Yogi govt not to take down hoardings, to challenge HC order


Lucknow, Mar 10 (IANS): The Yogi Adityanath government in Uttar Pradesh has not removed the controversial hoardings, naming and shaming those accused of violence during protests against the citizenship laws, despite the high court order.

Sources said that the Chief Minister has asked the law officials to prepare a petition challenging the high court order.

The petition would be filed later this week.

The Allahabad High Court, on Monday, had said that the government's move to display photographs and personal details of the accused on roadside hoardings was 'an unwarranted interference in privacy'.

Asking the government to remove the posters "forthwith", the court had asked it to submit a compliance report to the registrar general by March 16.

Shalabh Mani Tripathi, media advisor to Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, said, "We are examining the Allahabad High Court order. It is being examined on what basis the order was passed to remove the posters. Our experts are examining it."

He further said, "The government will decide what option to go for. The Chief Minister has to take the decision... But it is a fact that none of the people, who damaged public properties, will be spared."

Another media adviser, Mritunjay Kumar, in a tweet, said, "The high court order on removing the posters of the rioters should be understood in the right perspective. Only their poster can be removed, not the cases filed against them."

Admitting that the court is 'above all', he spoke of 'many options'.

The state government had questioned the grounds of the High Court taking up the matter, contending that the court had 'erred in invoking public interest jurisdiction'.

In response, the judges had said, 'Courts are meant to impart justice and no court can shut its eyes if a public injustice is happening just before it'.

The judges said they were not concerned with the validity of the compensation, but 'to the act against the disclosure of personal details of the accused persons'.

Pulling up the state government, the court, in its judgment, had said the issue in question was 'not about personal injury' to the persons named, but also the 'injury caused to the precious constitutional value and its shameless depiction by the administration'.

The hoardings - in which 57 alleged protesters were asked to pay for damage to public property and warned of property attachment in case of non-compliance -- were put up in various parts of the state capital on the instructions of the Chief Minister, sources said.

Uttar Pradesh had witnessed violent protests against the contentious citizenship law in December last year and a majority of the 22 people who died in the countrywide protests were from the state.

After the violent protests, Yogi Adityanath had spoken of 'badla' (revenge) against the protesters, who have been 'captured in video and CCTV footage'.

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Aloysius, Kinnigoli

    Tue, Mar 10 2020

    No doubt now Gujarat and UP model will spread every state.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • satish, Mangalore

    Tue, Mar 10 2020

    If you vandalise public property- there will be NO excuse of 'privacy' for you.

    you gave it away when you did this act.

    Great move by UP Govt.

    Time for the rioters to pay now..

    DisAgree [12] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • francis, Mangalore

    Tue, Mar 10 2020

    its good that its bieng challenged in SC.

    already in Meerut -UP govt has put more posters today shaming the rioters.

    its not over yet..

    DisAgree [2] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Satya, Mangalore

    Tue, Mar 10 2020

    When you have a goon in the garb of a yogi as CM these things are bound to happen. I hope the court takes stringent action and passes orders to dismiss him as CM. He is unfit as he does not understand democracy and rule of law

    DisAgree [9] Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangaluru/Kuwait

    Tue, Mar 10 2020

    May be the transfer letter for the judges who have passed the order is in progress.

    DisAgree [6] Agree [29] Reply Report Abuse

  • Francis, Dubai

    Tue, Mar 10 2020

    Transfer within this country is expected based on present day norms. Loya option can not be ruled out.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse

  • Felix Pinto, Koteshwara

    Tue, Mar 10 2020

    I think, hoardings with pictures of these judges too will be included.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Felix Pinto, Koteshwara

    Tue, Mar 10 2020

    Does it not amount to contempt of court? Or, are there some privileged people who are above any law?

    DisAgree [5] Agree [31] Reply Report Abuse

  • RSRB, Kundapura

    Tue, Mar 10 2020

    Felix Pinto, Koteshwara

    Taking the case to higher court is not considered as contempt of court.... FYI

    DisAgree [7] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Santa, Padubidri

    Tue, Mar 10 2020

    It is a directive from judiciary to goverment.They have to take legal route. Rs 2 drawing sold to 2 crore before 2014.Now everything legal and transperant..hence naming and shaming also.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rathnakara A, Shirva

    Tue, Mar 10 2020

    HC please issue similar notice to all banks, which posts loan defaulters photo, also all police stations to remove the photos of criminals and goondas.

    DisAgree [15] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Mangaluru/Kuwait

    Tue, Mar 10 2020

    Challenging judiciary ? As good as challenging the secular constitution.
    Aage dekho kya hota hai ????
    We hate dictatorship or authoritarian rule.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [39] Reply Report Abuse

  • Joe, Mangalore

    Fri, Mar 13 2020

    Please read the article thoroughly and then comment and for your information filing your appeal in higher courts is not dictatorship or authoritarian rule.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Yogi govt not to take down hoardings, to challenge HC order



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.