can be a victim and that minority groups are always the victims, he added.

"Such presumptions are highly erroneous and if institutionalised in the form of a law could lead to irreparable polarisation of the society. The proposed bill could in fact do more harm to communal harmony than serve as a deterrent to communal violence," he said.

Gowda said the proposed bill also went against the country's federal structure.

"In fact the very idea of having a central legislation to tackle a state subject itself goes against the very spirit of our constitution," he said.

"A central legislation would not only infringe on the powers of the state governments but also could lead to being politically misused by the central government," Gowda said.

He said many of the provisions of the proposed bill were also not practical and suggested "serious consultations with the state governments as well as the public at large" to overcome the "deficiencies".

 

 

Provisions of the NAC Drafted Communal Violence Bill

New Delhi, Sep 10 (IANS): The proposed communal violence bill, which was discussed at the National Integration Council (NIC) meeting Saturday, intends to prevent and control targeted violence against the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes and religious and linguistic minorities.

According to the draft bill prepared by the National Advisory Council (NAC), the legislation is intended to enhance state accountability and correct discriminatory exercise of state powers in the context of identity-based violence.

The explanatory note on Prevention of Communal and Targeted violence (Access to Justice and Reparations) Bill, 2011, prepared by NAC, lists its key provisions:

Dereliction of duty by public servants: The bill recognizes offences of both omission and commission. Public servants who act or omit to exercise authority vested in them under law and fail to protect or prevent offences or act with malafide and prejudice shall be guilty of dereliction of duty with penal consequences.

Defining communal and targeted violence: The provisions of this Bill will apply only when it is first established that the offence was 'targeted' in nature. Offences under the Indian Penal Code shall be considered offences under this bill when they meet the definition of 'targeted'.

Breach of command responsibility: The bill seeks to ensure that the power of holding command over the actions of others is indeed upheld as a sacred duty, and that there is culpability for those who are 'effectively in-charge'. The chain of command responsibility may extend to any level where effective decisions to act or not act are taken.

Sanction for prosecution of public servants: The bill proposes that if there is no response to a request for sanction for prosecution within 30 days from the date of the application to the concerned government, sanction to prosecute will be deemed granted. In relation to certain offences under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, when committed by a public servant, the requirement of obtaining sanction is being dispensed with.

Monitoring and accountability: Monitoring and grievance redressal shall be the responsibility of the National Authority for Communal Harmony, Justice and Reparation (NACHJR) and corresponding State Authorities for Communal Harmony, Justice and Reparations (SACHJR).

The monitoring mechanism of national and state authorities will also provide the 'paper trail' to ensure robust accountability of public officials in a court of law.

Composition of the NACHJR: The bill proposes that NACHJR will have seven members of which four must belong either to a linguistic minority or religious minority in any state or to the SCs or STs. No more than two members of the NACHJR may be retired public servants.

Offences of communal and targeted violence: The Indian Penal Code (IPC) contains most offences committed during episodes of communal and targeted violence. These have been appended in a schedule to the bill and shall be considered offences when they meet the threshold of being 'knowingly directed against any person by virtue of membership of a group'.

The brutal forms of sexual assault (beyond the limited IPC definition of rape) and torture have been included in the bill. Additionally, it defines hate propaganda.

Victims' Rights: This bill seeks to strengthen the rights of the victim in the criminal justice system, through certain provisions in their struggle for justice.

Relief and Reparation including compensation: All affected persons, whether or not they belong to non-dominant groups in a state have been given justiciable rights to immediate relief, and comprehensive reparations, including compensation if they suffer any harm as a result of any offence of communal and targeted violence recorded under this Bill.

No compensation for death shall be less than Rs.15 lakh. No compensation for rape shall be less than Rs.5 lakh.

The federal principle: Advisories and recommendations of NAJCHR are not binding on state governments. All powers and duties of investigation, prosecution, and trial remain with the state governments.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Prakash , mangalore

    Mon, Sep 12 2011

    Only the people who are involved in creating problems between the communities should worry on argue about this bill,If live your normal life withour bothering anyone,there is no need of worry,Our CM looks like worried about his chair,thats why he is giving this statement.he knows because of Hindu community he is on position,but thats not true..people are well educated and they know who is the right and wrong person to run the state government.There is no any meaning in CM's statement,its all ZERO.This bill is for all the communities though its majority or minority.All are treated equally.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Harold D'cunha, Mangalore, India

    Mon, Sep 12 2011

    Communal Violence Bill will Polarise Society or communalism is polarising the society.

