Bengaluru: State mulling excise law ammendment to bypass SC directive


Daijiworld Media Network - Bengaluru (SP)

Bengaluru, Jul 5: Buoyed by what Punjab government has done, the state too is thinking in terms of ammending law governing excise goods so that liquor sale can be allowed to be conducted on highways without in any way violating the Supreme Court (SC) directive.

The state government had approached union department of highways sometime back with a request to denotify certain sections of the national highways into local roads. The department is not in a mood to give any concrete assurance to the state that its request would be acceded to. As per information, the state is considering the idea of modifying the definition of 'liquor sale' so that it does not fall under the ambit of the Supreme Court order that has specified distance to be maintained between highways and liquor outlets.

It is said that the state government wants to save jobs of over a lac people working in over 5,000 bars and restaurants located on highways from being driven to streets. It is learnt that the proposed ammendments will be placed before the law department and only after getting clearance, they will be brought before the legislature by way of ammendment bill. Punjab government had redefined liquor sale to make consumption of liquor within the premises of liquor outlets as 'supply of liquor', not sale.

Karnataka government is expected to get opinion from legal experts, with the main intention of retaining bars located in central business district in the city. The chief minister has already instructed five leading departments to consider a way out to help these bars to reopen. During the meeting held at his home office on Tuesday evening, Siddaramaiah asked the departments to find a way out of this problem and suggest ways and means within a week. He also wants opinion about whether it would be enough if the ammendment is brought through a bill or whether it would be advisable to promulgate an ordinance.

The above ammendment adopted by Punjab government has been challenged in Punjab and Haryana high court and the high court has issued notices to the government seeking its response by July 24.

In a separate ruling on July 4, the Supreme Court said that there is nothing wrong with denotifying highways inside cities.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Bengaluru/Katapadi

    Thu, Jul 06 2017

    Every law there is a exception .

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Sandesh, Mangalore, Oman

    Wed, Jul 05 2017

    Somehow they don't want to loose big loot from excise money. In India liquor is sold five to six times of the cost. Just compare the cost which liquor supplied to Ex Military staff or same brand Indian liquor people can get in Dubai, Oman etc. This government is looting. Since it is alcohol no one raising voice. and politicians who wants to drink they get freely from who's work has to be done

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • G.Bhandary, Kaikamba/ Matti/Muscat

    Wed, Jul 05 2017

    Kerala government banned liquor shops and realized later that they lost huge revenue as per the survey conducted by tourism department and reopened many out lets and issued fresh licenses too.

    Drink and drive is an offence by law but shifting bar 500 meters away from the highway will not solve this problem. In any city, town or village commercial establishments are on road side. Residential developments are behind the stretch. while shifting 500 meters it falls under residential area and many organizations are objecting the bar shifting to these areas.
    How the bar owners will manage this situation. shifting to new premises has huge cost implications. Under tourism quota huge investments are made by hotel owners, how they will run their business?
    There are huge number of staff working in the restaurants will loose their earning which is one of the concern for public as well the government. Karnataka state budgeted 16000 cores revenue from liquor sale for this year. how they will meet their target if the Bars closed?
    We respect SC order to prevent accidents. 23 states have different policy on liquor there is no national policy on liquor. If the liquor banned than illicit liquor will be sold in society which very danger. Now Gujarat, Tamilnadu and Bihar banned liquor government lost revenue but still people are drinking. all enforcement authorities get hefty bribes & corruption is at large.

    I think our CM Siddaramayya is acted properly in this matter (since he holding exercise department). Our elected leaders / all political party need to review the situation properly and find the suitable policy or procedure to handle liquor business.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • JNB, Mangalore-Mumbai

    Wed, Jul 05 2017

    When rule came in Kerala 'Liquor can be sold only at 5***** Star hotels'

    Some Liquor Bars changes their board read as " FIVE STAR HOTEL & BAR"

    DisAgree Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Elwyn Goveas, Valencia

    Wed, Jul 05 2017

    What Bogus rule !!!!. If someone drinks in a restaurant at 501 meters from highway he is no danger to cause road accident ? and if another person have a drink at 499 meters from highway he will cause accidents where is the statistically proof of this phenomenon?

    DisAgree [8] Agree [27] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Wed, Jul 05 2017

    Elwyn,
    Even Computers will show the same result ...

    DisAgree [9] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • J.F.D SOUZA, Attavar, Mangalore

    Wed, Jul 05 2017

    I agree with what you have said. The point is it is a Govt. rule Accidents happen if bars are also beyond 500 mtrs. It depend upon the person. Rule is just to close bars.

    DisAgree Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Wed, Jul 05 2017

    Let us all respect SC ...

    DisAgree [7] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Bengaluru: State mulling excise law ammendment to bypass SC directive



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.