Government rejects JPC demand on Rafale


New Delhi, Jan 2 (IANS): The government on Wednesday rejected in the Lok Sabha the opposition demand for a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) probe into the Rafale fighter jet deal with France, saying there was no corruption, and accused the Congress, "which has a legacy of scams" like Bofors and AugustaWestland, of inventing allegations against a "clean" government.

Intervening in the discussion on the controversial deal with the French aircraft manufacturer Dassault, he said there was no need for a JPC since the Supreme Court had already given its verdict on the process, pricing, offset clause and HAL issue after satisfying its conscience.

A parliamentary committee can come to a consensus when it comes to policy matters but could become partisan when it comes to investigation, Jaitley said, explaining why the government was ruling out a JPC probe.

"Rafale issue is not a policy or administrative or governance matter. It is an investigation into whether it was a clean or an unclean deal. The Supreme Court has said that 'we have satisfied our conscience' about pricing, HAL, offset. What will JPC do in an investigation?" Jaitley said and referred to the JPC that went into the kickbacks in the Bofors deal.

"The committee headed by (late) Shankaranand gave a report saying that they were not kickbacks but winding up charges. The JPC whitewashed the fraud of corruption," he said amid thumping of desks by party members.

"And the JPC is now being demanded by those with a legacy of corruption, wanting to invent allegations of corruption as we have given a clean government."

Taking a dig at the Congress, he said: "The conscience of the Supreme Court was satisfied but the election needs of the Congress were not."

The Congress, which has been demanding constitution of a JPC and staging protests in the house, on Monday suddenly offered to face a debate on the issue on which Jaitley had thrown a challenge to the party.

Launching a no-holds-barred attack on Gandhi and his family, Jaitley said one family in the country whose hands were dipped in corrupt deals was now raking up the issue of corruption in the Rafale deal, which he said was in the interest of national security and the jets were urgently required by the Air Force to strengthen its fighter squadron.

Needling Gandhi, the Minister said he had to be taught from ABC as he had described an offset partner as the manufacturer of plane.

"I did not expect to see such kind of ignorance from a party that has ruled the country for 60 years."

Giving details of the Rafale deal, Jaitley said the current government finalised the deal for the fighter aircraft at a much cheaper price than what was negotiated by the UPA government.

He said there was a difference between the basic aircraft and the weaponised aircraft. "We have got the basic aircraft at least 9 per cent cheaper and weaponised aircraft 20 per cent cheaper than UPA's agreement."

Rejecting Gandhi's charge that the deal was unilaterally decided by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and regular procedures were flouted, Jaitley said all processes were followed including setting up of a Contract Negotiation Committee, Price Negotiation Committee and 74 meetings of defence officials regarding the weaponary requirements.

"The deal was finalized in 2016 after it was duly examined by the Defence Acquisition Council, the Defence Ministry and the Cabinet Committee on Security," he said.

He justified why HAL was excluded from the deal saying the demand of the time was swift delivery of aircraft and the HAL required 2.7 times the man-days required by Dassault.

"Keeping in mind the urgent need of the Air Force, we could not have waited. And price would have also increased with more time taken to build aircraft."

Jaitley said just as it was in national interest to have a public sector company to build aircraft, it was also national interest to ensure quick supply of aircraft to the Air Force.

Countering Rahul Gandhi's charge of a particular company getting offset contracts worth Rs 1.3 lakh crore, the Minister asked how could that be true when the whole deal was of Rs 58,000 crore with offsets amounting to Rs 29,000 crore -- distributed among 100-120 suppliers.

Jaitley accused the previous UPA government of dilly dallying on the deal because of the then Defence Minister's indecisiveness.

He made a sarcastic reference to Antony by saying that the Minister would clear the file "on the one hand" and sought a review "on the other hand". "One hand belonged to the Air Force and the other belonged to the Congress party."

