Chidambaram's filing plea in SC will set bad precedent: CBI


New Delhi, Sep 3 (IANS) The CBI on Tuesday urged the Supreme Court not to entertain former Finance Minister P Chidambaram's petition against remand orders directly, as it would set a bad precedent.

The CBI, in an affidavit filed in the apex court, said: "Entertaining of a petition under Article 136 of the Constitution directly against an order of remand passed by the competent court (in this trial court) in exercise of discretionary jurisdiction under Section 167 of the (Criminal Procedure) Code would set a bad precedent."

A bench headed by Justice R. Banumathi is hearing Chidambaram's petition against the arrest warrants and the custodial remand ordered by the trial court. 



The investigation agency asked the apex court if it would henceforth allow all the litigants to challenge their remand orders directly in the Supreme Court, instead of moving the designated High Court and the trial court conducting the regular hearing. 

In fact, Justice Banumathi had told Chidambaram's lawyer on Monday that it not appropriate to skip the jurisdiction of the High Court and the trial court concerned.

"There are no extraordinary or grave circumstances which justifies the petitioner to bypass the statutory remedies which are restored to all citizens challenging the order of remand," the agency said in its affidavit. 

The CBI also said that even high courts usually do not interfere when the special designated court, after an elaborate and length hearing, pass a detailed order exercising its judicial discretion.

Chidambaram's petition is bereft of merit and hence warrants no intervention by the apex court, and the court should dismiss it, the CBI added.

Earlier, during the day, the Supreme Court said that Chidambaram will remain in the CBI custody till September 5 despite the investigating agency informing the court that it does not want to question him further. 

Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Chidambaram, assured the court that they will not press for his interim bail in the trial court till Thursday.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the top court that the agency does not want further custodial interrogation of Chidambaram and the judiciary must allow the law to take its own course. The submission indicated that Chidambaram should be sent to Tihar Jail under judicial custody. 

The former minister on Monday had insisted that the court not send him to judicial custody. Mehta requested the top court not to regulate proceedings pending before the trial court. However, the top court ordered to maintain status quo in the INX media case. 

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • ad, mangaluru

    Tue, Sep 03 2019

    Who is paying CBI for the witch hunt?

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Roshan, Mangaluru

    Tue, Sep 03 2019

    With pathetic or zero conviction rates, CBI is already has the distinction of called a parrot. With more or less people seeing it as dabang gang, it's lost its credibility. CBI itself says it has nothing more to question Mr.Chidambarum, yet it wants him under arrest.

    It is making a joke of itself but a scary judiciary could find few words to question or call it in any name.

    India is changing with institutional changes, that seem to be carrying destructive virus that affects the roots of this great nation, that stood proudly all through history.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [12] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Nashville

    Tue, Sep 03 2019

    What are the Charges ...

    DisAgree [3] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jai India, Mangalore

    Tue, Sep 03 2019

    Then what is use of the court where a victim, accused, defendant is not given his rightful chance to file his plea and speak in his defence. CBI is mulling to do Mob Lynching in the court like it happens in the streets by BJP rowdies.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Chidambaram's filing plea in SC will set bad precedent: CBI



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.