News headlines


By Nelson Lewis - Bahrain

Bahrain, Aug 26: Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is run and controlled with bizarre characters whose prime motto is to line their pockets and also give fat money to ex-cricketers who are appointed in this body in official capacities, so that they are kept happy and contented.  This is because they do not want these ex-cricketers to spill the beans regarding the inner workings of this organization, which is as secretive and mysterious as England's Free Masons.  Surprisingly, BCCI is not answerable to the Central Ministry of Sports, there are not audit figures published and no one knows what exactly its sources of earnings are and how it spends the money.  Common man should have a right to be privy to this information.


BCCI chief Sharad Pawar and ICL chief Subash Chandra

A few years ago, BCCI said in the Court that the players in the Indian team do not play for India, but rather for BCCI. 

When Sharad Pawar initially heard about the launching of the Indian Cricket League (ICL), he scoffed, saying that they would only attract players who had either retired or were past their prime.  Later, when he realised that ICL was gaining strength each passing day and was able to attract local and international players, he started to use threats and sanctions.

Firstly, Sharad Pawar should realise he has no authority to stop the pensions of players, because this monetary incentive is paid to players for their past services.  These players could sue BCCI in the Courts for stopping their pensions.

By BCCI’s own admission it is a body that does not represents India.  So why does BCCI have the animosity to ICL?  What is wrong if ICL sports teams by paying players princely sums?  Every sportsman has a right to earn a decent sum and live respectful lives.  Many cricketers may feel that the chance of playing for India are remote and may feel fully contented and consoled in playing for just three years and earning good dough to lead happy lives thereafter.  What is wrong with that?  BCCI has to realize that though very few can make it into the Indian team; every cricketer worth his salt should get the opportunity to earn a living.  I recall decades ago, one of the top Indian singers with monopoly over the film industry and would threaten that she would not sing for those film producers or directors, who gave assignments to one of our neighbour’s rising star.  However, today it is heartening to see many singers getting an opportunity to earn their bread.

Let us analyse things rationally.  One cannot tell with certainty whether ICL will prosper or collapse after sometime or few years.  However, the fact of the matter is that ICL will force BCCI to change itself for the better and radically too if it wants to survive.  Cosmetic changes just would not serve the purpose. 

Further, both BCCI and ICL could join hands and arrive at an understanding that they conduct their own tournaments, apart from the Ranji, Duleep, Irani trophies and other tourneys being presently played in the country.  More matches and tournaments are very good as many cricketers will get opportunities to display their talents and prove their worth.  Moreover, the Indian team will always have lots of players who could play competitive cricket and prove their worth, rather than the present situation in the team where players whose shelf lives have expired long ago are still playing.  It is very, very sad to see some of these players who were very good players in their prime are not able to perform today and give their 100% performance due to age factors, being scarred by injuries, etc., which naturally has affected their fitness, instincts, etc.  I do not blame these players, but the BCCI for being totally unprofessional and non-businesslike when it comes to exhibiting players who are 100% fit on any given day, rather than selecting players due to their past pedigrees or performances.  This is amateurish way of selecting teams.

There should be BCCI and ICL and probably floatation of one or two more bodies, so that many cricketers earning enough to enjoy a middle class lifestyle.  This is not the case today.  Imagine with intense competition many good all rounders will be discovered.  Again imagine an Indian team, like the West Indies team of the yore, having four fast bowlers in the team and another four fast bowlers sitting on the bench due to lack of berths in the team and having six to seven all rounders playing at one go.  India then will have a team of fit, energetic and athletic players and not “langdas”.

However, the selection of the team for the country should be done by the Ministry of Sports consisting of its own officials and officials from BCCI and ICL.  However, the Ministry of Sports should have the prerogative to select officials from BCCI and ICL on its own and without anyone's prodding, be it Sharad Pawar or Subhash Chandra.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • A.D'Cunha, India

    Tue, Aug 28 2007

    While saying an absolute "No" to todays commercial cricket, I would say, we have no business to comment other than discussion if one or the other organisation wants to control cricket as a commericai venture. Perhaps it is order to float shares in the stock exchange and let commercialism prevail.

    In my view, sports ventures do not have to strive on profits or payment in crores be paid to the players when hard working and toiling professionals, even after having education does not get paid even a fraction of the sum players are making.

