Guardian, Washington Post share Pulitzer


Washington, Apr 15 (IANS/EFE): The Guardian and The Washington Post were awarded the honour Monday of sharing the Pulitizer Prize in the Public Service category for their news coverage of US espionage based on the revelations of former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden.

The British newspaper was recognised for "helping through aggressive reporting to spark a debate about the relationship between the government and the public over issues of security and privacy", Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism said.

The Post, meanwhile, was honoured for its "authoritative and insightful reports that helped the public understand how the disclosures fit into the larger framework of national security".

Eli Saslow of the Post will receive the Pulitzer in the category of Explanatory Reporting for articles on the food stamp programme.

In the category of Breaking News Reporting, the jury picked The Boston Globe "for its exhaustive and empathetic coverage of the Boston Marathon bombings and the ensuing manhunt that enveloped the city".

The prize for International Reporting went to Jason Szep and Andrew R.C. Marshall of Reuters for their coverage of the persecution of the Muslim Rohingya minority in Myanmar.

David Philipps of The Gazette, Colorado Springs, Colorado, took the prize in National Reporting for a story about war veterans.

Two photojournalists from The New York Times, Tyler Hicks and Josh Haner, were selected in the categories of Breaking News Photography and Feature Photography, respectively.

The award for Investgative Reporting goes to Chris Hamby of The Centre for Public Integrity.

The prizes, created in 1917 in accord with the will and testament of publisher Joseph Pulitzer (1847-1911), are the pre-eminent honours in US journalism.

  

Top Stories


Leave a Comment

Title: Guardian, Washington Post share Pulitzer



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.