Lord Ram's statue should not be linked with Ram temple: Keshav Maurya


Lucknow, Nov 6 (PTI): Uttar Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya on Monday said a verdict on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute may be a prerogative of the Supreme Court but a grand temple for Lord Ram will be built.

He also said installation of a grand statue of Lord Ram in Ayodhya should not be linked to construction of a Ram temple.

It will now be impossible to install a single stone bearing the name of Mughal emperor Babur, the BJP leader said, days after the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) declared it will not hesitate to launch an agitation for Ram temple at Ayodhya if needed.

"I have clearly said time and again on the issue of construction of a temple in Ayodhya that whenever there is a verdict on Ayodhya, it is the prerogative of the Supreme Court. But a grand temple for Ram Lalla will be built," Maurya told PTI.

"Now, it is simply impossible to install even a single stone bearing the name of Babur there," he added.

Stating that neither the petitioner nor the government can do anything in a matter pending before the court, Maurya said the installation of a grand statue of Lord Ram in Ayodhya should not be linked to construction of a Ram temple. He was referring to Ayodhya Mayor Rishikesh Upadhyay statement last week that there is a proposal to install a 151-metre-tall statue of Lord Ram on the banks of the Saryu river in the town.

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath is likely to make an announcement on this on the occasion of "Dev Deepawali", the mayor said.

In Maurya's view, the matter should be seen as one linked to the development of Ayodhya.

He said building Lord Ram's statue and the Ram Temple movement are two different issues.

"We feel Ayodhya should be developed, and every devotee of Lord Ram also feels the same. In the past 15 years, there has been no development of Ayodhya. After our government was formed, the development of Ayodhya started. Ayodhya will be developed keeping in mind the devotion and faith which Ayodhya Naath (Lord Ram) commands," he said.

Hitting out at previous governments, the deputy chief minister said the government has worked to revive things related to the life of Lord Ram such as the Saryu 'aarti' and the Deepotsav, which had led to a continuous flow of people from different parts of India and the world into the town.

In a broadside against Rahul Gandhi, he said people of the country are questioning the 'janeudhari' (sacred Brahmanical thread) national president of the Congress and are seeking answers.

"On the one hand, he visits various temples only to mislead the people and, on the other, senior leaders of his party urge the Supreme Court not to hear the case until 2019. He must explain his intention behind this," Maurya said.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • SMR, Karkala

    Tue, Nov 06 2018

    Will Lord Ram will be happy with the giant statue when children' government-owned hospital in Chief Minister Yogi's own constituency is dying with lack of Oxygen?
    The just inaugurated Sardar Patel statue cost taxpayers money of Rs3000 crores. The entry fees of Rs350 per head without considering the maintenance cost the break-even can be only achived in 120 years. The Taj Mahal one of the greatest tourist destinations of India can only generate Rs25 crores. The Budha statue in China uses to be tallest in the world till Sardar Patel statue inaugurated less known to the tourist world.
    The initial cost of the Rafale Jet is 525 crores per aircraft. The Shivaji and Sardar Patel is going to cost India $1 Billion. The government which does not have money for Kerala and Nagaland flash floods, these spending sprees is useless. No matter Ram or Sardar.
    The priority of the government should be the welfare of the society, GDP, development, best health care system, Old pension, a strong military and so on.
    What is the point of erecting statues when the citizens are suffering?

    Jai Hind

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rational thinker, Mangalore

    Tue, Nov 06 2018

    Mr minister, please talk about development, stop talking about statues.
    We cannot develop the country only with statues and temples.

    DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Katapadi/Bangalore

    Tue, Nov 06 2018

    Lord Ram statue itself is a religious touch up to prepare for the forthcoming election of the parliament

    DisAgree Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • HENRY MISQUITH, Bahrain

    Tue, Nov 06 2018

    This episode continues till next May. Ram temple issue is active only when election comes.. 🤣🤣

    DisAgree Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Tue, Nov 06 2018

    Can't we have a temple below "Lord Ram's Statue" ...

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • HENRY MISQUITH, Bahrain

    Tue, Nov 06 2018

    Not an University to educate, nor hospitals for the poor. No proper facilities for farmers. They build statues, so their youth may sell pakodas and Tea (chai garam, chai) to visitors.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Beowulf, Mangalore

    Tue, Nov 06 2018

    HENRY MISQUITH,

    This can be said about any religion.

    DisAgree [2] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Tue, Nov 06 2018

    BJP is desperate to fool Hindu's ...

    DisAgree Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Lord Ram's statue should not be linked with Ram temple: Keshav Maurya



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.