    This communal violence bill will definitely affect those who indulge in communalism and communalism related violence, hatred. If one is honest, this type of bill will not affect them. Those who have hidden agenda of communalism will definitely oppose this bill as it will expose their true colour. There is no word called majority or minority in the Bill. This phobia is created by BJP as it is their culutre to oppose any bill presented in the parliament by the present govt.

    CPI, CPM has already supported this Bill.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Cyril, Mangalore

    Sun, Sep 11 2011

    Mr. Gowda is misleading the people. He is acting like a rubber stamp listening to the communal interested people who dictate him and he has to listen to them, if he wants to be chief minister.
    Mr. Gowdajii use your commonsense and listen to your conscience. Think as the chief Minister of Karnataka not as the Rubbers stamp of Hindutwa.
    Mr. Gowda is showing his true colour now.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Satish Naik, Vitla/Dubai

    Sun, Sep 11 2011

    Actually the central govt totally failed to make lokpal bill.instead of lokpal bill , they are offering communal violence bill. So that govt doing attention for the general public through this bill instead of lokpalbill,these all political gimick.Finally no one bill will pass in the parliament.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Kamal Taiyyeb, Mangalore

    Mon, Sep 12 2011

    Actually there was no need for any kind of communal violence bill all these years. It was necessitated by the BJP itself. All Indians lived in peace and harmony until the BJP sowed the seeds of communal violence in India. To start with our honourable leader Advani orchestrated the demolition of the Babri Masjid. Later on so called leaders like Modi, Varun Gandhi, Thogadia and others tried their best to destroy the secular fabric of India. It is rediculous that our CM is asking what is the necessity for a communal violence bill? He needs to be reminded that the BJP and its associates like RSS, BD and RS need some kind of checks and controls to maintain religious harmony in India.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Girish Kumar, Mangalore

    Sat, Sep 10 2011

    Why are we worried about Communal Violence Bill? in one place it is good because it is going to apply to every communities who create's tension.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Dr S.Kamath, Mumbai

    Sat, Sep 10 2011

    Yes This bill is polarising the society .In Mumbai Muslims are considered as Minorities .But in LOcations Like Jogeshwari or just around Andheri station west Muslims are in Bigger Numbers if they create attack on non Muslims then case will be regsitered against Non Muslims and not against the Muslims because Muslims are Considered as Minority in Maharastra .Muslims are a Majority only in J and K and there this rule doesnot apply .This bill is in fact favouring me as I am a Linguistic Monority both in Karnataka and Maharastra but still I feel this is just a Vote Bank Politics by Congress party

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Charles D'Mello, Pangala

    Sat, Sep 10 2011

    Mr. Gowda...polarization of society was done by your own party long back in 1992, when your BJP came to power... It could not survive long, because of your communal agenda.. and it will never come to power again at the centre because you failed to build the Ram Mandir...although you demolished Babri Masjid long back ......YOU GUYS ARE USELESS AND HOPELESS..

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • ROBOT KEM, INDIA

    Sat, Sep 10 2011

    If we go through (in the above article)the Addressing by Mr. Sadanand Gowda and The points mentioned in the Provisions of the NAC Draft......
    It looks like Mr. Sadanada Gowda is misconcepting, misleading and giving contradictory explanation to that of the Draft.

    The draft looks on TARGETED VIOLENCE , but does not say BY MAJORITY OR MINORITY communities.

    TARGETTED/KNOWINGLY/INTENTIOALLY DONE VOILENCE is ALWAYS WRONG, whether done by MAJORITY OR MINORITY- This is the (morality)common conception of a common person.

    Only the law experts can articulate the draft perfectly and better through light on this draft to the common person

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: New Delhi: Communal Violence Bill will Polarise Society: Sadananda Gowda



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.