EC defends punishment for falsely questioning EVMs


New Delhi, Apr 30 (IANS): The Election Commission (EC) on Monday defended strict punishment and penalty for questioning Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), saying it is necessary to ensure that mischievous elements do not make false complaints that may hinder the electoral process.

Deputy Election Commissioner Sudeep Jain told the media that after any complaint is raised against the functioning of EVMs -- where slip generated by the voter verified paper audit trail (VVPAT) machine shows that vote has gone to the wrong candidate -- the electoral process is stopped.

He said the whole process to check if the complaint is valid takes roughly around 30 minutes during which voting is stopped.

"If there is no penalty for it, then it may be misused. What if 10 people in different times of the day question EVMs?" he asked, justifying that penalty is needed to deter mischief.

Earlier, the Supreme Court on Monday issued a notice to the EC on a plea challenging the legal provision mandating six months' jail for questioning EVMs.

According to Section 49MA of the Code of Election Rules, if a person files a complaint regarding discrepancy in the EVM, and if after investigation it is found to be false or incorrect, then the complainant can be prosecuted under Section 177 of the Indian Penal Code for "furnishing false information". This section invites "six months in jail or a fine of Rs 1,000 or both".

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Anilkumar, Mangalore

    Tue, Apr 30 2019

    This is high handed behavior. If the EVM is really found to be faulty will the EC agree to punish the concerned staff for installing a faulty EVM? Only then they have the right to punish in case the complaint is proved to be wrong.
    Even in sports, every team / player is given a chance t appeal if the umpire gives a wrong decision or doubtful decision. Why not in case of EVM?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Mohammed, mangalore

    Tue, Apr 30 2019

    Urban naxals getting for crying EVM on may 23rd.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sampath, India

    Tue, Apr 30 2019

    Crying time for slaves....to be continued...

    DisAgree [5] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Harold Dcunha, Mangalore, India.

    Tue, Apr 30 2019

    Chawkidar Chor hai. This is proved again and again.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sahil, Mangaluru

    Tue, Apr 30 2019

    Just we question why vote go for different candidate?
    Just we question transperency?
    Just we question malfunction?
    Just we question 50 percentage Vvpat match why you are not willing to accept it?

    If you can not handle resign we paid tax payers money to build the evm not from your pocket.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • mahesh, mangalore

    Tue, Apr 30 2019

    No proof,only talk will not work anymore.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • SAMAD, Mangalore

    Tue, Apr 30 2019

    Desh hi choro ke hath me heto khatre me kyu nai rahega

    DisAgree [2] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Tue, Apr 30 2019

    Who should be punished for delivering hundreds of Faulty EVM's ...

    DisAgree [2] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • Gangu, Kudla

    Tue, Apr 30 2019

    Jossy
    CHOR modi nd daku amith.. Should sent jail if evm found false
    MODI just defends this tactics... What crook man. Mockery of democracy
    Why they won't provide in all evm attached vth vvpat....

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: EC defends punishment for falsely questioning EVMs



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.