Rs.2,300 Crore Annual Pay, Pension Package for Defence Personnel


New Delhi, Sep 25 (IANS): The government Monday approved a Rs.2,300 crore per year (about $430 million) proposal to fix the anomalies in the pay and pension of 1.3-million strong defence personnel, 2 million ex-servicemen and another 400,000 military widows, in a bid to assuage their hurt over the Sixth Pay Commission recommendations implemented in 2008.

"The union cabinet has approved the recommendations of the committee headed by cabinet secretary (Ajit Seth) for benefits to ex-servicemen on four issues. The financial implications of the improvements made as per the cabinet decision on the four items are broadly estimated at Rs.2,300 crore per annum," a government official said here soon after the cabinet meeting.

"These are expected to largely meet the demands of the defence pensioners on 'one rank - one pension' (OROP)," the official said.

The approved proposals would be implemented "from a prospective date and payment made accordingly," the official added.

The committee, set up on July 13 this year on orders of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, submitted its report on Aug 8 this year.

The government had tasked the committee to look into issues of defence personnel such as common pay-scale for in-service junior commissioned officers and other ranks and initial pay-fixation of lieutenant colonels, colonels, and brigadiers of the army and their equivalents in the other two armed forces among others.

Its remit also included ex-servicemen's issues such as OROP (that all retired officers of the same rank and service tenure should get the same pension), enhancement of family pension, dual family pension, and family pension for mentally and physically challenged children of armed forces personnel on marriage.

On OROP, the demand of the defence forces and ex-servicemen associations is that uniform pension be paid to the personnel retiring in the same rank with the same length of service irrespective of their date of retirement and any future enhancement in the rates of pension be automatically passed on to the pre-hike pensioners.

The difference in the pension in the same rank occurs on account of the number of increments earned by the defence personnel in that rank. There is also a difference between the pensioners who retired before and after Jan 1, 2006 when the sixth pay commission recommendations were made applicable retrospectively belonging to a particular rank.

The UPA government, since 2004, has on two previous occasions taken decisions to narrow the gap in pensions of personnel who retired at different points of time, particularly those belonging to the ranks of junior commissioned officers (JCOs) and soldiers (other ranks or ORs).

On the issue of OROP, the cabinet approved bridging the gap in the pension of pre- and post-Jan, 1, 2006 JCO/OR retirees by determining the pension of pre-Jan 1, 2006 retirees on the basis of notional maximum for ranks and groups across the three services as in the case of post-Jan. 1, 2006 retirees.

With regard to family pension, the pre-Jan 1, 2006 commissioned officers, honorary commissioned officers, JCOs/ORs would be hiked based on "the minimum of the fitment table" instead of the minimum of the Pay Band.

It was also approved to provide 60 per cent of pension to families of retired JCOs/ORs after their death post-retirement. To retired JCO/OR families getting enhanced family pension or special family pension would be entitled for 100 per cent of the personnel's pension.

Dual family pension too would be allowed to those personnel, who had civilian service too post military service retirement.

Family pension will be continued to mentally/physically challenged children of defence personnel even after their marriage.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • PREMACHANDRAN.V.K, KANNUR/KERALA

    Wed, Jan 23 2013

    PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHETHER DETAILS OF OROP W.E.F. 24 SEP 2012 OF JCOs/ORs WORKED OUT

    DisAgree [1] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • P SINGH, HARYANA

    Mon, Jan 21 2013

    GOOD QUESTION

    DisAgree [1] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • keval, mp

    Sat, Jan 19 2013

    This pension talk has become joke. For elderly pensioner it should be reduced, and younger people it should be increased. The actual benefit is being eaten away by relative, who are well to do. They think it is an extra pocket money....And canteen facility to stopped for the person above 70 years. It is being misused by sons and daughters and grand sons who are well to do.........

    DisAgree [1] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • RAJ BHAWAN PANDEY, VILL-KOLHUA PO-SAMOGAR,DISTT-DEORIA (UP)

    Thu, Jan 03 2013

    RESPECTED SIR, I RETIRED FROM NAVY ON 31 MAY 2004AS A RANK SPO PLEASE INFORM ME THAT WHAT WOULD BE MY PENSION IN "ONE RANK ONE PENSION" SCHEME

    DisAgree Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sqn Ldr I P Gupta, Ambala City/ 1492, HBC, Sector 10, Ambala City.

