Hindu, Christian women 'marketed' by Pak as 'concubines' in China: US official


By Arul Louis

New York, Dec 9 (IANS): Pakistan is marketing Hindu and Christian women as "concubines" and "forced brides" to China, according to the top US diplomat for religious freedom, Samuel Brownback.

One of the sources of "forced brides" for Chinese men are "religious minorities, Christian and Hindu women, being marketed as concubines and as forced as brides into China", Brownback told reporters on Tuesday.

That was happening "because there's not effective support and there's discrimination against religious minorities that make them more vulnerable," he said.

He mentioned this as one of the reasons for designating Pakistan as a country of particular concern (CPC) under the International Religious Freedom Act.

Because of the one-child policy imposed by China for decades, there is an acute shortage of women given the cultural preference for boys leading to Chinese men importing women from other countries as brides, mistresses and labourers.

The US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) had recommended placing India also on the CPC, citing among other issues the Citizenship Amendement Act (CAA), but Secretary of State Mike Pompeo rejected the suggestion when he announced the designations on Monday.

Brownback, however, said that Washington was watching the Indian situation closely and "these issues have been raised in private discussions at the government, high government level, and they will continue to get raised".

The CAA expedites citizenship for Hindus, Christians, Buddhists and Sikhs fleeing religious persecution in neighbouring Islamic or Muslim majority countries but does not prevent Muslims from getting citizenship after following the usual procedures.

The US has a legal provision similar to the CAA which is known as the Specter Amendment that is tucked into budget bill giving asylum to some non-Muslim minorities from Iran, while pointedly excluding Muslim.

Asked by a Pakistani reporter if there was a double standard in Pompeo giving Pakistan the CPC designation and not India, Brownback said that while in Pakistan, a lot of the actions against minorities are taken by the government, that was not the case in India.

"Pakistan has half of the world's people that are locked up for apostasy or blasphemy," he said.

He said that in India, some of the actions like the CAA are taken by the government but there are others like "much of its communal violence" and then when they take place, "we try to determine whether or not there has been an effective police enforcement, judicial action after communal violence takes place".

"That doesn't mean that we don't have problems with the statute (CAA)," he said. "The violence is a problem. We will continue to raise those issues."

"Those are some of the basis as to why Pakistan continues to be on the CPC list and India is not," he said.

"These are issues that people spend a great deal of time reviewing and we review extensively the situation in Pakistan in both countries," added Brownback, whose formal title is Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom.

Answering an American reporter's question why Pompeo did not follow the USCIRF recommendation to designate India as a CPC, Brownback said, "I can't go into the decision-making process that the Secretary went through."

But, he said Pompeo is "well aware of a lot of the communal violence that is happening in India as well as aware of the statutes that have been enacted and some of the issues associated with the (Prime Minister Narendra) Modi government and, as I said, he has raised at the highest level, but just decided at this point in time not to place them on a CPC or a special watch list".

Brownback said that there were also "several recommendations made by the commission that the Secretary did not follow, and this was one of them".

Pompeo did not follow the rcommendations to designate Russia and Vietnam as CPCs.

In addition to Pakistan, Pompeo put China, Myanmar Eritrea, Iran, Nigeria, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan on the CPC list.

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • AM, Mangalore

    Wed, Dec 09 2020

    There was one report recently that many Hindus waiting at wagah border since 2 years for citizenship and after announcement of CAA they had a hope that they will get free entry and citizenship. However Indian officials informed them that such notifications still not received and they returned them to pakistan

    DisAgree [3] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • John Tauro, M'lore

    Thu, Dec 10 2020

    There is no provision in CAA that persecuted minorities will be given free entry and immediate citizenship. They have to enter the country with proper identification documents and stay in refugee camps for full five years.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Detective Kushagramathi, Mangaluru

    Wed, Dec 09 2020

    India stands proud for enacting the CAA amendment.
    These women are free to come to India and have peaceful life.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • John Tauro, M'lore

    Wed, Dec 09 2020

    The world knows very well the purpose of enacting CAA and how it will benefit the persecuted minorities from neighbouring countries. People also know that it will in no way have any adverse effect on citizens of the country. The protests and violence were deliberately done after the massive failure of protests against triple talaq and removal of Art.370.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • N Mukkawala, Kinnigoly

    Wed, Dec 09 2020

    still people want to support Religious bigots in once such a peaceful India .

    DisAgree [7] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Hindu, Christian women 'marketed' by Pak as 'concubines' in China: US official



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.