    Love for cricket is onething and the audiences does not have to foot the bill to make the players crorepathies. This is obscene I must say again. It is a sorry state of affairs for cricket. That is the reason ,I do not support commercial cricket or for that matter any professional games based on commercialism and profit making.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • A.D'Cunha, India

    Mon, Aug 27 2007

    Cricket, a gentlemens game, I enjoy immensely but today Cricket has been one of commercialism and for me has no entertainment value. Professional games some may call it, yes its merely professional and with that politics is major part of it. Who's in control, who can make more money and what way one can demand and run it like a commodity or a business. Gone are the days we enjoyed cricket as a game purely for entertainment.

    Unless it re-shapes to its origin, which I doubt it will, I will no longer loose sleep over it nor I support hefty pay and money to the players. Its obscene. As in the western world, every game is played for money and players are paid obscene amout of money.

     I feel pity on those audiences who support this commercial playing mentality. For me, the spirit of cricket will only rekindle when we eliminate the mentality of commercialism and money making. I would rather pay my contributions for those who are disadvtanged in their life, not with their own fault. Lets play cricket purely for entertainment without commercialism.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Joe Britto, Nakre/Bangalore

    Mon, Aug 27 2007

    Mr. Nelson Lewis' s article is appropriate as the current crisis facing Indian cricket. It's time that cricket is managed by cricketers alone . Easier said than done, as there is too much of politics , Economics and Geography involved . But the Cricketers in India may find consolation that the scene overseas and the brains that manage cricket in the once Mighty Windies, or Pakistan or Sri Lanka are none too good either. It's only Australia and England that seem to have stability .

    That's no consolation for India as it's the nucleus point for Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangla Desh and other countries too. So it's quite imperative that our image be kept clean .One would like to see the right combination representing the Country (The Board BCCI /ICL as well as the game itself ), and if NOT - WHY NOT??

    If a state wise analysis could possibly be made, then the true picture would emerge , starting with Karnataka where there is a again a fight for cri-control. Smaller States just fight a lost cause and several promising cricketers die a young death. Yes, it would be nice to see cricketers from smaller states like Kerala,Haryana,Rajastan , West Bengal, North and other zones as well play for the country and not just from West and South Zone. Unless prominent Ex Test Cricketers/Ex Duleep/ Ranji Players come forward and fight the cause under a common leader who knows only to play with a straight bat , only then could we hope to see the BEST team play for India in Tests/onedayers/20- 20 .

    Here again , there is none more appropriate to head than Kapil Dev , since he lead India to the Prestigious World Cup Win . It's he alone who can guide the young cricketers to a better future and most importantly uplift the game in the Sub Continent. It's vital that the Sports Ministry intervene and see the positives and give due weightage to BCCI and ICL and finally it should be only CRICKETERS will win the BAT-tle

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Joel, Moodubelle / Bahrain

    Mon, Aug 27 2007

    Being a cricketer myself, I am really happy to see that there are some people who care for the sentiments of these hard working poor cricketers, who are waiting in wings to play for India. But never ever get a chance to play to their country, because of the present senior players are hand in glove with the BCCI board members in endorsemnts, ads and what not.

    It all depend on who is playing and how long playing, not worried about their performence etc. Now the ICL has ensured that they are not going to backout on these players. Since the ICL has gone to court, I personally feel that the day is not far when the Sports ministry will make the BCCI to produce their audited accounts to the public to see the transparency of their handling the books of accounts. then most of these bosses who run the BCCI show will be behind bars. 

    We Indians must support the ICL before it is too late. I am sure there will be many many good cricketers who will emerge from this ICL project. GOOD LUCK. Warning from people of India to BCCI, that act before it is too late.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • denzil fernandes, dubai

    Mon, Aug 27 2007

    Bahrain's Nelson Lewis is one of the most active on the daiji website. Irrespective of the 'merits' of his comments, one must appreciate his keen interest to participate in almost all topics. One is not sure if this is an analysis or total malice towards BCCI !

    One easily forgets the huge strides taken by BCCI in the international cricket world as a super power and a force to reckon with. Time and again, we have shown our immense ability to organise eye catching International events successfully. We have some of the finest cricket grounds and facilities including the world famous Eden Gardens where every international cricketer dreams to perform.

    Our cricketers are world class record breaking stars and everyone's pride and pleasure. Our officials are second to none when it comes to organising international cricket tournaments. The ICL is a sheer creation of personal vendetta arising from a failed bid to get the TV rights for one of BCCI's earlier cricket series.

    Everyone knows the financial clout of Essel World who now in the name of 'promoting cricket' is trying to uproot the BCCI. The ICL may look cricketer friendly but at the end is keen to lure the advertisers to meet their business interests as well. For sure, the ICL is not a charity house at all.

