Modi marital status case: Offence committed but FIR cannot be filed now


Ahmedabad, Jun 30 (PTI): An Ahmedabad court today held that though Narendra Modi had committed an offence under RP Act by not disclosing his marital status while contesting Assembly polls in 2012, a petition seeking registration of an FIR against him cannot be entertained due to a time-bar prescribed for such cases.

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate M M Sheikh of Ahmedabad (rural) court passed an order to this effect while disposing of an application by an AAP leader Nishant Verma which sought FIR to be registered against Prime Minister Narendra Modi for "hiding" his marital status in the affidavit he had filed with his nomination in 2012.

The court said "an offence is committed under section 125(A)(3) of Representation of People (RP) Act by not disclosing facts" about Modi's marital status.

Section 125-A(3) of RP Act deals with penalty for concealing information while filing affidavit and provides for imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months.

The court, however, said as per CrPC section 468(2)(B), the complaint for the offence has to be made within one year in cases related to the violation of section 125(A)(3) of the RP Act.

As the complaint was submitted after a year and four months of alleged offence "cognizance of complaint cannot be taken and an FIR can not be lodged now", the court said.

CrPC section 468 prescribes limitations to non-serious cases where the imprisonment term does not exceed three years.

"No court shall take cognizance of an offence of the category after the expiry of the period of limitation," reads section 468 of CrPC.

Section 468(2)(B) limits the period to one year for filing complaints for an offence that is punishable with a term not exceeding one year. Violation of section 125(A) of RP Act attracts a maximum penalty of six months. 

Verma had knocked the court's door in April this year after Ranip police station authorities turned down his request to register an FIR against Modi for "hiding" facts about his marital status in his 2012 affidavit.

He had also sought action against the Returning Officer of Maninagar Assembly constituency P K Jedeja for accepting the affidavit at that time.

Modi disclosed his marital status and the name of his wife Jashodaben for the first time in the affidavit he swore while filing his nomination for Vadodara Lok Sabha seat this year. He earlier used to leave the column relating to the spouse blank while contesting Assembly elections in Gujarat.
Verma's counsel said they would challenge the order in a the Supreme Court.

"We will challenge the verdict. Even the court has said an offence was committed by Modi. Since we filed the application after specific time limit, our plea was rejected. Now, we are thinking of filing an application in the Supreme Court," Verma's counsel K R Koshti said.
  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • JANARDHANA ACHARYA, BANGALORE/UDIPI

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    Churning Personal issues of someone is very very bad. But one should also understand that how difficult these days to make work life balance when we live in a National and Multinational environment?

    DisAgree [2] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Krishna, Mangalore

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    Can we know the time limit set for such cases ???????????? Hope this is not an arbitrary decision / generalization to save the skin

    DisAgree Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Gangajji, Surapura

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    Maga....

    Modiyarna budadi olullerappe?.Apeda illada lachmida kende alegla gothijjige.

    DisAgree Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Renny Lobo (Rodrigues), Gurpur Kaikamba/ Abu Dhabi

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    Gangajji,

    Eerena appe ammer dithina pudhar enchineye ? Ora panle atthe.. ajji..pls.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Lawrence, USA

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    If the candidate left the column blank in the application, the authorities should have rejected his application. It is not the candidate's fault, but the RO's fault.

    What difference the marital status makes. What about his height and -weight question? If he misstated couple pounds, he should be prosecuted?

    DisAgree Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ralph C. Pinto, Udupi

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    Weight can change during the day !

    DisAgree Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • ShaIKH mohD rizwan, karkala

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    Dear readers,

    But where is the 'Shazadi' which he has found after 45 years just before filing for his nomination?

    Sorry state of second lady of India.

    Jai Hind

    DisAgree [1] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • RAVINDRA, KARKALA

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    SP made UP a mini Pakistan. UP CM may defend him by saying " bache galtiyan to karthe hain"

    DisAgree [8] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • paul dsouza, balakunje

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Jis aadmi apne baare main joot bhol saktha hai , .......woh, desh ke bahre main me kahan...????
    WOW....RSS......theri chatni, dose khe saathe soot nahin hothin. good luck modi & his PLANS.

    DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • India First, India

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Modiji just left marital status column blank while filling application !! Election commission would have asked him to fill the column then or would have rejected his application !! If it is offence yes, it is but not of Modiji but of Election Commission.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • ABD, Mangalore

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    DONGI CONGI'S LAST OPTION LEFT TO DEFAME MODI!!!! NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU'LL TRY TO CAUSE DAMAGE TO MODIJI'S REPUTATION,THE MORE HE WILL BE BENIFITED!!!!

    DisAgree [11] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Joseph F. Gonsalves, Bannur, Puttur / Mangalore

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Hendathige Dhroha maadidha.
    Gujarathina janarige mousa maadidha.
    Eega dheisha-kke baragaala evanindha.
    Petrol, deisel bele yeirike....

    HAMEM KATOUR-SE KATOUR KADAM UTAAKE INSAANOUMKO BACHAANAA HAI.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Joseph F. Gonsalves, Bannur, Puttur / Mangalore

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    A person who couldn't sustain his own family and lied to Election Commission what Acchhe Dhin will be expected from character lost person and sustain a nation of families.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Girish, USA

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    hendathige mosa madidare deshadalli male barudilla...

    DisAgree [6] Agree [35] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh, Puttur

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    "ಕುಂಬಳಕಾಯಿಗೆ ಕುಬ್ಬುನದ ಕಟ್ಟಕೊಟ್ಟರೆ ಕೊಳೆವುದಲ್ಲದೇ ಬಲಹಾಗ ಬಲ್ಲುದೇ ?"

