Ex- judges, bureaucrats write to CJI seeking suo moto action against Udhayanidhi Stalin


New Delhi, Sep 5 (IANS): A group of 262 eminent citizens, including former high court judges and bureaucrats and war veterans have penned a letter to the Chief Justice of India requesting him to take suo moto cognizance of the alleged hate speech made by Tamil Nadu Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, who is the son of Chief Minister M.K. Stalin, over his remarks on 'Sanatan Dharma'.

The letter stated that Stalin Jr.'s comments amount to hate speech against a large population of India and strikes at the very core of the Constitution of India which envisages Bharat as a secular nation.

 

It said that the state government refused to take any action against Udhayanidhi Stalin and rather chose to justify his remarks. It stated that the action of the TN government ran in the face of the judgment of the Supreme Court which had directed that state governments should take suo moto action against any hate speech crime without waiting for any complaint.

“Since the State Government has refused to take action and acted in contempt of the Court’s orders and gravely undermined or rather made a mockery of the rule of law, we urge the Hon’ble Supreme Court to take the suo moto notice of contempt, ensuring accountability for the inaction of the State Government of Tamil Nadu,” the letter stated.

Notably, the Supreme Court in the case of Shaheen Abdulla v. Union of India and Ors., observed that there cannot be fraternity unless different religious communities are amenable to live in harmony.

The top court had expressed concern over the growing incidents of hate speeches in the country and had directed the governments and police authorities to take suo motu action in such cases without waiting for the lodging of formal complaints.

It had said that any delay on the part of the administration in taking action on ‘very serious issues’ will invite the court’s contempt as action is needed in order to preserve the secular character of the country.

Udhayanidhi Stalin, had spoken at a function of Tamil Nadu Progressive Writers on eradication of Sanatan Dharma, saying that it was against social justice. He had also said that Sanatan Dharma must be eradicated like mosquitoes, dengue, malaria or corona.

The Tamil Nadu's minister for sports and youth affairs had said, “It (Sanatan Dharma) has to be eradicated, rather than opposing it.”

Later, he refused to apologise for his remarks and justified himself by stating: “I will say this continuously.”

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Gautam Das, Bangalore

    Tue, Sep 05 2023

    Santana Dharma is constitutionally opposing and what Stalin said is legally and socially 100% right. There is no place for discrimination in a democratic society based on caste, creed, religion, gender and status. All are equal citizens with equal rights and the govt has constitutional right and duty to protect the rights of all citizens without discrimination. At the same time it’s the duty and responsibility of all citizens to respect the rights of others.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Linganath, Mangaluru

    Tue, Sep 05 2023

    why anurag takur is not yet arrested by so called sanathana

    DisAgree [2] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • sense_shetty, Mangalore Kudla

    Tue, Sep 05 2023

    Stalin has the legitimate right to express his opinions on any theology or ideology, whether in favor or against. When human thoughts are based on a distorted self-image, it often leads to discrimination, categorization, and division etc etc

    DisAgree [9] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Ex- judges, bureaucrats write to CJI seeking suo moto action against Udhayanidhi Stalin



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.