New Delhi, Dec 15 (Reuters): Global pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson knew for decades that its baby powder contained asbestos, Reuters said in a report on Friday. The Reuters investigation comes in the backdrop of the multiple lawsuits that the company is currently facing — where more than 9,000 plaintiffs have alleged that its talc baby powder products contain asbestos and caused ovarian and other cancers. In a major setback to the company, St. Louis jury in July had awarded nearly $4.7 billion in total damages to 22 women and their families after they claimed asbestos in Johnson & Johnson talcum powder contributed to their ovarian cancer in the first case against the company that focused on asbestos in the powder.
The jury had announced the $4.14 billion award in punitive damages shortly after awarding $550 million in compensatory damages after a six-week trial in St. Louis Circuit Court. J&J had vowed to file an appeal against its verdict.
An investigation conducted by Reuters, said that, based on examination of documents, deposition and trial testimony — shows that “from at least 1971 to the early 2000s, the company’s raw talc and finished powders sometimes tested positive for small amounts of asbestos, and that company executives, mine managers, scientists, doctors and lawyers fretted over the problem and how to address it while failing to disclose it to regulators or the public.”
The documents also depict successful efforts to influence US regulators’ plans to limit asbestos in cosmetic talc products and scientific research on the health effects of talc, the report states.
The report also states that J&J denied the claim. Baby powder was asbestos-free, the company states according to the report.
“Plaintiffs’ attorneys out for personal financial gain are distorting historical documents and intentionally creating confusion in the courtroom and in the media,” Ernie Knewitz, J&J’s vice president of global media relations, wrote in an emailed response to Reuters’ findings. “This is all a calculated attempt to distract from the fact that thousands of independent tests prove our talc does not contain asbestos or cause cancer. Any suggestion that Johnson & Johnson knew or hid information about the safety of talc is false.”
Shares of Johnson & Johnson tumbled 12 per cent on Friday by 1714 GMT.
Comment on this article
Rudolf Rodrigues, Mumbai
Sat, Dec 15 2018DePuy a subsidiary of J&J too almost killed many patients by supplying faulty hip implants; a class action suit filed by many patients who got crores of rupees each, but in India they only bore the cost of a new implant & surgery and no other compensation like in the USA!!
All these mnc cos manipulate R&D works and hide important information from public thus doing extreme harm!! Even research in various top universities is funded by them and manipulated!! They just want to mint money at any cost!!
DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse
HENRY MISQUITH, Bahrain
Sat, Dec 15 2018Everything is fake since 2014..
DisAgree [5] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse
Sudhakar, Kallianpur
Sat, Dec 15 2018Just now I came to know that Johnson and Johnson established in 2014!!!
DisAgree Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse
G R PRABHUJI, Mangalore
Sat, Dec 15 2018Every where people want to make easy money. Nobody is bothered about the health. Money money money.
DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse
Karthik, Konaje /Navi Mumbai
Sat, Dec 15 2018Time for Pathanjali to rise to the occasion.
DisAgree [7] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse
Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai
Sat, Dec 15 2018Pathanjali will use Cow Bone Powder ...
DisAgree [10] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse
Lobo, Mangalore
Sat, Dec 15 2018Are you anti swadeshi ( indigenous), I think you have psychological disorder and some phobia. Get treated by a good doctor.
DisAgree [5] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse
Jenifer, Mangalore
Sat, Dec 15 2018Apparently you are allergic to Saldhanhas. Please adopt a name that is compatible - two members of similar community don't argue about swadeshi-videshi, they coordinate and more on. Unlike two members of same community fight over a place of worship and poison the worshipers.
DisAgree [2] Agree [1] Report Abuse