Maha govt moves SC, challenges Salman Khan's acquittal by HC


New Delhi, Jan 22 (PTI): Maharashtra Government today moved the Supreme Court challenging the Bombay High Court's verdict acquitting Bollywood superstar Salman Khan in the 2002 hit-and-run case in which one person was killed and four others were injured.

The petition was filed in the apex court against the high court's judgement acquitting Salman of "all charges", overturning trial court's order sentencing him for five years.

"The Bombay High Court has erred in not appreciating the prosecution evidence. The trial court's order convicting Salman Khan was correct and should be upheld," Sandeep Shinde, the public prosecutor who has been associated with the case, said about the contents of the special leave petition (SLP).

The high court, in its verdict passed on December 10 last year, had held that prosecution had failed to prove "beyond reasonable doubt" that the actor was driving the vehicle at the time of the accident and was drunk.

The judgement by the high court had come on an appeal by the superstar, seven months after he was pronounced guilty by trial court of running over five people sleeping on a pavement outside a laundry in suburban Bandra with his Toyota Land Cruiser, killing one and causing injury to four others on October 28, 2002.

The high court had rejected as "wholly unreliable" the statement of eyewitness Ravindra Patil, former police bodyguard of Salman, recorded by a magistrate in which he had accused the actor of driving under the influence of liquor.

The judge had said that Patil was a "wholly unreliable" witness because he had subsequently made "improvements" in his statement to the magistrate.

Patil, the first informant in the case, in the FIR filed soon after the accident had not accused Salman of having consumed liquor but only said he was "speeding" against his advice.

The prosecution's case during the trial had firmly rested on the statement of Patil, who died in 2007, much before the case was tried afresh under more serious charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

The magistrate's court had conducted the trial for a much lesser offence of causing death by rash and negligent driving. On May 6 last year, a sessions court had convicted Salman in the case in which one person was killed and four others were injured when his vehicle had crushed them when they were asleep on a pavement outside a laundry.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Promenade Road,Fraze Town,B'lore 560005

    Sat, Jan 23 2016

    No comments,let us wait for the decision of the Supreme Court.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincy, BANGKOK

    Sat, Jan 23 2016

    Bollywood mei bahut paisa hai,Hamei kya miltha hai? Chalo Aur thoda koshish Karthe Hain,Hamara Kya jaatha hai?

    DisAgree [2] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Stan, Udupi/ Dubai

    Sat, Jan 23 2016

    When the police themselves have admitted serious lapses in the investigation , what the SC can do. Their move is to just fool people of the nation that they did everything for his conviction, but courts let him free.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • MASTHAN, DUB

    Sat, Jan 23 2016

    AFTER HIGH COURT, THEN WHICH COURT.

    DisAgree [2] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • JNB, Bejai

    Sat, Jan 23 2016

    Law is acting upon your income and expenditure account.

    If your income is negative: you gone case.
    If your income is positive: you are the winner of case.
    see all celbraties:
    *Sanjay Dutt (somany paroles in 1 year) and will be released on a good character >> I do not know what CHARACTER or ACTOR
    ** Saif Ali Khan : hitting a INdo-African businessman in Taj Hotel till he bleeds : what case? even after strong evidence
    *** Salman Khan :fuly taking advantage of case and enjoying his his days >>> even that Land cruiser he purchased illeagally>> which belongs to a Keralite NRE return he is not allowed to sell that till 2 years since it imported on a TRR basis.
    anything is possible

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ilyas, Qatar

    Sat, Jan 23 2016

    Kuch kam danda nahi hoga matha govt ke pass

    DisAgree [10] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Hussain, Abudhabi

    Sat, Jan 23 2016

    Sab Naatak hai ...Dikhaawa hai...We all know what will be the outcome of it...Then why this Kolaveri

    DisAgree [9] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sat, Jan 23 2016

    Salman Khan is a Brand Ambassador for "Swachh Bharat Abhiyan" ...

    DisAgree [12] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Krish, Dubai

    Sun, Jan 24 2016

    Did any one denied ?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Santan Mascarenhas, Kinnigoli/Mumbai

    Sat, Jan 23 2016

    Looking at the image of Katrina Kaif in Kapil's Comedy Nights, Salman Khan laughed and joked "What purpose does it serve to have her picture around ? She is of no use to you, she was of no use to me also."
    Same way, what is the use of going to SC, the masala in the case is already diluted by the power of money and does not have any strength to nail him.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • lukas, malpe

    Sat, Jan 23 2016

    I think nothing going to happen once police department and all investigation agency destroyed the evidence by taking money from the accused even main witness was died may be because of some wrong treatment or medicine by the doctors, even Jodhapur case also one witness died of accident.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Maha govt moves SC, challenges Salman Khan's acquittal by HC



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.