The New York Times asks China, US to join in stopping India's Kashmir action


New York, Aug 6 (IANS): The New York Times has appealed to China to join with the United States, and the United Nations to prevent what it called "India's folly" in Kashmir.

In an editorial against India rescinding the special status for Kashmir, the newspaper's editorial referred to US developing closer ties to India and said, "The United States and China must not allow Kashmir to become a pawn in their ongoing disputes."

It added, "On the contrary, they must urgently do what they can to prevent India's folly from escalating into a perilous and unpredictable regional crisis."

The newspaper, whose editorials are mostly critical of India, said that New Delhi revoking the "semi-autonomous" status of Kashmir "is dangerous and wrong. Bloodshed is all but certain, and tension with Pakistan will soar."

The editorial headlined, "India Tempts Fate in Kashmir, 'The Most Dangerous Place in the World'," warned, "By revoking the special status of the mountainous territory, India is courting conflict with Pakistan."

The editorial, which invoked former President Bill Clinton's characterisation of Kashmir as the "most dangerous place on earth," quoted the Pakistan Foreign Ministry as saying, "Pakistan will exercise all possible options to counter the illegal steps," and opposition leader Shahbaz Sharif warning, "Kashmir is the jugular vein of Pakistan, and anyone laying a hand on our jugular vein will meet a frightful end."

It recalled that "Muslim militants, often backed by Pakistan, joined the fray, striking at Indian troops in Kashmir and at targets deep inside India, including a multiday killing spree in Mumbai in 2008 that left more than 160 people dead."

In asking for US and Chinese action, the editorial said, "The fray is not without global implications. Under President Trump, the United States has shifted its favors from Pakistan, a longtime recipient of American aid, to India, which the administration perceives as a bulwark against China. China, meanwhile, has become an ally and financial patron of Pakistan."

The newspaper's editorial positions on most issues are generally aligned with the Democratic Party.

None of the major leaders of the Democratic Party has staked out a position on India's revocation of Article 370 of the Constitution.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Sanjeev Kamath, Udupi / Seattle

    Wed, Aug 07 2019

    Now, Amit Shah is ready to mediate between the US and China for the trade war that's going on.

    DisAgree Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sunil Pinto, Dubai/ Udupi

    Wed, Aug 07 2019

    I thought the Americans were friends of us now. Why are they poking their noses? NYT is a Democratic leaning newspaper...and Trump is a Republican war mongerer...What is the agenda of the Americans? Is it to now give more military equipment / aid to Pakistan, which Pakistan will now gladly accept? India will be forced to ally with Russia then, just like in the 1980's and 1990s ...Remains to be seen what happens. Military stockpiling begins...

    DisAgree [3] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sunil K, Mangalore

    Wed, Aug 07 2019

    Don't know why the NYT has to poke its nose in India's internal affairs. Your issues with Trump don't concern us.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Francis, Shirva/UK

    Wed, Aug 07 2019

    This is non of your business, you should talk about stopping communism in China and
    Shooting of innocent people in the US.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • Krishna Dasa, Udupi,.

    Wed, Aug 07 2019

    Kashmir was existed before Pakistan & India. There was no India or Pakistan before 1947. Cost of annexing Kashmir by India & Pakistan from People of Kashmir was so High, Both countries lost in Billions and billions and unaccountable number of young solders. Let us pray to Lord Krishna not to make us to pay dearly for the sin of scraping gentleman agreement Article 370 and taking away someones constitutional legal rights.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Kudla, Kudla

    Wed, Aug 07 2019

    End of the day its Newyork times. Theres little respect for it. Paid news get published all the time. No one cares. Kashmir is India's asset.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • NN, NN

    Wed, Aug 07 2019

    New York Times editorial is one person's opinion and it is subjective. It is better to ignore him.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rita, Germany

    Wed, Aug 07 2019

    One shouldnt underestimate china.Other side china sel f has interest in kashmir,that no one knows.It has built a fine road between Pakistan and china to transport their articles ,and based there.They have lot of interest n the border of kashmir I think.when two fight,third one will benefit.is the device.They transport raw minerals.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • KRPrabhu, ???????/Bangalore

    Tue, Aug 06 2019

    Don't interfere in our affairs....whoever may be.
    Mind your own business.....

    DisAgree [2] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rathan, Mangalore

    Tue, Aug 06 2019

    Who is this to interfear in the Indian affairs?

    DisAgree [2] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: The New York Times asks China, US to join in stopping India's Kashmir action



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.