Bengaluru: EC does not want candidates to contest from two constituencies


Daijiworld Media Network - Bengaluru (SP)

Bengaluru, Apr 5: Even as assembly election in Karnataka is drawing nearer, debate on the provision that allows a candidate to contest from two constituencies at a time has been hotting up. In an affidavit filed in Supreme Court, the Central Election Commission (CEC) has firmly opined that candidates should not be allowed to fight from two constituencies simultaneously.

The proposal to ban people from contesting Lok Sabha and assembly election from more than one constituency simultaneously has been in discussion since the last several years. However, the debate that is now catching momentum is unlikely to have any impact on the assembly election as the court will be conducting hearing on the case from July this year.

The CEC is of the opinion that allowing a candidate to contest in two constituencies results in unnecessarily expenses for the commission. The candidates who come out victorious in both the seats are compelled to retain the constituency of their choice and resign from the other. This will mean injustice to voters who elected the candidate, the commission opines. It also has suggested that if a candidate is allowed to contest in two constituencies, and when he resigns from a particular constituency, he should be made to meet the expenses connected with holding of the re-poll.

The Election Commission has been reiterating the same stand on this issue since 2004. In 2016 too it had asked the government to bring an amendment to Representation of the People Act and ban people from contesting from two constituencies at a time.

In December 2017, Supreme Court advocate and BJP leader, Ashwini Upadhyaya, had filed application in Supreme Court, asking it to instruct the central government and Central Election Commission to ban people fighting from two constituencies together. The Supreme Court had asked opinions of the commission and central government. The CEC has filed affidavit now. On behalf of the central government, attorney general, K K Venugopal, presented himself in the court and sought time to spell out the stand of the central government, which appears to be yet to make up its mind on the stand it wants to take in this issue.

There have been instances of Biju Patnaik having fought from four assembly seats and a Lok Sabha seat in 1971. N T Rama Rao had fought 1983 assembly election from Gudiwada and Tirupati constituencies. In 1985, he entered the fray from three constituencies, all of which he won, and retained Hindupur constituency.

In the past, several leaders like Narendra Modi in 2014, Indira Gandhi in 1980, and Sonia Gandhi in 1999, had fought in two constituencies. While in some cases, this plan is envisaged as a face saver for the leaders in case they face defeat in the other constituencies, while in some cases, candidates enter the fray from another constituency to split votes. This time, JD(S) appears to be poised to field its state president and former chief minister, H D Kumaraswamy from Ramanagara and Channapattna constituencies.

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • SMR, Karkala

    Thu, Apr 05 2018

    I welcome this decision from Election Commison of India. It makes sensible for allowing candidate to contest from only one constituency.
    When winning candidate unable to retain both the seats as per the provision, bye election become forced choice. No party is liable for the addition expenditure for the re elections but it is taxpayers money goes to the drain.
    Taking 2014 as the base,the cost of holding one election works out to;Rs70 crores per one Lok Sabha constituency and Rs 10 crores for assembly constituency. Rs 1.5 lakh crore estimated amount has been spent on elections in the past five years and Rs 30,000 crore estimated amount spent by government, political parties and candidates in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections.
    75% of the funding for Indian political parties comes from unknown sources. There is practically no way of knowing exactly who donated and how much, at least for those below Rs20,000.
    One of the biggest problem for corruption in our nation is the extravagant election campaigns and opaque funding for political parties are a big contributor to the rogue economy. Forget about the demonetisation, the black money at the heart of Indian democracy is the biggest contributor for all scams in India which only adds by figures beyond the ability of Indians to understand mathematically.
    India is by far the country with the largest number of people living under the international USD 1.90-a-day poverty line, more than 2.5 times as many as the 86 million in Nigeria, which has the second-largest population of the poor worldwide.
    When 30% of its population living below poverty line at 224 million, Can our nation afford reelection worth Rs 10 crores which can feed many hungry stomach, buy medicine for the poor, shelter for homeless and so on.
    Regardless of party affiliation I request every citizen of India to appeal through RTI to amend the law in this regard.
    We Indians also need to think seriously about winning candidate jumping before the complete tenure.
    JaiHind

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Kavi, Vittal / Dubai

    Thu, Apr 05 2018

    If EC allows candidate to contest from two constituencies, then they should allow the people to vote two times. This makes some sense. Otherwise all gol-mall.

    DisAgree Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • taurojohn, mangalore/ malad

    Thu, Apr 05 2018

    Hope Election commission will push for this and also make rules on required Education and upper age limit to contest the election.

    DisAgree Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • John R Lobo, Kaikamba / Mangalore

    Thu, Apr 05 2018

    No need Re- election....Vacant seat has to go to Runners up based on number of votes.....

    Secondly, Sitting MP's & MLA or MLC should not allowed contest till they finish their tenure.

    DisAgree Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jacob Mendonsa, Bangalore

    Thu, Apr 05 2018

    I would suggest even EC should not allow the sitting MPs to contest for MLAs seats & vice verse. If they win MLAs seats, than they may vacate MPs seats & then there will be repoll for MPs seats. Even if they r allowed to contest, the entire expense incured in connection with repoll should be born by the MPs who vacate the seat.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Bengaluru/Katapadi

    Thu, Apr 05 2018

    They may have to take a policy decision in the matter if they incline to apply in our assembly election.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Stan, Udupi/Dubai

    Thu, Apr 05 2018

    If they win both then the whole expenses of by election to be borne by the candidate who made the seat to fall vacant.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh S, MANGALORE

    Thu, Apr 05 2018

    ..Even if they contest from two places, if they win both seat then they have to resign for one..EC/SC has to make Candidate to pay full re-election expenses..

    DisAgree [1] Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ismail, Moodbidri

    Thu, Apr 05 2018

    Right step by EC. They can also ban the candidate for 10 years, if they resign within one year.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Thu, Apr 05 2018

    Only 'Dar-porks' contest from two Constituencies ...

    DisAgree [3] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • G R PRABHUJI, Mangalore

    Thu, Apr 05 2018

    In the mean time they must also bring a new rule that once who have become MLA , MLC, OR MP Should not contest for next term. Then more citizens will get a chance to serve the country.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • Nithin Poojary, Mangalore

    Thu, Apr 05 2018

    Job without personal growth will lack performance.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Bengaluru: EC does not want candidates to contest from two constituencies



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.