    DisAgree [6] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • haris, dubai

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    Wow.

    Ramesh Sir.Fantastic comment.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • sathish, MANGALORE/BAHRAIN

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    His maritial status is not important for the developement of the country,,,,,thats personnel.

    DisAgree [50] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mapusa

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Satish, If his character is questionable what development can we expect ...

    DisAgree [12] Agree [50] Reply Report Abuse

  • R.C.Kamath, Mangalore

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    Marital Status : " deserter ".

    DisAgree [1] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • prem, moodbidri

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    @ sathish,
    when non-BJP politicians have an affair or marries twice,thrice, you don't call it personal matter!

    tum karo to pyar,
    hum karen to hatyachaar?

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mapusa

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Thank God they admitted offense has been COMMITTED. Now lets us listen to his cronies defense...

    DisAgree [12] Agree [36] Reply Report Abuse

  • Raj, Mangalore

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    Sick of your comments jossey. A human being has always have two sides like coins. Positive and negative. You don't possess both . So you are the biggest feku... Feku maharaja

    DisAgree [12] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • rayan james, mangalore

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    Dear jossey .
    I have always come across your comments , every one has got right to express and you do the same .. happy for that .

    But .

    your are such a person who never can be positive in life , might be the loved ones of your will regret see at your negative mind set. please change for change, accept few things no harm . Modi is a winner in the race . be happy . Internet is such a thing whole world monitors it , and your cheap sense of mind set gives a negative impression on our PM ( which mite be negligible). Live a positive life .. breath some fresh . mite be my long time frustration expressed here on you. and i dont give a Dam ...

    DisAgree [7] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nithin Poojary, Mangalore

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Mr.Janardhan Poojary may not sound diplomatic while taking up issues but there is always a logic and legal point in his arguments....

    Mahatma Gandhi has rightly said: First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • JNB, Bejai

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    It was 'Balya Vivaha' namo is not responsible for somebody forcefully tied knot for him.
    He is sada Brhamachari....

    DisAgree [30] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Hubert D'souza, Mangalore Dubai

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    After 5 years FIR can be filed.Ache din Anevale hain.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • c ferrer, mangalore

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Waste of time if there is a statute of limitation.Supreme Court or even High Court should throw out these frivolous cases.

    DisAgree [2] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • anil, dubai

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    It happens only in India where in you can say lie even in sworn in affidavit n d law is so funny...u can not file case when u cometo know there Iis sumthing wrong instead there is stipulated time frame....stupid law...... better to have time limits for all crimes then so that if PM enjoys with no case for lie let everyone enjoy for all d crimes dey do if no one complaints in stipulated time frame....come on India....jago re...PM is not above d law.....dont put time frame hurdles

    DisAgree [6] Agree [19] Reply Report Abuse

  • Joseph F. Gonsalves, Bannur, Puttur / Mangalore

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    India's shame is an Offensive Leader for the masses e l e c t e d by literates and illiterate fools.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [19] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mapusa

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Even Sachin Tendulkar is not given LBW out in Mumbai...

    DisAgree [3] Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • RAVINDRA, KARKALA

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Dead issues are being raked up by AAP for which voters already given reply. It is surprising that Kejri has not commented on National Herald case involving Rs.2000 crores.

    DisAgree [24] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dinesh Poojary, Kundapura/Bengaluru

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Anna,

    Congress-AAP olagolage LUVVI-DUVVI :-)

    Big loss for both have made them to come closure

    DisAgree [28] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh, Puttur

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Mr.Dinesh

    "ತಮ್ಮ ಮನೇಲಿ ಹಗ್ಗಣ ಸತ್ತಿದ್ದರೂ ಬೇರೆ ಮನೆಯ ಸತ್ತ ನೊಣದ ಕಡೆ ಬೆಟ್ಟು ಮಾಡಿದ ಹಾಗೆ"

    DisAgree [11] Agree [34] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ajith, Mangalore

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    This is bizarre. By the same yard stick we may find Modi responsible for Gujarat riots after some years but cannot be prosecuted because the time for trial expired?

    DisAgree [3] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh, Puttur

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    "ಸ೦ಸಾರ ಗುಟ್ಟು, ವ್ಯಾಧಿ ರಟ್ಟು"

    DisAgree [5] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • RSRB, Kundapura / Singapore

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    WANTED... WANTED... WANTED..
    Mr. Janardhana Poojari WANTED
    for PRESS CONFERENCE please

    DisAgree [14] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Krishna, Mangalore

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    He is looking for you, to arrange his Press conference.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • jeevan, mangalore

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    No FIR ??? It is right time to Dongi congi approach INTERNATIONAL COURT...

    DisAgree [20] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • ISMAIL.K.PERINJE, PERINJE

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Court terms it as an offence under RP ACT!!!Why not FIR?LIAR IS A LIAR!!!!OUR PM IS AN LIAR!!!HE HAS NO MORAL RIGHT TO ADVISE ANYBODY WHATSOEVER....

    DisAgree [8] Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shankar, Mangalore

    Tue, Jul 01 2014

    All UPA ministers were saints!!

    DisAgree [5] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • CONRAD JOHN TAURO, SHIRVA/UDUPI/DUBAI

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Ladyluck good for you.Be familyman.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • jeevan, mangalore

    Mon, Jun 30 2014

    Jai ho Modiji....

    DisAgree [34] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Modi marital status case: Offence committed but FIR cannot be filed now



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.