Belthangady: SC stays cutting of trees for implementation of Yettinahole project


Daijiworld Media Network – Belthangady (EP)

Belthangady, Aug 30: Green Bench of Supreme Court on Monday, Aug 29 has stayed the cutting of trees in Western Ghats during implementation of Yettinahole project.

Justice Swathantra Kumar presided over Green Bench, which took up the complaint by environment activist K N Somashekar through advocate Prince Isaac for hearing, a day earlier than scheduled date questioned the Karnataka Irrigation Corporation (KNNL) on the basis of whose permission were the trees cut.

“Large numbers of trees are cut by the contractors and KNNL in the project area. This will adversely affect the environment and sensitive biodiversity in Western ghats,” argued the advocate for the complainant. Meanwhile the advocate for Karnataka government informed that the trees are cut only after obtaining necessary permission. The advocate for the complainant said that it is a series of falsehood because of which an FIR has been registered against the contractors and the corporation.

Green Bench which considered it seriously asked that no more trees be cut. “Ten times more saplings should be planted instead of trees that are cut for protection of environment. The number of trees cut should be stated in the next court hearing.” it said.

The court adjourned the hearing to the previously scheduled Sep 21.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • J.F.D SOUZA, ATTAVAR,MANGALORE

    Wed, Aug 31 2016

    First of all cutting of trees in Reserved Forest require sanction/approval from Central Govt under Forest Conservation Act. Such being the case it should be made known whether permission from Central Govt. obtained in advance before proceeding with the Yethinahole Project as it involves cutting of lot of trees from the Reserve Forest. This is a big lapse on the part of State Govt. So Supreme Courts verdict in this is correct. Let the Govt. enlighten the public about the permission obtained or not. Why Govt. misleads the public?

    DisAgree Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues., Frazer Town,Bangalore

    Wed, Aug 31 2016

    May be a good decision if it is not effecting the project

    DisAgree [1] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • John R Lobo, Kaikamba

    Tue, Aug 30 2016

    Certain % of advance payment already swallowed by Cong & BJP politicians from Bangalore and D.K .One lady politician my be got little less and making hue & Cry.

    By the way this project take another 25-30 years to complete & whoever swallowed they may not be ....?????

    DisAgree Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • haneef, Karkala

    Tue, Aug 30 2016

    very good move

    DisAgree Agree [14] Reply Report Abuse

  • sid, mangalore

    Tue, Aug 30 2016

    This is good joke . The whole project is approved without making any study on how many tress will be cut ? how much wild life will be effected and what will happen to the lands which use to get thie water . Whole loads of pipes have been thrown which clearly shows the supplier was favored and every one made loads of money

    DisAgree Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • Flavian, Manmgaluru/Kuwait

    Tue, Aug 30 2016

    And during Congress rule?

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Nashville

    Tue, Aug 30 2016

    India runs because of Supreme Court ...

    DisAgree [5] Agree [34] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rn, Mangalore

    Tue, Aug 30 2016

    dont take much tension about india..!

    DisAgree [13] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • sri, Karkala

    Tue, Aug 30 2016

    Setback for siddu..
    But who is keeping track of trees in the forest? They will sell and make money..

    DisAgree [2] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Belthangady: SC stays cutting of trees for implementation of Yettinahole project



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.