No atonement for sons who don't take care of parents: High court


Bengaluru, Jul 15 (IANS): In a major decision, the Karnataka High Court has ruled that that can be no atonement for sons who do not take care of their parents.

The court also underlines that there is a law to re-establish marriage rights, but there was no provision in law to force a mother to live with sons.

The ruling was given by a bench headed by Justice Krishna S. Dixit on apetition by two brothers, Gopal and Mahesh who pleaded before the court that they won’t be able to pay Rs 10,000 each as maintenance amount for their mother's care.

The brothers claimed that they were ready to take care of their mother and she is being compelled to live at her daughters' place presently.

The bench mentioned the Vedas and Upanishads and stated that it is the duty of the children to take care of their mother.

"During old age, the mother should be looked after by the son. It is preached in Taittiriya Upanishad that parents, teachers and guests are like gods. There is no atonement for those who do not take care of their parents. Before worshiping god, parents, teachers and guests must be respected.

"But, today’s generation is failing to take care of their parents. It is not a good development that such numbers are rising," the bench said.

It underlined that since both the sons are physically, it cannot be claimed that they cannot provide maintenance.

"If a man can take care of his wife, why can’t he take care of his mother? One son is getting rent. The argument of the sons that they will take care of their mother can’t be agreed. There is no law to force a mother. It also can’t be agreed that the daughters are conspiring and forcing her to stay at their homes. If not for the daughters, the mother would have been on the streets."

Justice Dixit appreciated the daughters for taking care of their mother.

The bench also ordered the sons to pay Rs 20,000 maintenance to their mother.

The 84-year-old Venkatamma from Mysuru was living with her daughters. After leaving her son's residence, she had approached the divisional officer in Mysuru maintenance from Gopal and Mahesh

As per the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, the order was given for the sons to provide Rs 5,000 each to their mother.

The District Commissioner later had increased the maintenance amount from Rs 5,000 to Rs 10,000 each.

The brothers challenging this order had approached the High Court and claimed that they won’t pay the maintenance but they will take care of their mother instead.

 

 

 

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Ronald D'Souza, Auckland/New Zealand

    Sun, Jul 16 2023

    In this instance it was great that the learned judge took the entire situation into consideration and passed his judgements that is prima facie fair and equitable. If only family and friends took such a balanced approach but alas instead biased judgements and gossip, even refusing to let the truth get in the way of their fake narrative. Even if this judge had not passed this judgement the 'Rasnara' would have done so and He will on all guilty both laggards as children and loose mouth family for unjust gossip would pay the price.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Karen Dsouza, Udupi/Mumbai

    Sun, Jul 16 2023

    Have good karma, behave like humans before your children and raise your children with the right values, these problems will never occur. Parents whose own actions are immoral, unethical, such parents deserve such treatment. The parents should be mindful in procreation, so be responsible and shoulder your responsibilities carefully.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • mohan prabhu, mangalore/canada

    Sat, Jul 15 2023

    The Maintenance of Parents and Elderly Act should be reformed so that the obligation to maintain is shared equally between sons and daughters. Daughters can provide better care for mothers because they know their needs which sons do not understand, and in the absence of sons daughters are their only resort for care, unless they find a place in old age homes. The holy scriptures were ignorant of equality of men and women in law as well as in practice, and that is why the obligation was imposed on sons only. If there were daughters and they are married, their hudsbands' mothers would also be their charge, which is a double whammy! Hon. Justice Dixit should not stop at quoting the scriptures, should go further and deeper.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • PRAKASH.A, Mlore

    Sat, Jul 15 2023

    Its a very complex issue for nuclear families. each and every family situation is different; whether its daughter or Son, someone has to standup to take care of their parents.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Raheja Waterfront

    Sat, Jul 15 2023

    Some Children become alive only hearing Property ...

    DisAgree [4] Agree [41] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: No atonement for sons who don't take care of parents: High court



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.