Husband seeks alimony from working wife, Karnataka HC quashes plea


Bengaluru, Jul 13 (IANS): Karnataka High Court has quashed a man's petition seeking permanent alimony from his working wife.

"The husband with a capacity to earn does not have any right to ask for permanent alimony from his wife," the court underlined in its order.

A division bench headed by Justices Alok Aradhe and J. M. Khazi passed the order on Tuesday while taking up the petition of a resident of Udupi district submitted under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking alimony from wife.

When permanent alimony is sought, the properties and financial conditions of two sides have to be considered. Husband's needs, and petitioners' income and assets need to be considered. In this case, during cross examination, the petitioner has agreed that he has inherited land and also has a share in the house he is presently living in, the court observed.

Wife is working in a cooperative society and is taking care of the education of their 15-year-old son. She requires sufficient money to provide education to him and is single-handedly taking the responsibility, the bench said.

However, the husband, who is demanding alimony, has the capacity to earn and the decision of family court to reject the alimony by husband is upheld, the bench stated.

The counsel for the husband argued that the wife is working as an assistant manager in a cooperative society. The petitioner who worked as a security guard lost his job and was struggling for livelihood.

The advocate for the woman maintained that it is not possible to provide the alimony as she gets only Rs 8,000 as salary.

The couple were married on March 25, 1993. The wife had left her husband before giving birth to her child. Even after son was born, she did not return to him for many years. Husband had applied for divorce to the family court. He had also applied for permanent alimony. The family court had given divorce orders on August 19, 2015 and rejected the demand for alimony.

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Durga Prasad, Bangalore

    Fri, Jul 15 2022

    I wonder what would be the judgement if the gender roles are reversed here. Man earning and raising a kid. Women not working, inherited properties, and having capacity to work.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rohit, Mangalore

    Thu, Jul 14 2022

    Our laws need a massive overhaul looking at present day circumstances. They have to be gender neutral. Feminazi hypocrisy has crept deep into the judiciary and administration!

    DisAgree [3] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • KS Mayya, Mangalore/Bangalore

    Wed, Jul 13 2022

    In a society that tolerates equal opportunity offenders, this is probably fine to go to court with logic implemented in the past alone, but completely bereft of data to support the logic. Wife is working to support her son. Husband who has settled for divorce wants more from Wife. This is arrogance at its best meted to gender that his mother and sister also shares. Kudos to Karnataka HC for seeing through it all.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • real kujuma, kodial

    Wed, Jul 13 2022

    men are always looked down upon by society and law

    DisAgree [11] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • Joseph, Qatar

    Wed, Jul 13 2022

    Prakash, Manipal Two sides of the same coin... You quote "If he looks around he can get any job, only will is required..." unquote Presume he doesn't get a job even after trying would you might as well say he didn't try hard or he had a lack of willpower. The jobs are in the doldrums due to pandemic. Everything has collapsed. What will he do? What would you do? Can you give me an answer? I'm not referring to permanent alimony - get me right.

    DisAgree [13] Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • Deshbhakt, Mangalore

    Wed, Jul 13 2022

    Joseph, no Modi supporter is ready to accept is the financial condition of the nation is in doldrums. On the other day one asked 'if petrol/LPG was cheaper before 2014, wasn't your salary low too ??' How to plain these people that the salary did not go o 100K from 50K as has Petrol/LPG ? Similarly, they aren't convinced about high inflation and lack of jobs. They intend to vote the same party again though the corruption has reached up to even temple priests complain about 40% demand.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rita, Germany

    Wed, Jul 13 2022

    Joseph Qatar,I too support the court.He should feel ashamed to ask alimony from the wife ,who is looking after their son too.Instead he can atleast live the house to them or try to work and support the boy.Nothing does he instead asking from wife ?What a shame where is his dignity ?As a man sit at home and ask support from wife ?When he cant work can sell his land and support sons education.Be a man and show you dont need wifes money.To AbhilashMangalore.when wife first left husband means not that husband doesnt have to support .They must have had their reason for leaving.Court knows it.Not our business.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • prakash, Manipal

    Wed, Jul 13 2022

    Right decision by the honourable court... The lady needs that meager salary and it is the husband who has to support her financially... If he looks around he can get any job, only will is required...

    DisAgree [13] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shankar, Mangaluru

    Wed, Jul 13 2022

    Why doesn't the same argument apply when the wife demands for alimony???

    DisAgree [11] Agree [28] Reply Report Abuse

  • Monty Dotor, Mangalore

    Wed, Jul 13 2022

    All rules should be gender neutral. Important is money not alimony...

    DisAgree [6] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • Abhilash, Mangalore

    Wed, Jul 13 2022

    Disagree with your opinion. Why should husband be supporting the wife if the wife willingly left him and never returned?

    DisAgree [12] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Husband seeks alimony from working wife, Karnataka HC quashes plea



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.