Will State-gifted Cash-flow Disrupt Families?

June 3, 2023

The bond that links your true family is not one of blood, but of respect and joy in each other's life.” --Richard Bach (b.1936), an American writer of numerous works of fiction and non-fiction.

The male dominance in Indian households had been traditionally accepted. But, with brides getting educated and employed and bringing loads of dowry to the marriage table, there is an open question as to who is the boss in the household. But, as that question is still alive, a new element on the scene is introduced in Karnataka (and announced on 2/6/23) and there is going to be some drama involving mother-in-law and daughter(s)-in law as reflected in The Times of India report dated May 31, 2023 and excerpted below.

Who’s the woman head of the family? Atthe (mother-in-law), Sose (daughter-in law) may fight over ?2,000 (per month) incentive

Belagavi/Bengaluru: The proposed implementation of the state government's ‘Gruha Lakshmi’ scheme, offering a monthly subvention of Rs 2,000, is said to have inadvertently sparked conflicts between ‘atthe’ and ‘sose’ in several households.

Instances of disputes between saas-bahu have begun to surface as family members argue over who should receive the monthly cash incentive. The lack of clear eligibility criteria in the Congress’ election manifesto, where they pledged to grant the monthly subsidy to the woman head of the family, has further contributed to the confusion among households.

On Tuesday (30/5/23), when women and child development minister Laxmi Hebbalkar was queried on the issue, she said it’s a decision for the family to take. But later clarified that the money should ideally go to the mother-in-law as she is considered the female head as per Indian tradition. “She can share the money with the daughter-in-law, if she wishes,” Hebbalkar added.

Public works department minister Satish Jarkiholi also concurred with Hebbalkar, saying the money should go to the mother-in-law as she is the head of the family.

Women activists felt the grant should be shared between the mother-in-law and daughter-in-law if there is no consensus on who is the female head of the family. “This way there won’t be problems in the family,” said C Nagaratna, a woman activist.

“It is very difficult to take sides on this issue. The government should give money to both mother-in-law and daughter-in-law,” said Kavitha D, another activist.

Hebbalkar said it is too early to talk about terms and conditions in the implementation of the scheme, as the department has yet to discuss the modalities. “Some clarity will emerge after Thursday’s cabinet meeting,’’ she added.

Tale-piece

It is traditionally accepted that the husband is the Lord in his house. But, even before education and female advancement came on the scene, some men were under the thumb of their wives. But the daily climax was in the bedroom of the couple, apparently not to scandalize their family members, especially children. They could hear the goings-in the bedroom and dominant voice was of the man who, after suffering the onslaught of his violent wife would say loudly: “Is that enough for you today?” Nightly drama over, they, mainly children, went to bed dreaming of their turn after marriage.

 

Also read:

 

 

 

By John B Monteiro
To submit your article / poem / short story to Daijiworld, please email it to news@daijiworld.com mentioning 'Article/poem submission for daijiworld' in the subject line. Please note the following:

  • The article / poem / short story should be original and previously unpublished in other websites except in the personal blog of the author. We will cross-check the originality of the article, and if found to be copied from another source in whole or in parts without appropriate acknowledgment, the submission will be rejected.
  • The author of the poem / article / short story should include a brief self-introduction limited to 500 characters and his/her recent picture (optional). Pictures relevant to the article may also be sent (optional), provided they are not bound by copyright. Travelogues should be sent along with relevant pictures not sourced from the Internet. Travelogues without relevant pictures will be rejected.
  • In case of a short story / article, the write-up should be at least one-and-a-half pages in word document in Times New Roman font 12 (or, about 700-800 words). Contributors are requested to keep their write-ups limited to a maximum of four pages. Longer write-ups may be sent in parts to publish in installments. Each installment should be sent within a week of the previous installment. A single poem sent for publication should be at least 3/4th of a page in length. Multiple short poems may be submitted for single publication.
  • All submissions should be in Microsoft Word format or text file. Pictures should not be larger than 1000 pixels in width, and of good resolution. Pictures should be attached separately in the mail and may be numbered if the author wants them to be placed in order.
  • Submission of the article / poem / short story does not automatically entail that it would be published. Daijiworld editors will examine each submission and decide on its acceptance/rejection purely based on merit.
  • Daijiworld reserves the right to edit the submission if necessary for grammar and spelling, without compromising on the author's tone and message.
  • Daijiworld reserves the right to reject submissions without prior notice. Mails/calls on the status of the submission will not be entertained. Contributors are requested to be patient.
  • The article / poem / short story should not be targeted directly or indirectly at any individual/group/community. Daijiworld will not assume responsibility for factual errors in the submission.
  • Once accepted, the article / poem / short story will be published as and when we have space. Publication may take up to four weeks from the date of submission of the write-up, depending on the number of submissions we receive. No author will be published twice in succession or twice within a fortnight.
  • Time-bound articles (example, on Mother's Day) should be sent at least a week in advance. Please specify the occasion as well as the date on which you would like it published while sending the write-up.

Comment on this article

  • mohan prabhu, mangalore/canada

    Mon, Jun 05 2023

    This is further to my earlier comment. You may perhaps know that there was (may still exist) a system of inheritance where the woman is the head of the family and the property goes to the females. The husband , though the father of the children, is considered as a "visitor" and his property does not go to his children, male or female, but to his sister's. This was called MARUMAKKATAYAM system. It was the system especially among the Malabaris, as I remember from my Hindu Law classes at the School of Oriental and African Studies, London (England). Perhaps this system is now obsolete. In such a system, women's rights of property are predominant and they are the head of the household as it is run by them. The senior-most mata (matriarch) is the one to whom the bonanza from the Siddu Government should go.

  • Gautam Das, Bangalore

    Sun, Jun 04 2023

    The govt sponsored incentive for women should be given to the woman who owns the house or her husband or both jointly and the house registered in the name/ names.

  • Stany Jovin Menezes, Muscat

    Sun, Jun 04 2023

    To ensure clarity regarding eligibility for the ₹2,000 incentive, it is important for the government to clearly define the eligible recipients. If the intention is to provide the incentive to the woman head of the family, the government should establish specific criteria to determine the head of the household. Such clarity would help prevent any potential disputes among family members.

  • mohan prabhu, mangalore/canada

    Sat, Jun 03 2023

    Who will disentangle this double-headed monster? If it is a joint famil y, it is clear; the mother-in-law isthe head (father-in-law, only in name - naamkavaste); but in a nclear family, which is run by the man's wife,no by his mother, the wife would be de facto and de jure (by law) the head and the husband's mother is a dependant, She might indeed have her own means, even wealth, far outstripping that of her son - left for her by her deceased husband. Oh , what a nightmare for Siddu and Shiva!

  • Bengalurian, Bengaluru

    Sat, Jun 03 2023

    So, what do YOU suggest? Forget what TOI or Anjali Nimbalkar say or suggest. It is well-known that husband is generally considered the bread-winner but may not be necessarily running the household and handling the chores, including buying groceries, vegetables, fish or meat etc. True, there are large number of women who manage their houses on their own and in some casees, earn much more than the husband. But as for running the house, it is generally considered the responsibility of the wife. In some cases, the mother in law may be handling it but generally it is the daughter in law, because she is younger and much more smarter and better educated, who is the real BOSS of the house. TOI atthe-sose tussle is rubbish.


Leave a Comment

Title: Will State-gifted Cash-flow Disrupt Families?



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.