M'lore: Proposed Legal Practitioners Act - 2010 will Curtail Power – Bar Council


M'lore: Proposed Legal Practitioners Act - 2010 will Curtail Power – Bar Council

Pics: Dayanand Kukkaje
Daijiworld Media Network – Mangalore (VA)

Mangalore, Mar 24: The advocates across all the courts in the state on Thursday March 24 protested against the Legal Practitioners (Regulations and Maintenance etc) Act, 2010 proposed to be passed by the central government.


The lawyers demanded that the bill should never be moved in the Lok Sabha, and it should be immediately withdrawn.

The proposal to give absolute powers to take action against the lawyers to retired judges is anti-constitutional. This will force the lawyers to always work under a sense of fear about the judges. The
proposed law is detrimental to the system of delivery of justice, they complained.

Vice-chairman of Karnataka State Bar Council, P P Hegde, “At present, total control and absolute power to hold disciplinary proceedings against the lawyers vests with the Bar Council, which is elected by the advocates themselves.

“None of the courts have this power. As a result, the lawyers have been able to function independently. Bar Associations all over the country have been fighting against corrupt judicial officers. The new law proposes to arm the High Courts and tribunals having retired judges of the district courts as members, with powers to examine complaints and punish advocates facing complaints of wrongdoing. As per the new law, if any of the litigants complains against the use of powers by the Bar Council, the Consumers Tribunal has been given the power to hold inquiry and take disciplinary against the concerned lawyers, Hegde explained.

The advocates will also submit memorandums to the respective deputy commissioner, Chief Minister, and union minister for law demanding the same.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Tom Cat , Mangalore/ Saudi Arabia

    Fri, Mar 25 2011

    Liars, Lairs, Lairs 99% of them the 1% who work honestly are choked by these lairs.Recently it took me three months searching for one honest lawyer, most of them are interested in money not the cases of the litigants.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Dinesh, Bangalore

    Thu, Mar 24 2011

    For 1 cheque bounce case they takes 5 years & 2 judges but the cleint do not get verdict in local (Sullia) court> I asking with all the lawyers how many years takes to enter same matter at High court or Supreme court protest against section 138. U people know the truth. This is national shame

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • John Dsouza , Chickmagalur

    Thu, Mar 24 2011

    Advocates and Judges , must not be feared if , they work for the right cause and towards Justice, in other simple words, advocates & Judges are to prove that Right is Right and Wrong is Wrong. Then no fear.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Dexter, Mangalore

    Thu, Mar 24 2011

    There are the Kala Cotes. Fighters for Justice and injustice, defenders of the rich, oppressers of the poor say Legal Practitioners Act 2010 is Anti Lawyers.
    You Liers.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Robin, Bangalore

    Thu, Mar 24 2011

    It is OK. But how long you will mislead people and misguide people ? Instead of arguing for the people you are giving your ideas to win. Without being in the place of incident, without knowing the background personally you have the right to argue about the matter.

    Terrible problems of others in life or death is your livelihood... To lead a smooth life to you all AD(VERSE)VOCATES, that many cases should come monthly or yearly. Never the cases become empty in courts in your life time. You lucky people.

    So you expect nobody should touch your business in the name of truth extraction.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: M'lore: Proposed Legal Practitioners Act - 2010 will Curtail Power – Bar Council



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.