    If at all ICL were interested, they should have sought a friendly meeting with BCCI and floated the idea of their competition. With due respect and approval, the BCCI would have surely agreed and been happy to cooperate. The need of the hour is not confrontation but mutual respect for the abiltiies of both BCCI and ICL.

    Indian cricket can benefit a lot if both Sharad Pawar and Subhas Chandra keep their egos aside and come forward to herald a new era in Indian cricket.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • John Eric D'Souza, Mangalore/London

    Mon, Aug 27 2007

    Very well articulated by Nelson. It is a well known fact that BCCI though not representative of India had the privilege of representing India because there was no competition. Now with competition in the form of ICL, it is time for the Sports Ministry to appoint a selection committee to a representative of INDIAN team.

    This privilege should be removed from BCCI. BCCI should be divested of the privilege of selecting an Indian Cricket team in the future. Pensions/Indemnity is salary earned for retirement and once this has accumulated in a player’s kitty, it cannot be denied to him for any reasons whatsoever.

    If the BCCI does not pay this to any player who has the amount accrued under his name, it amounts to deprivation of earned wages, which can be easily claimed through a legal process. This does not in any way imply that ICL does not have any non profit motive.

    Questions that could be raised will necessarily lead to the ultimate aim, profits. The question that comes to mind immediately is, ‘In Indian Cricket is the rise of illegal cricket betting, cricket match fixing, due to the desire to fill the kitty and possibly a nexus?’ The next question that comes up is, ‘If there is a nexus, is this nexus between a few players and the betting mafia alone or is the world cricket establishment also a part?

    This is not yet known and we hope may one day become clear. We are also not yet sure, whether, so many wrong umpiring decisions, cricket team ion blunders, surprise decision blunders by captains on winning the toss, have also a part to play with this nexus. Could it be possible? Has all this been possible due to the popularity of the game in the sub-continent, the admirers of the game and hence the potential to raise large sums from the game? Do we want the future of cricket in the hands of money mongers? Or do we want cricket administration through the appointment of a committee of experts, only representing famous ex-India players who hold the position for a fixed term of not more than three years in a lifetime?

    A longer tenure could possibly provide opportunities for development of vested interests. Is everything fair in Cricket at present? Do we want everything to become more fair in Cricket in the future?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Dr Rajiv Rattan, Bahrain

    Mon, Aug 27 2007

    Dear Mr Nelson, Your analysis is very apt ! BCCI should not consider ICL as competition - rather it should be thankful to ICL fo doing what BCCI has not been able to do for years - primarily because of vested interests running the game !

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Alexander Menezes, Karkala/Dubai

    Sun, Aug 26 2007

    The Saga between the BCCI and ICL is widening its scope and jurisdiction in the world cricket. There has been instances of players who are lured to join ICL and we see some of the disgruntled cricketers from few cricket playing countries have joined the ICL and many more are lined up to join the rebel league promoted by Zee and Essel Group in India.

    I have few comments with regard to Cricket in India. BCCI, the private governing body for cricket in India, is functionning with a sole agenda of Commercial interest that is associated with Cricket in India. The people those are governing BCCI are often appear as bunch of jokers to the general public with no basic knowledge of cricket and things associated with Cricketers.Most of the office bearers make a mockery of themselves when they speak about the game with an international media persons and venues.

    Since BCCI is not a government body, then it should not have any reason to oppose the ICL, which according to me has associated with a people who actually come from the crecketing background and knows better than anyone else in this field. As a cricketing body set up to promote the game and look after the welfare of Cricket,

    I don't see why BCCI should get irked over the ICL. BCCI Chairman and the current office bearers, are incapable of handling office for such a popular body like BCCI. This has been witnessed during the BCCI press conferences, as these people are not able to speak to the media properly. Mr. Sharad Pawar, has no knowledge of cricket and currently is incapable of handling his Agriculture ministry himself, hanging on to BCCI for the sake of name, fame and huge money that is involved with this Game.

    He is also accused of bringing his dirty politics, and his personal vendetta in to this gentleman's Game. I personally feel that he should concentrate on his political duties as a ministor of Agriculture and see how best he can work for the development of farmers and their conditions in India. It is really a good move by the ICL to take things to the High Court, so that the court decides what is the legal stand of ICL in front of BCCI. This is going to be a huge set back for BCCI and if BCCI does not function professionally, then there is a huge trouble for BCCI in the days to come.

    I wish, ICL all the success and hope ICL will act professinally and uplift the spirit of Cricket game in India.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: News headlines



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.