Udupi: Fake signature and fraud – case filed against deputy manager of bank


Daijiworld Media Network - Udupi (SP)

Udupi, Jul 6: A complaint stands filed in Udupi town police station relating to an alleged fraudulent transaction put through by the deputy manager of a branch of the bank located in Essel Towers here. As per the complaint, Rajesh Kamath, deputy manager of the said bank branch, had signed certain loan documents to show as if John Castelino, father of the complainant, Johnson Castelino, had signed them.

Johnson Castelino is from Gopalpur, Santhekatte near here. It is said that Johnson Castelino's mother had raised two loans amounting to Rs 45 lac from this bank in 2009 for acquiring fixed assets. Documents pertaining to landed property owned in the joint names of John Castelino and his wife had been obtained as security for the said loans. Although the wife was given power of attorney by John Castelino, the bank people had not asked for it.

When repayment in the loans was not forthcoming promptly, senior manager of the bank's Jayanagar Bengaluru branch, Anand, and an employee identified as Madhu, had called John Castelino and his wife over phone, used abusive language with them, and posed death threats, it has been alleged. John Castelino, who was staying abroad then, insisted that he had not raised any loans and that he would not repay the loans. The bank people then sent a photocopy of loan document signed by John Castelino by e-mail to John. But it was found that the signature therein did not belong to John.

Both the loans were cleared in 2016. Johnson Castelino later grew suspicious about the loan documents and applied to the bank under Right to Information Act, seeking copies of loan documents. He received the copies on June 20, 2018, and found that the signatures on the documents attributed to John were in fact, not his. He found that the loan was sanctioned on November 27, 2008, but his father had visited his native place on December 23 that year. Johnson claims that when sanctioning loan to his mother, deputy manager of the bank, Rajesh Kamath, had put fake signatures of John Castelino with the aim of auctioning the land in case the loans were not cleared in future, as the land documents stood in the joint names of his parents. The complainant also accused senior manager of the bank, Anand, and an employee named Madhu of repeatedly calling them over phone and visiting their house, and thereby harassing them.

A case under section 34,420, 465, 504, and 506 of Indian Penal Code has been filed against the accused.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • U.Suresh, Udupi

    Fri, Jul 06 2018

    Being a banker I know few parties come and plead for the loan when they r in need and assure the bank officials that the responsibilities will be shouldered by them in case of any problem.There r few who keep up their promise considering the risk taken by the bank officials to help them in need.Remaing people forget it and question the authority.Here the main question is why the loan was cleared if it was not taken. Borrower Should have gone to the court chellang the documents and the truth might have come out instead of filing the case now.However it should be a lesson for the bank officials who r carried away by emotions of clients and overlook the procedure.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Reader, Mangalore

    Fri, Jul 06 2018

    I beg to differ mr banker. I think in the above case it is clear that the loan was taken but on one single name. The bank must have willingly put the other name on the loan so as to get business / sales / commission or wateva the benefit mayb. The complaint also reads that the loan was cleared because one person had availed the loan and other persons sign was forged. The loan was "cleared" because of harassment of the bank. Without bank giving documents of loan how can the parties even file a case or even verify facts.

    It is easy for bankers like you to give away free comments. But 45 lakhs is not a small amount to come and beg for also. So bankers like you should use common sense.


    And you being a banker are giving open statement that bank officials overlook procedures. You as a banker must have given rise to a lot of mallyas and nirav modis in your time of being a banker. Bankers dont do anything for emotions sir. Paisa boltha he.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • U.SURESH, Udupi

    Sat, Jul 07 2018

    Loan amt.is not small its Rd.45000/- Lakhs.No bank will release that much amt.without any security.As such he can not claim that the amt.is repaid to avoid the harassment.He was free to approach the police and file a complaint against the bank officials before closing the loan and waiting for the copy of the documents.Nobody restricted him.Why he was silent? sure that the signature was forged but whom is the question.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • J prakash, Udupi

    Fri, Jul 06 2018

    First of all the statement clearly tells the loan was raised and recieved. However the bank in order to pass the loan for their benefit has put signatures to gather business based on documents submitted.

    The loan was paid off because the loan was taken. But the loan was passed fraudulently by bank. The bank NEVER sent loan agreement papers to account holder to hide this fraud and only via RTI the forms were able to be recovered.

    The loan was repaid due to regluar harassment of the bank who did not want to give documents so due to pressure the loan party had to pay the loan.

    Why did bank put fake signatures. If signatures were not put by axis bank why didn bank provide loan agreement papers to customers. Why did customers have to goto RTI to get loan papers

    DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Fri, Jul 06 2018

    Every day one FAKE story after 2014 ...

    DisAgree [2] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rathan, Mangalore

    Fri, Jul 06 2018

    How come the loan cleared in2 016 when the party insists that they have not taken any loan .Why the party paid /cleared loan if he has not taken any loan.
    Whole transaction looks fishy who re paid the loan in 2016 and by which means that is cash / transfer from other account or other branch? If that is found out everything will fall in its place

    DisAgree [2] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Anonymus, Udupi

    Fri, Jul 06 2018

    First of all the statement clearly tells the loan was raised and recieved. However the bank in order to pass the loan for their benefit has put signatures to gather business based on documents submitted.

    The loan was paid off because the loan was taken. But the loan was passed fraudulently by bank. The bank NEVER sent loan agreement papers to account holder to hide this fraud and only via RTI the forms were able to be recovered.

    The loan was repaid due to regluar harassment of the bank who did not want to give documents so due to pressure the loan party had to pay the loan.

    Why did bank put fake signatures. If signatures were not put by axis bank why didn bank provide loan agreement papers to customers. Why did customers have to goto RTI to get loan papers

    DisAgree [1] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • El En Tea, Mumbai

    Fri, Jul 06 2018

    Zyadha Kha Muth
    Taking the advantage of NRI account holder

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • David Pais, Mangalore

    Fri, Jul 06 2018

    ಕಾಮತೆರೆ ಕೆರೆಂಗ್ ಪೋಡಿ ಮಾರ್ಲೆ

    DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rathan, Mangalore

    Fri, Jul 06 2018

    David
    Don't blame kamath(s )for this .first nobody knows the whole story as it looks fishy and created one as at one point it is mentioned that party refuses ha ing taken loan and in 2016 the loan is cleared who paid ? Mr pais paid ?

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Bengaluru/Katapadi

    Fri, Jul 06 2018

    Frauds in the bank to be strictly dealt with since banks work with public deposits

    DisAgree Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Roshan, Mangalore

    Fri, Jul 06 2018

    Padle pett

    DisAgree Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • ca girishkk, m'lore/dxb

    Fri, Jul 06 2018

    one more instance of FKUISM......!!!!
    Hindustan is hit by & suffering from FEKU virus....

    DisAgree [2] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • NEETH, MANGALORE

    Fri, Jul 06 2018

    These days a lot of fakes, Gandhi is also not spared

    DisAgree [1] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Udupi: Fake signature and fraud – case filed against deputy manager of bank



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.