India flays Pakistan at UNHRC, against any foreign interference


Geneva, Sep 10 (IANS): India tore into Pakistan at the UN Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) on Tuesday for raking up the Jammu and Kashmir issue, saying it had presented a "false" and "concocted" narrative and asserted that New Delhi will accept no foreign interference on the issue, which is its internal matter.

A top Indian diplomat, speaking at the UNHRC hours after Pakistan Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi's address to the world body here, highlighted that Pakistan is the "epicentre of terrorism", which conducts cross-border terrorism "as a form of 'alternate diplomacy' vis-a-vis India.

Asserting that India "firmly believes in a constructive approach to promote and protect human rights", Secretary (East) in the External Affairs Ministry Vijay Thakur Singh targeted Pakistan, saying: "Those who abet, finance and support terrorism in any form on territory under their control are in truth the worst violators of human rights."

She said Pakistan was crying victim when it actually is the "perpetrator" of human rights violations and cautioned the world body against its platform being misused.

"We should call out those who are misusing this platform for malicious political agendas under the garb of human rights. Those who are attempting this speak on the human rights of minorities in other countries whilst trampling upon them at will in their own country. They cry victim when they actually are the perpetrators," Singh said.

She said terrorism and its "abettors" threaten the "fundamental human right to life" and asked the world community to "speak out" as "silence only emboldens terrorists" and "encourages their intimidatory tactics".

"Today, terrorism poses a grave challenge to the commitment of the international community to protect the right to life and security of people globally. It is extinguishing innocent lives and spreading fear and uncertainty.

"Those who abet, finance and support terrorism in any form on territory under their control are in truth the worst violators of human rights. The world, in particular India, has suffered greatly on account of the activities by practitioners of state sponsored terrorism and it is time to collectively take decisive and firm action against terror groups and their abettors who threaten the fundamental human right to life," Singh said.

Talking about the abolition of special status of Jammu and Kashmir and bifurcation of the state, she said the "legislative measures" were taken by India "within the framework of its Constitution" to ensure that "these progressive measures will also be fully applicable to our citizens in Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh".

The diplomat said these decisions were taken by the Indian Parliament after "a full debate that was televised and enjoyed widespread support".

"We wish to reiterate that this sovereign decision, like other legislations passed by Parliament, is entirely internal to India. No country can accept interference in its internal affairs, certainly not India," she declared.

Justifying the steps, Singh said these will end gender discrimination, including on property rights and local bodies representation, ensure better protection of juvenile rights and laws against domestic violence, provide for rights to education, information and work besides ending longstanding discrimination against refugees and underprivileged sections.

On restrictions imposed in Jammu and Kashmir, she said "temporary preventive and precautionary measures were necessitated to ensure safety and security of our citizens in the face of credible threats of cross-border terrorism".

The diplomat said restrictions are being eased continuously and democratic processes have been initiated.

"Despite challenging circumstances, Jammu & Kashmir's Civil Administration is ensuring basic services, essential supplies, normal functioning of institutions, mobility and nearly full connectivity," she added.

Slamming Pakistan whose Foreign Minister spoke earlier, the External Affairs Ministry official said: "One delegation has given a running commentary with offensive rhetoric of false allegations and concocted charges against my country."

"The world is aware that this fabricated narrative comes from the epicentre of global terrorism, where ring leaders were sheltered for years. This nation conducts cross-border terrorism as a form of 'alternate diplomacy'."

Singh also spoke on the issue of National Register for Citizens (NRC), over which UNHRC chief had made some remarks on Monday.

"It is a statutory, transparent, non-discriminatory legal process mandated and monitored by the Supreme Court of India. Any decision that is taken during the process of its implementation will comply with Indian Law and will be consistent with India's democratic traditions," she said.

Highlighting India's rich democratic credentials dating back centuries, Singh said the country, as a responsible member of the international community, "believes in a constructive approach to promote and protect human rights".

She said India believes that human rights are best protected when national institutions are strengthened.

"We do so as a nation of 1.3 billion people, which embodies the highest principles of democracy, tolerance and unity in diversity."

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • ad, mangaluru

    Wed, Sep 11 2019

    You are dead wrong. Art 370 was temporary agreement and part of Indian Constitution and any changes to it had to be done with the people of Kashmir through the Legislative assembly. India through the back door abrogated Art 370, when there was no Legislative assembly, but a governors rule. And the governor was a BJP. A clear violation of Indian constitution and it is illegal. As far as I know No other State had that kind of temporary agreement

    J&K is for Kasmiris. If India had followed the process there was no issue.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Tea Boy, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 10 2019

    In the end both India and Pakistan will be losers by this new found adventure by BJP. World will be deaf to Pakistan's call and its noise will go in vain neither it can do anything else militarily. And how long india will rule Kashmir now with guns in hand nor any development it can do with guns?????..... It will be a long, frozen, cold winter in Kashmir now onwards.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • ad, mangaluru

    Tue, Sep 10 2019

    Kashmir belong to Kashmirians. No one else has a right to it. Abrogation of Art 370 has not done as per the agreement, Legislative assembly has not been included in. Instead of inclusion there was clear exclusion Kashmiri people and Kashmiri leaders by curfew and lock up and clear human rights abuse.

    DisAgree [4] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Kishore Kumar, Mangaluru

    Tue, Sep 10 2019

    ada,

    ...when many of them are terror supporters what else can be done to control the rouge elements who only understand the language of terror. Human rights, my foot !!!

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • ad, mangaluru

    Wed, Sep 11 2019

    In a democracy there is no dictatorship. PERIOD.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dr Mohan Prabhu, LL.D, QC, Mangalore (Kankanady)/Ottawa, Canada

    Tue, Sep 10 2019

    DO NOT take this argument too far. It is like saying Karnataka belongs to Kannadigas , Kerala to Keralites; Hyderabad to hyderabadis; and so son. Do they not belong to India as a Union of States and as the motherland?

    If tomorrow any of the states asks the Union government not to intervene in their affairs, then you will not have a nation. Abrogation of Article 370D was not a purely constitutional matter. Nowhere was it duly enshrined in the Constitution; it was just a unilateral decision of the Central Government which was then in power and no one, no state, was consulted or even involved in the decision-making. The Constitution CANNOT be amended unilaterally by the Central Government; it needs the consent of a prescribed number of states following the prescribed procedures. Any lawyer versed in the Constitutional law will tell you that and I am confident the Indian Supreme Court will agree.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • ad, mangaluru

    Wed, Sep 11 2019

    Art 370 was temporary agreement and any changes to it had to be done with the people of Kashmir through the Legislative assembly. India through the back door abrogated Art 370, when there was no assembly, but a governors rule. And the governor was a BJP. A clear violation of Indian constitution and it is illegal. No other State that kind of agreement

    J&K is for Kasmiris. If India had followed the process there was no issue.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: India flays Pakistan at UNHRC, against any foreign interference



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.