Setback for Kerala CM as Sabarimala priests reject offer of talks on SC order


Thiruvananthapuram, Oct 7(PTI): The Kerala government's move to hold talks with 'Thazhamon tantries', the head priests of the Sabarimala Temple, on the Supreme Court verdict on the entry of women into the shrine received a setback on Sunday with one of the priests saying there was no relevance in holding discussions.

The Pandalam royals, the erstwhile rulers associated with the Lord Ayyappa temple, also said there was no point in holding discussions now as the CPI(M)-led LDF government had already taken a decision to implement the top court order.

Meanwhile, protests by devotees of Lord Ayyappa, demanding the retaining of the age-old tradition, rituals and faith of the hill shrine, continued in several parts of the state.

There were reports that the government invited the tantri family and the members of Pandalam royals for a discussion with Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan in Thiruvananthapuram on Monday.

Kandararu Mohanaru, one of the three tantries, and Sasikumar Varma, a member of the Pandalam royal family, said there was no relevance of holding talks with the government right now as they were not ready for a review against the apex court order.

On September 28, a five-judge Constitution bench, headed by then Chief Justice Dipak Misra, lifted the ban on the entry of women of menstrual age into the shrine. There had been restrictions imposed on the entry of women belonging to the age group of 10-50 in the hill shrine as part of its centuries-old tradition.

"We will go for a review petition. Let us know the result of the review... We can hold a discussion with authorities after knowing views of the Pandalam royal family also in this regard," Mohanaru said in Chengannur.

The tantri also took exception to the government's move to deploy women police personnel at 'sannidhanam', the temple complex, and said it would amount to violation of rituals and traditions of the hill shrine.

Echoing the same sentiments, Sasikumar Varma said the royal family's stand on the issue was very clear. "The Supreme Court verdict is wrong. It is a violation of customs and traditions of the Lord Ayyappa shrine. But the government is for permitting women into the shrine without going for any review. So there is no point in holding talks with them now," he said.

The CPI(M)-led LDF government opened the doors for dialogue in view of mounting protests by Ayyappa devotees across the state against its decision to implement the court verdict without going for a review.

Both the opposition Congress and BJP had also come out openly against the LDF government's stand and stated very clearly that they were with the believers.

Hundreds of Ayyappa devotees, especially women, on Sunday took part in 'namajapa' (chanting the hymns of Lord Ayyappa) rallies at Tripunithura in Ernakulam and Tirunakkara in Kottayam districts, demanding the safeguarding of 'sanatana dharma', the tradition of Hinduism.

In Tripunithura, the faithful started the march from a temple dedicated to Lord Dharma Sastha, an incarnation of Lord Ayyappa, at Tamarakulangara in the morning. Chanting the 'swamiye saranam Ayyappa' mantras, the devotees marched through the main roads and ended the procession at the famed Poornathrayeesa Temple there.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • j.anata, Mangaluru / Bengaluru

    Mon, Oct 08 2018

    This issue is becoming big movement in Kerala. All Ayyappa devotee Hindus are uniting together and all rallies are seeing huge participation from women. Difficult days for the CPI(M) cadre

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Rathan, Mangalore

    Sun, Oct 07 2018

    Jossy
    In India Legislature is above Supreme Court as defined in Shabanu Case. More over Supreme Courts is not final as in many cases over years it has Complete "u" turn in any decisions

    DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Katapadi/Bangalore

    Sun, Oct 07 2018

    Quite tough to adopt to the new directives of the court in place of age old customs of the temple

    DisAgree Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • SK, MANGALORE

    Sun, Oct 07 2018

    Let the belief continue whatever it is unless it harms any one in any way after all faith is a matter of beliefs and tradition and inherited. changing the style of functioning by any authority might be embarrassing to many followers. Let it continue unless there is demand for change from the majority followers. We Indian society is tradition bound and changes is not that digestible unless it is good for society.

    DisAgree Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • PEDDA GUNDOO, MANGALURU

    Sun, Oct 07 2018

    Religion is separate issue apart from the politics and court ! religion is build on a emotional beliefs not on facts ! its a belief ! and rituals are created by the peoples emotions to distance their beliefs and protect in a sacred way ! there is no women or men differentiated here !

    DisAgree Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sun, Oct 07 2018

    Supreme Court Order is Full & Final ...

    DisAgree [23] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • nithin, mangalore

    Sun, Oct 07 2018

    Jossy saldana .

    we will not care what suprem court says's

    SC is not above lord ayapa .

    we don't want any other religion people giving suggestion or decisions on this.

    If you enter our temple business we will make sure we enter yours.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Tell The Truth, Mangalore

    Sun, Oct 07 2018

    Nitin..usko humhne thane ka hospital mein bed book kiya huaa hai..
    Glass bhi saath saath rakha huaa hai.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Swamy, Mangalore

    Sun, Oct 07 2018

    If you challenge SC verdict on gender basis then you are against gender equality. Are you threatening to enter others religious places for opposing a humanitarian base issue which is not giving equal right for other sex to worship in god's holy place????. Grow Up Man.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rathan, Mangalore

    Mon, Oct 08 2018

    Swamy
    You don't know ythe difference between gender equality and tradition. Women r allowed inside the temple and not like other religion where women r not at all allowed or allowed to become priests in some other religion.

    DisAgree [1] Agree Report Abuse

  • Mohan Prabhu, Mangalore (Kankanady)/Ottawa, Canada

    Sun, Oct 07 2018

    Jossey,
    Does gender equality trump religious beliefs, in that case religion has no meaning.
    SC order may be full and final, but it creates dissension when it interferes with beliefs. How would you react if women challenge in the SC the church's discrimination against female priests? Wish some women would try.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Tell The Truth, Mangalore

    Sun, Oct 07 2018

    Kerala divided on line of religion. Thanks jaymala for your initative.
    No more marxists idealogy exists.

    DisAgree [10] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Setback for Kerala CM as Sabarimala priests reject offer of talks on SC order



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.