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • SMR, Karkala

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    The UPA was ready for a JPC probe in the Agusta Westland VVIP Helicopter deal although they had a thin majority in the Lok Sabha. But the BJP, despite having a brute majority in the Lok Sabha is not ready for a JPC on the Rafale. Demands for a JPC to investigate the controversial Rafale deal got a boost on Wednesday following the emergence of an audio clip that insinuates that there is a file which implicates the PM in Rafale deal

    1. Does Goa chief minister Manohar Parrikar have a sensitive file on Rafale implicating the Prime Minister?
    2. Why is BJP shying away from a JPC on the Rafale deal?

    Both Jaitley and Modiji run away from JPC. If BJP-RSS worship 'Bharat Mata' and they have even little of 'patriotism' before chanting 'Bharat Mata ki Jai', let Prime Minister Modi should have a one-on-one debate on Rafale.

    The defense contract should be in the interest of the nation. The Supreme Court doesn't have any jurisdiction on this subject. The nation can't be taken granted on the basis of 'Sealed Envelope' and jury is passed on incorrect data without investigations.
    The God of justice may be blinded folded. But citizens of a nation is not blind. When the Supreme Court justice system is in question by the senior lawyers who revolted, transparency of justice is the only solution of the people demand.
    Jai Hind

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Sms, Kundapura

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    If there is no irregularities, then why are you scared? Who stops you to do so? Kuch toh gadbad hai

    Reply Report Abuse

  • anthony, Mangalore

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    The more the BJP and the Modi Govt remains in denial and avoids a JPC probe, the more will the clamor be for a JPC probe and CBI probe monitored by the Supreme Court will get louder and shriller.

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Deva, Pilar

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    BJP is clean Party without any corruption it will agree for JPC after some days i mean 2019 election.

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Swamy, Mangalore

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    Govt rejects JPC demand. Govt submits false report to SC. But claims its corrupt free clean govt. What was the hurry to award other company the aeronautics deal.???. Was country in a war footing???. That too only 36 aircrafts if it was an emergency compared to 120 aircrafts???. JPC could be held on any matters if national interest is at stake, tax payers money is involved and defence doesn't get enough number of aircrafts. Jaitley's speech, claim and argument is full of loopholes and contradiction and can be easily defeated on JPC or by Govt submitting a valid report in sealed envelope to SC.

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Langoolacharya, Belman / Washington,DC

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    People,

    My experience is... more you try to hide...more people want to see it...Rafale included...

    Modi should answer only one question....who selected Anil Ambani to assemble Rafale aircraft's ? and why??...More Modiji avoid to answer this question...more suspicious the deal looks...Modiji says its Rafales decision...but no independent guys believe that...

    In Court of law proof is needed...in people's Court perceptions count more than proof...

    ...Tak...Takk...

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Sms, Kundapura

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    Million dollars question

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Jenifer, Mangalore

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    Irony is that the very man who gives example of Boforse, fought it as a lawyer for years but proved nothing yet didn't fail to claim his fees. If he is so sure of transparency, why run away from JPC ?

    Chor chowkidaar aur chor FM.

    Reply Report Abuse

  • deepak, mang

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    dear blind slaaaaveeeessssss.. open eyes... don't push our country again 15 years backward.

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Manohar, Mangalore

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    Chowkidar chor hai re baba.

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Pai, Mangalore

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    Manohar, Mangalore
    Pappu Maha Chor baba

    Report Abuse

  • Swamy, Mangalore

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    Country is already pushed back since 2014. Banks are shrinking, defence doesn't have enough aircrafts, terrorists are walking inside Indian territory and having picnic, China is already inside our land, businessmen are facing loss and are running away with sacks of money and leaving the country. Does this and many more failures of BJP looks like taking the country forward to you ???????. Recite your election promises one by one. Has anyone fulfilled so far??????

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Navin, Kundapur

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    Dear blind bhakt, why not HAL, why ambani?? what experience does he has in defense deal?

    Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Wed, Jan 02 2019

    BJP back in ICU ...

    Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Government rejects JPC demand on Rafale



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.