POCSO Act will prevail over Mohammedan law, rules Karnataka high court


Bengaluru, Nov 1 (IANS): The Karnataka High Court has held that the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) and IPC Acts are substantive and prevail over personal laws.

A bench headed by Justice Rajendra Badamikar made the observation recently while looking into the bail petition of a 19-year-old rape-accused from Chikkamagaluru.

The accused had lured a 16-year-old girl to a lodge and committed forcible sexual assault.

Setting aside arguments that the Mohammedan law specifies normal puberty age as 15 years and it is considered the age of marriage also, the bench stated that POCSO and IPC acts are supreme and overrides personal laws.

It was also argued that since the accused is a Muslim, there is no jurisdiction of the POCSO act against him.

The bench remarked that under the guise of personal law, the petitioner can't be granted bail.

The court rejected the bail even as a charge sheet was submitted in the case by saying that there is a chance of tampering with evidence.

In another case, the same bench set aside the arguments seeking bail under the Mohammedan law, and granted bail to the accused on humanitarian grounds.

The man was booked under POCSO Act after his 17-year-old wife was found to be pregnant. The husband's counsel argued that since he had got married under the Mohammedan law, the POCSO charges against him should be dropped.

Though the bench disapproved of the argument, granted him bail considering the fact that the pregnant minor girl could be taken care by the accused husband.

 

 

 

 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • mohan prabhu, mangalore/canada

    Tue, Nov 01 2022

    what if the boy were younger than the girl, and marries her under Mohammadan law? Does POSCO become pusku?

    DisAgree [3] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Samad, udupi

    Tue, Nov 01 2022

    If lawyer make wrong argument on criminal offense upon his own knowledge, why it has to be linked religion. Criminal has to be punished upon guilty and punishment goes irrespective which religion he belongs to.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Dev, Mangalore

    Tue, Nov 01 2022

    Good judgement taking away one more loophole in immoral personal law. Sharia is always biased against women as it was based on medeival times when women were considered just like an asset.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [26] Reply Report Abuse

  • Arjun, India

    Tue, Nov 01 2022

    Any Indian law should prevail over all religious laws....make it a law

    DisAgree [3] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shakeel, Bangalore

    Tue, Nov 01 2022

    Lured the 16-year-old girl is unacceptable, she is also equally responsible. How come he booked a room in the lodge. What responsibility the manager of the lodge has in this situation. It seems to be consentual act which was has gone wrong. He should be immediately given bail and tried for consentual sex. A 16-year-old girl is more mature than a 19-year-old boy.

    DisAgree [44] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ajay, Mangalore

    Tue, Nov 01 2022

    Who told you a 16 year old girl is mature enough to take right decisons? She was tricked and lured, she trusted the man. The whole mohammads law should be considered invalid.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sainik, Mangalore

    Tue, Nov 01 2022

    What an IRONY!! Rapists wants to follow mohammadian law ?

    DisAgree [2] Agree [40] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jafer, Mangalore

    Tue, Nov 01 2022

    Sexual offence is criminal act comes under Criminal law which is same for all nothing to do with Personal law.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [30] Reply Report Abuse

  • RANGA, MANGALORE

    Tue, Nov 01 2022

    ..It was also argued that since the accused is a Muslim, there is no jurisdiction of the POCSO act against him...well, what to say..i wish this case go to SC and a judgement pass to cover all state..

    DisAgree [1] Agree [33] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: POCSO Act will prevail over Mohammedan law, rules Karnataka high court



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.