'Are women incapable of spirituality?' questions SC on Sabarimala ban


New Delhi, Feb 12 (NDTV): Kerala's Sabarimala temple's ban on women was questioned today by the Supreme Court, which said that Hindu scriptures Vedas and Upanishads do not discriminate between men and women.

"In the Vedas, Upanishads or scriptures there is no discrimination between and men and women. This has cropped up historically," the court said.

"Is spirituality a domain of only men? Are women incapable of spirituality?"

The court is hearing a petition challenging the ban on women between 10 and 50 entering the ancient temple dedicated to Lord Ayyappa.

"We are not taking a narrow view. We want to strike a constitutional balance between the right to equality and the right to religious practice. The temple is a religious phenomenon and its functions must come within parameters," the court said.

The temple board lawyer KK Venugopal argued, the practice was in place for 1000 years, so why dig it up now? "The whole of Sabarimala hill is sanctified and women can't enter," he said. The temple claims that women who menstruate are impure and must not be given access to the hilltop shrine.

The court asked the temple board and the state government to give details on when the discrimination began at the temple and the historical reasons.

"This discrimination will be tested on the parameters of constitutional equality and right to custom and religious practices," the court said.

The temple has six weeks to respond.

In November, the head of the temple's board, Prayar Gopalakrishnan, created a huge controversy by stating that women would be able to access the temple after a machine is created that would function like a body scanner to determine which women were "pure" enough to make the cut.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Promenade Road,Frazer Town,B'lore

    Sun, Feb 14 2016

    Very sensitive issue and better courts if possible interfere less instead allow to continue the long customs

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sat, Feb 13 2016

    My sincere advise to all Religious Heads - Do not make a fool of yourselves ...

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Cynthia, Moodbidri

    Fri, Feb 12 2016

    Gods darshan or worshipping at the temple is the very basic right of a human. Since 1000 years woman was barred , then this culture has no science. Now don't tell me why American president is not women yet or the pope? These are high profile posts, needs to be very strong physically and mentally to make the tough decisions, Where woman known to be a emotional person

    DisAgree [13] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • HENRY MISQUITH, Bahrain

    Fri, Feb 12 2016

    This type of discrimination in all religions is man-made, not God made.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • VINCY, Bangkok

    Fri, Feb 12 2016

    How funny is this. The mother who give birth to the high priest is treated as impure by her own son.
    How silly to call a mother as impure.What religion is this?

    DisAgree [6] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Fri, Feb 12 2016

    SC is India's last resort ...

    DisAgree [4] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • A. S. Mathew, U.S.A.

    Fri, Feb 12 2016

    Well, the religious scriptures are not applicable in the religions, but the religious hierarchy and the politicians make their own religious interpretation to rule other people.

    Hindu scriptures never tells in any place that eating beef is a sin, but promoting since Brahama has created the eatable animals for human consumption however the current politicians have d their own version of Hinduism and beef eating can be very dangerous in India now.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: 'Are women incapable of spirituality?' questions SC on Sabarimala ban



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.