Republic TV parent company challenges 'colonial law', SC says go to HC


New Delhi, Dec 18 (IANS): The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to entertain a plea filed by ARG Outlier Media Private Ltd, which owns the Republic Media network, challenging a "colonial era" law to curb free speech, and asked it to move the Bombay High Court.

A bench, headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde and comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian, said the entire cause of action originates in Maharashtra and asked the petitioner why it has come to the top court, instead of going to the High Court.

The observation from the top court came while hearing a plea by the media organisation challenging the validity of the Police (Incitement to Disaffection) Act, 1922. The news channel and its employees were booked by the Mumbai Police for allegedly defaming the police service and attempting to cause disaffection among the members of the police. The case was registered on a complaint filed by a sub-inspector of the special branch.

Senior advocate Siddharth Bhatnagar, representing the media company, submitted before that a colonial-era law is being used to curb freedom of speech. Republic TV had called the FIR an assault on media rights.

Declining to entertain the plea, the bench told him why hadn't he gone to the Bombay High Court as Bhatnagar insisted that the top court should hear the matter.

"Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the High Court. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for," said the top court in its order.

The FIR had said that the accused broadcast a report alleging 'revolt' against Mumbai Police Commissioner Param Bir Singh by senior police officers. The police have termed this as incitement to disaffection among members of the police force and defamation of the force.

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Asif, Dubai

    Fri, Dec 18 2020

    He thinks Supreme Court is his father's property...

    DisAgree [2] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Fri, Dec 18 2020

    SC should not have entertained Arnab Goswamy ...

    DisAgree [7] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • Francis Lewis, Sastan

    Fri, Dec 18 2020

    SC made big mistake giving Bail to Arnab of Republic TV when others are waiting for years to come out from the Jail

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • AMAR NATHAL, MANGALORE

    Fri, Dec 18 2020

    I thought favours granted to the child are also granted to 'parents'. So, why have you come here?

    DisAgree [4] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mangalurian, Mangaluru

    Fri, Dec 18 2020

    An existing law cannot be challenged by someone, especially when trying to escape a mess.

    It does not matter who created the law or when. Until the Government officially throws it to the rubbish bin, it remains valid.

    Some of these people might be surprised to hear some countries still follow the elements of Roman law, created 2,000 years ago. A large number of Latin expressions in Indian laws came from the Roman laws.

    DisAgree [6] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • anthony, Mangalore

    Fri, Dec 18 2020

    Having obtained Bail for Arnab under extraordinary circumstances, Republic TV was of the opinion that the Supreme Court can be cajoled into granting relief to them in all cases involving them.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Republic TV parent company challenges 'colonial law', SC says go to HC



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.