China's SC rules in favor of Michael Jordan over trademark dispute


Beijing, Apr 9 (IANS): China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) has overturned earlier rulings by Beijing courts to favor U.S. basketball legend Michael Jordan's trademark appeal against a Chinese sportswear firm that allegedly infringed upon his naming rights.

The SPC ruling prohibits Qiaodan Sports from using the Chinese translation of Jordan's name, Qiao Dan, together with its logo of a silhouetted basketball player, ending an eight-year trademark dispute, reports Xinhua news agency.

However, it still allows the Chinese company to continue using either the logo or the name of Qiao Dan seperately.

But the Supreme Court referred the case, over the use of the logo, for retrial by the State Intellectual Property Office.

In 2016, Jordan won the right to his name in Chinese characters, but the Supreme Court upheld the firm's right to use its trademark "Qiaodan" in pinyin.

Qiaodan Sports said in a statement on Wednesday that the ruling "would not impact the normal use of [its] existing trademarks, nor would it affect normal business operations."

In 2012, Michael Jordan, widely known as "Qiaodan" in China, accused Qiaodan Sports of unauthorized use of his name and identity. He lodged an appeal to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry & Commerce to revoke the trademarks in dispute, but was rejected.

Later, Jordan filed lawsuits against the adjudication of the trademark authority but lost.

Chinese courts originally upheld the adjudication on the grounds that the Chinese translation "Qiaodan" is the translation of a common family name, and does not necessarily refer to the U.S. basketball star's name only. In 2015, Jordan appealed to the SPC.

  

Top Stories


Leave a Comment

Title: China's SC rules in favor of Michael Jordan over trademark dispute



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.