Bangalore: Upa Lokayukta’s Appointment Questioned in Court


Daijiworld Media Network – Bangalore (SP)

Bangalore, Jul 20: A public interest litigation (PIL) has been filed in the state High Court, seeking to quash the appointment of Justice S B Majage as the state Upa Lokayukta. Justice Majage had taken over charge as the Upa Lokayukta on Monday July 19.

In the PIL, a person named R L N Murty, who is a city-based advocate, has claimed that Justice Majage’s appointment to the post is illegal as it violates Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Act 1985. The division bench of the High Court comprising Justice N K Patil and Justice A S Bopanna, which took up the petition, said that the same would be heard on Wednesday July 21.

The main contention of the litigant is that a person, who has already worked in an administrative tribunal, is barred from being appointed to any other post of the government. He has pointed out that Justice Majage has functioned as the vice president of Karnataka Administrative Tribunal (KAT) from 2005 to 2008. As per section 11(e) of the act, a member, president or vice president of KAT is barred from being chosen for government appointments. Further, section 3 (2)(b) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act 1984 prescribes that only High Court judges can be appointed as the Upa Lokayuktas. As such, Justice Majage is not eligible to hold this post, the petitioner has contended in his petition.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Abdulla Madumoole, Abu Dhabi

    Tue, Jul 20 2010

    Most probably the appointment of Upalokayuktha will be quashed by the High Court since the main eligibility to become a Upalokayuktha is that he should have served as a High Court judge.Now the PIL claims he hasn't served as a High Court judge. Is it a gross negligence?

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Bangalore: Upa Lokayukta’s Appointment Questioned in Court



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.