Hindus cite archaeology to show Ayodhya site was place of worship


New Delhi, Aug 16 (IANS): On the seventh day of the Ayodhya hearing, the Hindu parties cited evidence based on an archaeological report to state there was a massive structure at the Babri Masjid site dating back to 2nd Century BC which was public in nature and that the structure would be a temple or 'mandap' with pillars.

A Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi is conducting the hearing on the vexed Ayodhya dispute.

Senior advocate C.S. Vaidyanathan, appearing for Ram Lalla Virajman, informed the court that the archaeological study was carried out at the disputed site where the Babri mosque was demolished by a mob in December 1992.

The archaeological report concluded that various structures were found in various layers during the excavation.

For example, a passage to drain excess water resulting from the 'abhishek' of the deity was found.

The senior counsel informed the court about the stratigraphy methodology deployed by the archaeologists to identify the remains from the previous civilization which indicate a massive structure of public status existed which could be used by a large number of people especially for worship. This was absolutely different from a structure meant for private use.

"Besides the pottery, broken figure in terracotta, round vessel with legion... The oldest northwest black polish level (had) Ashokan Brahmi script," argued the counsel, establishing that there have been structures from 2nd and 3rd BC that point to religious structures at the disputed place.

Vaidyanathan also informed the bench that the imagery, sculptures within the structure (Babri Masjid) established it was not a mosque as such expression of imagery was not usually seen in mosques.

Merely because Muslims prayed there does not give them ownership over it, he contended.

Vaidynathan also referred to sculptures on the structural pillars, which he said had images of Garuda flanked by lions. He contended that such imagery was completely contrast to Islamic practices as they have no images of any human or animal in a mosque.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Desh Bhakth, Mangalore

    Fri, Aug 16 2019

    There could be lot of religious items worshipped and structures under that very site over the centuries covered deep under the earth where Babri mosque was built much later over a existing plain land. But can anyone argue with proof that Babri mosque was built by destroying a existing Hindu temple on that site like BJP rowdies razed Babri masjid and now fighting to build Ram Mandir over it?????.....

    These BJP lawyers arguments and citations has no direct relevance to the very core dispute of this case. They are desperately running round the bush with borrowed unrelated claim and trying to link it somehow in vain by bringing in faith, Hindu worshippers etc. Case Pusk.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Mohan Prabhu, Mangalore (Kankanady)/Ottawa, Canada

    Fri, Aug 16 2019

    So did archaeologists who excavated Harappa and Mohenjo Daro, and the bed of the River Saraswati which are in Pakistan. Does that mean India can claim these sites which represented civilizations of 3rd millennium BC to be Hindu sites?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • abdul, udupi

    Fri, Aug 16 2019

    Many sites throughout India will come up now justifying the 10 avatars of Vishnu.

    Probably a big Mahabharath war site may also come up.
    What a show by the chaiwala regime? Jai Hanuman, jai Sri Ram

    DisAgree [8] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Nashville

    Fri, Aug 16 2019

    While I was constructing my new house I found a Silver Bell.
    I wonder if Christians / Hindus / Jains will stake claim over my Property ...

    DisAgree [9] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • David Pais, Mangalore

    Fri, Aug 16 2019

    i have no idea 2 tell. God knows da truth. becoz He is da way, holy, truth & light 2 mankind.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Hindus cite archaeology to show Ayodhya site was place of worship



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.