Shiv Sena at 50: From militant chauvinism to mid-life blues


By Quaid Najmi

Mumbai, Jun 18 (IANS): It was a cool rainy day on June 19, 1966, that a frail, young political cartoonist with fiery eyes assembled a loose 'Army of Shivaji' and launched the Shiv Sena for espousing the case and cause of 'sons of the soil'.

After many ups and down, mostly the latter, the saffron, ultra-right party is now celebrating the golden jubilee of its founding.

A mega-bash is planned on Sunday to mark the milestone, but doubts linger among its loyal soldiers, outside supporters, its allies and opponents and some others who barely tolerate it.

Battle-weary with several causes it championed, depending on the political weather -- pro-Marathi chauvinism vis-a-vis anti-South Indian, anti-North Indian, anti-Gujarati, its all-time favourites -- anti-Pakistan and anti-Muslim and self-proclaimed guardian of Hindutva versus 'green terror' and the like, the party finally tasted the fruits of power in 1995.

En route, it was blamed for various ills like communal riots in different parts of the state and Mumbai, blatantly taking sides in the communal divide in the city's mafia with 'Hindu don' versus 'Muslim don' and different types of serious allegations against the party and members of the Thackeray clan.

Before long, Big Brother in the form of then Union Home Minister Indrajit Gupta came to Mumbai in July 1996 wielding a small stick which sent shivers down the spine of Thackeray and his entire army. The party was, once and for all, sobered off its penchant for 'thok-shahi' (mobocracy) instead of 'lok-shahi' (democracy).

It was voted to office first in 1995 in alliance with the Bharatiya Janata Party and in 2014 piggybacking on the BJP, besides a nominal share in power at the centre under both NDA regimes headed by then Prime Minister A. B. Vajpayee and now Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Perhaps out of sheer habit, whilst in government, it continues to run riot as 'the embedded opposition', occasionally even embarrassing the official Opposition parties.

At one point, the Sena enjoyed such a dubious reputation that if Thackeray merely raised his eyebrows, the entire city downed shutters to disappear in a self-imposed curfew mode.

The 'Tiger' Thackeray's personality, his dragon-fire speeches and bold writings through Marmik, Saamana and Dopahar Ka Saamana managed to hold the party together and terrorised all opposition, within and outside.

Slowly, leakages started in the family and the party -- members like nephew Raj Thackeray walked out and formed a new party, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena, and diehard loyalists like Chhagan Bhujbal, Narayan Rane, Sanjay Nirupam and other less prominent ones quit Shiv Sena to join different parties and flourished.

Among the current crop, many potentially strong leaders like Manohar Joshi are sidelined, or retired, some others have been softened with ministerial posts and many more are simply ignored.

The Sena continues to lack a strong party organisation, a support base mostly restricted to some urban centres like Mumbai, Thane, Palghar, Pune, Aurangabad and Nashik. It is still struggling in other parts of the state and obsessed with local level politics to capture civic bodies, especially the prosperous milch cow called Mumbai.

Thus, like the good old days of Bal Thackeray, the jaded 'army' is now looking up to current chief Uddhav Thackeray, who in turn appears to a fatigued 'general', who keeps glancing at son Aditya, as the party totters on behind them.

Apparent contradictions are galore: Shiv Sena harbours national ambitions, effectively put forth by Bal Thackeray, and has even fought elections independently in several states but is moored in regionalism.

It passionately seeks to be the torch-bearer of hardcore 'Hindutva' but is constrained by realpolitik and electoral compulsions, though nobody objected when the late Thackeray was proclaimed as 'Hindu Hriday Samrat'.

Its gen-next is largedly confined to siblings or cousins, or children of existing leaders, with limited appeal among the youngsters.

Sorely lacking a dedicated think tank, the party gets its daily dose of 'englightenment' thanks to the tankful of wisdom emanating from its mouthpieces delivered by the newspaper vendor.

Amidst all this, in its 50th year the Shiv Sena is still fervently hoping to capture the BrihanMumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) and other important civic bodies independently in 2017, and struggling hard to achieve the late Thackeray's dream of '100 percent Shiv Sena' in the 2019 Assembly elections.

Much noise and verbal fireworks are expected during its Golden Jubilee Year, luckily coming when the party is in power. But a lot more effort would be needed to clear the clouds hovering on its future or risk a fade-out on the political horizon.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • NR, mangaluru

    Sun, Jun 19 2016

    GGRRRRRRR
    I am a tiger, how i can help you,
    I don't know help to you poor man.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vinayak prabhu, Mangalore

    Sun, Jun 19 2016

    The nationalists the warriors

    DisAgree [4] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Nashville

    Sat, Jun 18 2016

    Shiv Sena requires 100 people to beat up 1 person and vice versa ...

    DisAgree [20] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dev Kumar, Tonse/Kemmanu/Jullundar

    Sat, Jun 18 2016

    Mumbai is safe due to sena.

    DisAgree [10] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Indiana, Mumbai

    Sun, Jun 19 2016

    I agree with you Dev Kumar ... people should know the difference between Siv Sena & BD, RSS, Ram sena ... Siv Sena Always act smatly

    DisAgree [2] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • John Tauro, M'luru / Kwt

    Mon, Jun 20 2016

    Agreed Mr. Dev Kumar, The SS had successfully maintained checks and control on those northern ‘bindas’, ‘kuch bhi karo chalta hai’ type of troublemakers. Further they have greatly regulated Mallu domination in Mumbai’s workplaces. Today compared to Delhi, crimes are far less and women are more safe in Mumbai. At least part of the credit goes to the Shiv Sainiks.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • sri, Karkala

    Sat, Jun 18 2016

    Shivsena is exactly like pappus party and many of its leaders feel that they are slaves of a family and sometimes want free hand.

    DisAgree [22] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mohammed, Kundapur/Qatar

    Sat, Jun 18 2016

    Adding Tiger Face as Trade Mark Doesn't Make Any Association Patriot, Even Britania Biscuit also Use Tiger Logo...!!!

    DisAgree [22] Agree [38] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Shiv Sena at 50: From militant chauvinism to mid-life blues



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.