Dissenting judgement on demonetisation points out irregularities: Chidambaram on SC verdict


New Delhi, Jan 2 (IANS): After the Supreme Court on Monday upheld the demonetisation exercise of the government, former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram said the dissent part of the judgement points out irregularities.

Chidambaram in a statement said, "Once the Hon'ble Supreme Court has declared the law, we are obliged to accept it. However, it is necessary to point out that the majority has not upheld the wisdom of the decision; nor has the majority concluded that the stated objectives were achieved. In fact, the majority has steered clear of the question whether the objectives were achieved at all."

"We are happy that the minority judgement has pointed out the illegality and the irregularities in the Demonetisation. It may be only a slap on the wrist of the government, but a welcome slap on the wrist," he added.

He said the dissenting judgement "will rank among the famous dissents recorded in the history of the Hon'ble Supreme Court".

The Supreme Court on Monday affirmed the Central government's 2016 decision to demonetise currency notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 denominations.

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Justice S.A. Nazeer and comprising Justices B.R. Gavai, A.S. Bopanna, V. Ramasubramanian, and B.V. Nagarathna pronounced the judgment on a clutch of petitions challenging the Centre's 2016 decision to demonetise currency notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 denominations.

Pronouncing the majority judgment, Justice Gavai said that the decision-making process cannot be faulted merely because the proposal emanated from the Central government. The bench said there has to be great restraint in matters of economic policy and the court cannot supplant the wisdom of the executive with its wisdom. Justice Nagarathna differed from the majority view, and delivered a dissenting judgment.

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Madhav, Mangalore

    Mon, Jan 02 2023

    This is a joke. What 4 judges said is not correct. Only dissenting judge is correct. So, 1 > 4 as per illustrious ex-FM of India.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Lambert, Mangalore

    Mon, Jan 02 2023

    With due respect to learned judges, I do not understand why for this case Karnataka state contributed 4 judges.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Kedhar, Mangaluru

    Mon, Jan 02 2023

    This fella, Tihar Nivaasi, Ghotalebaaz previous FM, is one of the main reasons for demo! His handling of economic policies, his FIPB Gotalaa, his sons corrupt adventures, his agricultural income details are not lost on the public! This fella had a hand in selling our note printing equipments to an enemy country too!! Highly corrupt and one who has looted like he will live on forever! Wonder how his party tolerates and how unashamedly he comes in public faulting the ruling Government and giving his views on SC judgements!!

    DisAgree [7] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Dissenting judgement on demonetisation points out irregularities: Chidambaram on SC verdict



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.