    Mon, Dec 24 2012

    Sir,
    Revision of pension of pre2006 is highly appriciated. Effected date of this award has not been mentioned in the govt letter. I request that date from which the pension of defence officers are revised and likely date of disbursement of revised pension may please be intimated.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Archana Bhattacharya, kolkata

    Thu, Dec 20 2012

    My Husband served Army & after retirement he joined P.W.D.(State Govt. He received both pensions. He passed away on October 2012. Can I get the both family pension from Defence & State Govt (bengal). Please reply me I'm in great trouble.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • rajesh, lucknow

    Wed, Dec 05 2012

    please tell about the PBOR pay anomaly report and Sergeant grade pay

    DisAgree [6] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • MV Ramana, Visakhapatnam

    Fri, Nov 16 2012

    With due respect to Shri Soumen Biswas, this will be effective from 01-01-2013 if the elections are held in 2013 otherwise it will be effective from 01-01-2014. Be happy

    DisAgree [4] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • M.A.Mazumdar, Hailakandi, Assam

    Fri, Nov 09 2012

    Still need some more clarification about OROP & Fitment table as well as a tollfree helpline no. so that we can clear our doubts....if anyone knows....plz email me...Jai Hind.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • ranganatha rai s, karnataka

    Tue, Nov 06 2012

    sir, aim retired on Nov 1999 from army as a naik rank now am taken 7888 rs pension and please inform me after one rank one pension what is the pension per month. my service length 16/7 .

    DisAgree [3] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • radhakrishnan, madurai/Tamil nadu

    Sun, Nov 04 2012

    my father is an exserviceman & reemployed in TN Govt service my mother is elegible for both pension, now avail only civil pension

    DisAgree [1] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Selvaraj A, Puducherry

    Mon, Oct 29 2012

    Please let me know about the dual family pension entitlement to a widow whose husband had been served both in Defence services and Central civil services respectively.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • CHANDRESH, MUDIGERE,KARNATAKA

    Tue, Oct 23 2012

    This is right time,very good dicession taken by the UPA Govt.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • K.Raveendran Nair, Punalur

    Wed, Oct 17 2012

    The recent move of the govt is welcomed.I think the pension has been made equal for all the three services.The minimum pension for the armed forces be raised to 6000.The DR also be granted in slabs in such a way that small pensioners will get more percentage and hence relief.

    DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • K.Raveendran Nair, Punalur

    Wed, Oct 17 2012

    The recent move of the govt is welcomed.I think the pension has been made equal for all the three services.The minimum pension for the armed forces be raised to 6000.The DR also be granted in slabs in such a way that small pensioners will get more percentage and hence relief.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • NB Roy, N. 24 PGS

    Thu, Oct 04 2012

    Unless a clear cut circular is issued by respective services it is very difficult to know the actual benefits. Authorities are requested to ease the confusions by giving clear informations in this regards.

    DisAgree Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • RAMACHANDRAN P K, KERALA

    Tue, Oct 02 2012

    sare jahase achha hindustan hamara thanks for keeping the moral of X man

    DisAgree [1] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • somarajannair, alleppey/kerala

    Sat, Sep 29 2012

    An happy news to the ex soldiers whose grievances are long pending for consideration. Thanks to the hon,ble Prime Minister and Defence Minister though we are yet to know the details. The old soldiers were came across with difficult situations with less pay and facilities so their dedication needs to be accounted with max consideration and sympathy. The pay/pension structure of PBOR are proportionately less and not much weight age to higher ranks keeping in view of the importance, experiance and responsibility.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • mk singh, hathras

    Fri, Sep 28 2012

    No body is thinking about the PBORS anomalies.Always talks officer anomalies,poor soldiers are crying.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • kuldeep singh , mumbai

    Fri, Sep 28 2012

    sir, we are unable to find the fitment chart where we could find ourself. Kindly provide the fitment chart of the revised pension so that we could better comment on the subject. At present we are not in position to post our comment in proper way.

    DisAgree Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Soumen Biswas, Barasat, Kolkata

    Tue, Sep 25 2012

    This is good news for retired defence personnel. But it is not clear that from which date & year govt approved for giving new pension.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Rs.2,300 Crore Annual Pay, Pension Package for Defence Personnel



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.