Latest


Ayodhya Verdict - Another Party to Move Apex Court

  •   Mon, Sep 27 2010 05:36:25 PM

Lucknow, Sep 27 (IANS) After petitioner Ramesh Chandra Tripathi, who had sought deferment of the Ayodhya verdict, another key party in the matter Nirmohi Akhara plans to move the Supreme Court for postponement of the judgment for three months to facilitate an out-of-court amicable settlement, a lawyer said Monday.

This was disclosed by Nirmohi Akhara counsel Ranjit Lal Verma here just before leaving for Delhi to move an application in the apex court.

"I am heading for Delhi to move an application before the apex court for postponing the verdict for three months," Lal told IANS.

He is also seeking the apex court's intervention for granting extension to a judge of the Allahabad High Court, Dharam Veer Sharma, who is scheduled to retire at the end of the this month.

Justice Sharma is one of the three judges on the high court bench which is due to deliver its judgment on the Ayodhya dispute. The high court had reserved its verdict July 27 and announced it would pronounce it Sep 24.

The apex court later imposed an interim stay on the pronouncement of the judgment by the high court till Tuesday. The apex court is now scheduled to take a final call on Tripathi's plea Tuesday.

Retired bureaucrat Tripathi approached the apex court for postponing the high court verdict till at least the end of the Oct 3-14 Commonwealth Games. He also sought the court's direction to the parties to explore the possibility of an out-of-court amicable settlement.

He challenged the high court order rejecting his plea for deferring the pronouncement of the verdict so that there could be some mediation for an amicable settlement of the dispute.

Tripathi's petition was turned down by the three-judge special bench of the high court two weeks ago. While two judges S.U. Khan and Sudhir Agrawal rejected the application, the third judge, Dharam Veer Sharma, allowed the plea, following which Tripathi chose to move the apex court.

The high court also imposed a fine of Rs.50,000 on Tripathi.

Nirmohi Akhara is a key party in the Babri Masjid-Ramjanmabhoomi title suit.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Shareef Moideen, Mangalore/Jeddah

    Tue, Sep 28 2010

    Praful, Jeppu,

    The need of the hour is to avoid blood shed and after math consequences of the Ayodhya Vedict, we need to understand that no religion propagate violence and Indian constitution came into effect in late 1950’s and the court will decide based on the constitution and available proofs and court will not decide for something that was existed (if any) 1500 years ago.

    Our duty is to avoid any loss of lives in the name of religion, GOD resides in believer’s heart and as Indians we need to show our secular credentials are intact and both parties should get involved in out of the court settlement. My suggestion is that we don’t need Masjid’s or Temple at the expenses of even a single human life so let them build a hospital, school or a orphanage that will please Allah and Ram and even billions of peace loving Indians.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Nawaz, Bangalore

    Tue, Sep 28 2010

    Hey Praful, Jeppu... I guess you dont read news papers or follow news, as Archealogical department have already done the survey/ Excavation and the High court of Allahabad has taken a decision based on the evidence provided by Archeological department and other facts. Which excavation you are talking about????? Your comments clearly indicates the hatred you have against your fellow neighbours.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • M.Bhat, Sharjah

    Tue, Sep 28 2010

    Dear Shahnawaz. Pls do not use the word ."Gift the land to hindu's".Left it for court to decide.(To make my point clear = Britishers did not gifted the india to us.)

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • shahnawaz kukkikatte, dubai/udupi

    Mon, Sep 27 2010

    The court must decide on the matter and put all speculations to a stop. The issue must be solved permanently. Its better muslims volutarily gift this place to our hindu brothers and build a masjid some where else. Thats most appropriate and need of the hour. We dont need another 100 years police/military guarding this place and prayers have been denied. Lets build a masjid somewehre else and live inpeace with our neighbours and countrymen.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Alwyn, Mangalore - USA

    Mon, Sep 27 2010

    Every citizen have to request what the person feels. The Supreme Court will decide what is the best for the citizens and how to keep the country safe. The court must ask the central and all state governments and law and order departments to give all details how they will handle the situation. If the court is NOT happy and if court feel that there may be riots then Court must ask the president to impose Emergency and military rule for 2 to 5 years. So peace, law & order and development can be made.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Praful, Jeppu

    Mon, Sep 27 2010

    Should not the archeological society start excavation to find out is there was a hindu temple at the spot before a mohamedan masjid ?. If there was a hindu temple and the masjid was built over an existing one, than the mohamedan structure has no right to the site and should be torn down with utmost haste.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Rolson, Shirva, Udupi

    Mon, Sep 27 2010

    We people sitting and predicting 'what is going to happen' & 'what should happen' is a Void thing to do! This whole issue is very sensitive and there are lot of people and stratergy involved, What we see and what actually runs behind the scenes is a very confidential and complicated thing to undrestand!! All i hope, whatever is happening should only happen for good of the people and nothing else... God bless Bharath!

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Victor, Mangalore

    Mon, Sep 27 2010

    It is in the best interest of the nation that the verdict is postponed until the commonwealth games and all the foreign participants leave the country. We should not overstretch the security apparatus of the country just because some people want the verdict to be delivered early. A month or two shall not make much difference to the situation.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Roshan, Mangalore/Dubai

    Mon, Sep 27 2010

    Better to have the judgement immediatly without any delay, & to impose exemplory fine to all parties who file afidavat for postponment of judgement. Jai Hind !

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • M Ashraf, Mangalore/Dubai

    Mon, Sep 27 2010

    Better to postpone for another six month, after six month again for another six month......

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • STALIN MISQUITH, M'LORE\BAHRAIN

    Mon, Sep 27 2010

    GOVT SHOULD TAKE INITIATIVE TO TALK TO ALL PARTY LEADERS AND RELIGIOUS LEADERS FOR MAKING A PEACEFUL ENVIRONMENT AFTER THE VERDICT.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • ISMAIL K PERINJE, PERINJE/YANBU-KSA

    Mon, Sep 27 2010

    justice delayed is justice denied.Is any conspiracy as citizens by regular interval going for postponment of verdict which may jeoparadise the peaceful co existance of two brotherly communities???????

    Positive or negative both communities haven given the promise to abide by the ruling of HC/SC.then what is fuss?????

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Ayodhya Verdict - Another Party to Move Apex Court



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.

You might also like