Hijab petitioners bat on Article 21 v/s public order, hearing tomorrow


Bengaluru, Feb 14 (IANS): The government can't restrict fundamental rights in the garb of maintaining public order, the counsel for the girl students seeking permission to wear the hijab told the Karnataka High Court on Monday, February 14. The counsel for the petioners put forth this argument before the hearing was adjourned till Tuesday, February 15.

Senior advocate Devdatt Kamat further told the bench of Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice Khaji Jaibunnesa Mohiyuddin that the College Development Committee (CDC) has no legal statutory basis to frame rules on uniforms.

"The government's decision in this regard shows lack of wisdom and a legislator heading the committee will decide on fundamental rights. It is not legal to restrict the wearing of hijab," he argued.

Kamat stated that all Central schools run by the Central government are allowing the wearing of hijab and petitioners have been wearing hijab of the same colour as the uniform since long.

"The state has made a fatal error while referring to public order in its circular. There is not even mention of Article 21 in the quoted order by the government on the basis of which the circular restricting hijab is issued," he said.

He maintained that the state is an outsider when it comes to the point of belief, though it seems regressive to others. Authorising college committees is equal to making mockery of the fundamental rights, he said, while maintaining that maintaining public order is an enshrined responsibility of the state and it can't deny rights and say because certain acts incites violence, they are restricting students from wearing hijab.

Advocate Kamat pleaded that the bench should order permitting students to wear hijab of the same color of the uniform.

The bench had last week given an interim order that no religious symbols are allowed for the students in schools and colleges until the final order of the court, thus barring use of both hijab and saffron shawls in the school and college premises.

However, petitioners moved the Supreme Court challenging the interim order but it had rejected the demand of urgent hearing by petitioners and said that it will only interfere at an appropriate time. The state government has resumed function of schools till Class 10 and is expected to take call on reopening colleges soon.

The hijab row which started last month in Udupi Pre-University College by six girl students, has snowballed into a major crisis in the state and has hit international attention too. The bench had asked the media not to publish passing remarks and arguments by the counsel until the final order is issued on the matter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • RK, mangalore / doha

    Tue, Feb 15 2022

    Kesari just came now for no reason, head scarf was from loong time. simply for the vote bank they are doing these drama after election everything will be normal.

    DisAgree [13] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • real kujuma, kodial

    Tue, Feb 15 2022

    Good going....lage raho...secular India will definitely approve wearing of Hijab...only saffron party has issues.

    DisAgree [29] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • matt, mangalore

    Tue, Feb 15 2022

    The Nation is more important than religion says Tamilnadu HC which makes sense, The advocate D Kamath Quates verse from Quran says that no woman will expose her neckline to anybody other than her husband. Here are a few more verses. Quran 2:191-Slay the unbelievers Quran 3:85- Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable. and there are many more like this with harsher language. If this is the fundamental right of a worshiper then where do we stand?. This is going to open Pandora's box. If One religion's fundamental rights go against the other religion. what are the solutions? I feel this is unfortunate and was not right on his part to bring this up. I feel India is a secular country and not a religious country and we need a common civil code.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • David Pais, Mangalore

    Mon, Feb 14 2022

    hijab, burqa, saffron shawls r unnecessarily brought 2 propagate religion & 2 create vote bank. uniforms is da best solution 2 students.

    DisAgree [27] Agree [61] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sma, Bengaluru

    Tue, Feb 15 2022

    Pls tell the students not to wear kesari strings on the wrist

    DisAgree [12] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Raheja Waterfront

    Mon, Feb 14 2022

    A School prescribes a School Uniform to let the students know that all of them are Equal ...

    DisAgree [11] Agree [74] Reply Report Abuse

  • John Tauro, M'lore

    Tue, Feb 15 2022

    Exactly! Uniform denotes equality among students. Equality and Secularism go hand in hand.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Moshu, Mangaluru

    Mon, Feb 14 2022

    Positive indications with valid points . Hope justice will prevail accordingly.

    DisAgree [46] Agree [27] Reply Report Abuse

  • Aadil, Mysore

    Mon, Feb 14 2022

    Good move. Let us hope a permanent solution to this trivial matter is resolved and thereby, a friendly atmosphere between Hindu and Muslim brothers is re-established. End of the day, we are all Indians. Mera Bharat Mahaan.

    DisAgree [8] Agree [54] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Hijab petitioners bat on Article 21 v/s public order, hearing tomorrow



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.