'Pass bill on communal violence in winter session'


New Delhi, Oct 8 (IANS): Activists and social organisations Tuesday called upon the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government to enact the communal violence prevention bill in the winter session of parliament.

They said the legislation should protect people from targeted violence by making accountable those in positions of public authority.

The activists sent memorandums to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Congress president Sonia Gandhi, Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde and Law Minister Kapil Sibal outlining 11 points that "must" be included in the communal violence prevention bill.

Addressing media persons here, advocate Vrinda Grover said the common minimum programme of UPA-I held out a promise of comprehensive legislation to prevent and deal with communal violence.

"The promise has not been fulfilled in the past 10 years," she said.

"We are demanding a law to protect people from communal and targeted crimes by making those in positions of public authority accountable, punishing those responsible for perpetrating, abetting or conspiring to cause violence and fair and equitable reparation to all affected persons," she said.

Grover said the draft bill prepared by the National Advisory Council had provisions for protection of victims belonging to minority community.

"We feel every victim has right to protection," she said.

Grover said there were administrative lapses in incidents of communal violence in different parts of the country, including Gujarat, Mumbai and Muzaffarnagar.

"If administrations had done their job, the tragedies would not have occurred," she said.

Grover said the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation of Victims) Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha in 2005 and the government in 2009 introduced 59 amendments but "it remained deeply flawed and entirely unacceptable".

Along with Grover, the memorandum was released by social activists Shabnam Hashmi, Navaid Ahmed, Maulana Niaz Farooqi and Maulana Mehmood Madani of Jamiat-Ulama-i-Hind and former Delhi Minorities Commission chairman Kamal Faruqui.

Shabnam Hashmi said had the bill been enacted earlier, it would have helped prevent communal violence in Muzaffarabad in which over 50 people were killed.

"If needed, we will exert more pressure on the government to pass the bill in the winter session," she said.

The demands in the memorandum, signed by 92 individuals and social organisations, include robust witness and victim protection, recognising people as internally displaced in the context of communal violence and respecting their rights according to UN guiding principles.

The Bharatiya Janata Party opposed the bill in the past, stating it sought to divide citizens into majority and minority categories.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Ramakrishna. K. , Mangalore

    Tue, Oct 08 2013

    In all the household one thing is common. That is - younger Brother, who is spoilt due to too much pampering by Parents, always pinches mild & obedient elder Brother, and then when Elder Brother retaliates, younger will go and complain to mummy. Mummy always admonishes Elder brother only even though fault is that of young brother. This emboldens young brother to go on harassing Elder Brother.
    Same story is applicable to Hindus ( Elder Bro) & Minorities (Younger Bro).
    Therefore, if Communal Violence Bill is placed in Winter Session, then it should spell out clearly that whoever starts the communal Tension First should be held mainly responsible and punished accordingly.
    Criminal mind-set among certain communities OR linguistic group as a whole should also be taken into consideration to decide culpability in communal tensions.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: 'Pass bill on communal violence in winter session'



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.