Mangaluru: Landowner erects fence across state highway in Bajpe, alleges PWD ignored court order 


Daijiworld Media Network - Mangaluru 

Mangaluru, Sep 24: A dramatic situation unfolded at Manjanakatte in Bajpe on Wednesday, September 24, when a landowner erected a barbed-wire fence across a state highway, alleging that public works department (PWD) officials failed to comply with a court order directing them to resolve an encroachment issue.

The incident relates to a parcel of land belonging to Cecilia, a resident of Manjanakatte currently residing abroad. In 2008, the PWD allegedly constructed a public road through her private land without her knowledge, consent, or compensation.

In 2014, Cecilia approached the court against the PWD, the tahsildar, and the revenue department. After hearing the case, the court, in 2017, ordered that the authorities either provide her alternative land equivalent to her property or remove the road and return her land.

Despite this, officials reportedly failed to act for several years. Acting on the court’s order, on Wednesday, Cecilia’s son-in-law, Andri D Almeida, along with court officials Shivaram Rai and Deepak, initiated steps to demarcate the property and dig up the road.

As the roadwork began, hundreds of vehicles were left stranded along the busy Kinnigoli–Niddodi–Ganjimath–Mangaluru state highway. Frustrated commuters expressed anger against the PWD, the tahsildar, and the deputy commissioner.

Revenue inspector Purnachandra and deputy tahsildar Stephen rushed to the spot and held discussions with the landowner’s family and court officials. However, angry locals confronted them, accusing the authorities of negligence that forced the public to suffer since morning.

With traffic brought to a standstill, locals demanded that the authorities resolve the matter quickly, stressing that no alternative road was available in the area and that the highway should not be blocked.

Following mounting pressure, deputy commissioner’s office intervened, and PWD engineer Hemant held talks with the affected family, their advocate Pradeep D’Souza, and court officials. The parties were taken to the deputy commissioner’s office, where Hemant assured that the matter would be settled by evening. Based on his request, vehicle movement was later restored.

Due to the disruption, buses, school and college students, and daily commuters faced severe inconvenience. Bajpe police provided security at the spot.

DC’s office accused of ignoring court order
Advocate Pradeep D’Souza, representing the landowner, alleged that even officials from the deputy commissioner’s office had ignored the court’s 2017 order. He claimed that staff members went to the extent of intimidating the affected party by saying a decision would only be taken after reviewing files. He confirmed that the landowner had no choice but to enforce the court order by fencing the survey land until the case is fully resolved.

PWD engineer Hemant and AE Preetham were also present during the discussions.

Tahsildar’s alleged remark sparks row
It was alleged that deputy tahsildar Stephen, after informing the tahsildar over the phone, relayed instructions to the landowner’s advocate suggesting that the road could be removed if there was indeed a court order. This prompted the family to proceed with digging the road, leading to strong objections from the public at the site.

Landowner’s stand
“In 2008, our shed, coconut trees, and land were taken over for road construction without our consent. In 2018, the court ordered the authorities to provide proper compensation or alternative arrangements. Yet, for over a decade, they have dragged the matter and harassed us with repeated office visits. I am suffering from a heart ailment and cannot run around anymore. Therefore, we decided to act on the court order and reclaim our land by fencing it,” said Andri D Almeida, the landowner’s representative.

 

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • deepak dsouza, Attavar mangalore

    Thu, Sep 25 2025

    The guy you mentioned is henry dalmeida It was a total negligence of authority even after they had a clear order i and henry had approached tahasildar ,AC, pwd officers regarding this It's very bold step taken from Henry Dalmeida I wish him sucess

    DisAgree [1] Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ronald, Mangalore

    Thu, Sep 25 2025

    Ignorance is a big crime after getting our tax payers salary , all involved officials to be suspended and case should filed against them .

    DisAgree [1] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sujith D,, kirem DK

    Thu, Sep 25 2025

    "In 2008, the PWD allegedly constructed a public road through her private land without her knowledge, consent, or compensation." The land owner has all the rights to claim compensation as per present land value.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [51] Reply Report Abuse

  • sri_elder, Karkala

    Thu, Sep 25 2025

    I don't think landowner is right here. When some court order is not followed by DC or Tahashildar, then landowner need to file contempt of court petition against officials. Then officials need to surrender to court. Disturbing public road is not a great idea.

    DisAgree [102] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Manohar, Mangalore

    Thu, Sep 25 2025

    Ohh...karkalad anchana. Namma kinnigoli'd inchane.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ashok, Mangalore

    Thu, Sep 25 2025

    How many years suffering

    DisAgree [1] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vicky, Ras Al Khaimah

    Thu, Sep 25 2025

    The owner is absolutely right in his decision. There is limit and patience for everything. You cannot grab anyone's property without there NOC or a suitable compensation. The owner actually can file a case for mental harssement and claim a suitable compensation.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [71] Reply Report Abuse

  • k b r, Mangala Uru

    Thu, Sep 25 2025

    the landowner has to prove ownership by sale deed or inheritance ... he cannot execute a court order unilaterally and block a highway ...

    DisAgree [184] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ann, Mangalore

    Thu, Sep 25 2025

    Surely after proving the ownership the court has given orders. Don't expect to disclose all the documents of ownership in this article. If there were no document of ownership the PWD should have challenged it from 2018.

    DisAgree [6] Agree [68] Reply Report Abuse

  • J.F.D Souza, Attavar, Mangalore

    Thu, Sep 25 2025

    Its nothing but denial of justice. to the party. If the Govt. Officers are very careless and following court orders then who the common people have to go. Its a case of justice given and justice denied case. Why prolong such issues unnecessarily, District Administration should strictly monitor such issues.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [93] Reply Report Abuse

  • HENRY MISQUITH, INDIA

    Wed, Sep 24 2025

    PWD, the Tahsildar, and everyone involved in this matter must be held strictly accountable. Building a road by encroaching on someone’s property is a serious violation, and despite the case being in court for so many years, this family has received neither justice nor compensation. No politician has come forward to support this innocent family—everyone is busy with their own party and politics. This fence-laying drama needs to reach both the state and central governments. Cecilia’s family deserves repeated compensation, and it is their rightful due.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [198] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Mangaluru: Landowner erects fence across state highway in Bajpe, alleges PWD ignored court order 



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.