News headlines


Agency report
 
New Delhi, Jul 10:
President APJ Abdul Kalam's comment that people were looking to the judiciary as their only hope has been criticised as unbecoming and improper by politicians of both the Congress and the opposition BJP.

While launching an e-court project in New Delhi on Monday, Kalam had said society was going through unique dynamics due to the "shortage of leadership with nobility". Read the story

Claiming that the only hope the nation cherished was the judiciary, the President said: "It is said that a nation fails not because of economic progress but because of an increase in decision makers with small minds."

Although he agreed with Kalam that the political class lacked leadership with "nobility", senior Bharatiya Janata Party leader Seshadri Chari said the President was wrong in putting the judiciary above the executive as a solution to the problems the country was facing.

"I feel that putting too much dependence on judiciary is not good for democracy. We have already been witnessing the emergence of the soft version of judicial activism," he said.

A senior Congress leader, who did not want to be identified, said Kalam's "attempts" to give a populist dimension to the Presidency were improper.

"The populist dimension and extra constitutional dimension he has added to the presidency were wrong. He has been seeking popularity, forgetting the fact that his office is of great dignity where restraint is the highest quality," he said.

Pointing out that there had been a trend to earn publicity through politician bashing, the Congress leader said: "But one should not forget that it is temporary. Where are those election commissioners (JM) Lyngdoh and (TN) Seshan now?"

Referring to the president's disparaging comment about politicians, he said: "What does he want? Army rule? When you make general comments, you do not make any distinction between Pappu Yadav (the RJD MP accused of murder) and Manmohan Singh."

Senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan agreed with Kalam's views on politicians, but said Kalam's comments were probably the result of "the disappointment he was harbouring" after the Congress-led ruling alliance and Left refused to support him for a second tenure in office.

"He is correct. Unfortunately people who are occupying high offices in ruling establishment, by and large, are with small minds, materialistic desires and without principles," Bhushan told IANS.

"It could be a general statement, but it includes Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Congress president Sonia Gandhi, because they are the leaders."

According to Bhushan, the judiciary also suffers a shortage of leaders with nobility.

Kalam, who has been voted as the first choice for the president's post in numerous SMS surveys and electronic media polls, has been rejected by United Progressive Alliance (UPA) and its Left allies citing past precedent. No one but the first President Rajendra Prasad has had a second tenure in office. 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Nelson Lewis, Kingdom of Bahrain

    Thu, Jul 12 2007

    Irrespective of Seshadri Chari's position in the Bharatiya Janata Party, I wonder how many people know him. Is he known to a humble villager, small town dweller or even a denizen of a metropolis? I wonder. The people that know him will obviously be from his party who have an axe to grind and some well-informed outsiders, though for all the wrong reasons.

    I have never heard of him before, nor am I interested in knowing him because he will be another stereotype neta. You know what I mean? Certainly, he is no Dalai Lama or Mother Teresa. If many of the ruling Chief Ministers of the States in the Indian Union have not endeared themselves to the populace, then who will know this Seshadri Chari. He just one more "Aya Ram, Gaya Ram", unless he wants to impress everyone with some Lalu Yadav antics and theatrics.

    A few years down the line, this person may be totally forgotten by the few that know him, but personalities like President A.P.J. Kalam, Election Commissioners T.N. Seshan will always be remembered for all the right reasons and their humble contributions to society will be acknowledged.

    President Kalam has every right to say, "society was going through unique dynamics due to the shortage of leadership with nobility." And he is also right in saying that, "It is said that a nation fails not because of economic progress but because of an increase in decision makers with small minds." I agree with the views of the senior lawyer, Prashant Bhushan.

    The Courts are the only last resort left to the people, because you just cannot trust these bunch of politicians and hardly any distinctions can be made between them, because there are just a few honest politicians who can be trusted and counted on one's finger tips.

    The few that I can recollect from the contemporary politicians are Dr. Karan Singh, A.K. Anthony, George Fernandes, whereas the honesty, proprietary and integrity of other netas are highly debatable. I would not trust them as far as I can sneeze.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Alfred J. Rebello, Kundapur/Dubai

    Wed, Jul 11 2007

    An old saying 'everybody like to hear about others and not the self'. This is the similar case. Nobody likes to hear the truth about them. President is correct, now a days every one has to go to court to seek justice though I am not sure one will come out with 100% justice.

    Perhaps our politicians are thinking about the survival of justice department and therefore leave everything to the justice department because if they solve all the problems by themselves then there is no need of courts, judges, lawyers etc. and this may result many lose their jobs. With regard to the word used by president 'nobility', president Kalam was slightly mistaken, as we all know how noble our politicians are when it comes to their own benefit.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: News headlines



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.