Karnataka HC calls demonetisation laudable; dismisses petition


New Delhi, Dec 8 (PTI): Dismissing the petition against demonetisation, Karnataka High Court has upheld certain restrictions that accompanied the decision saying they are matters for central government and RBI to decide.

In his order, Justice Ashok B Hinchigeri observed that "laudable objectives" to tackle the menaces of fake currency notes, black money and terrorism cannot be achieved without imposing restrictions.

"...but in a situation of this nature, no directions, much less time-bound directions, can be given to the government of India and the RBI," he said.

The order was issued by the Karnataka High Court in a writ petition seeking removal of cap on withdrawal imposed by government and RBI following demonetisation of Rs 500/1000 currency notes effective November 9.

"In the larger interests of the society, when a comprehensive mission is being accomplished, certain regulatory measures during the period of transition are bound to affect the interests of some sections of people," the order said.

"There cannot be any dispute that the collateral damage, if any on any section is to be minimised, if it cannot be avoided. What steps are to be taken, are the matters for the central government and RBI to decide," it added.

Observing that the menaces of black money, fake currency and terrorism are "hydra-headed monsters", the order said, "when one head of the monster is chopped off, it would raise its other ugly heads. Stamping them out is indeed a herculean task."
The order dated December 6 also noted that it is impossible for any policy maker to anticipate all the difficulties and contingencies.

"As and when the difficulties are noticed in the course of implementing the policy, the necessary remedial measures have to be taken," it said.

The administrators and legislators are entitled to frame policies and take such administrative decisions, as they think necessary in the public interest.
"The courts should not ordinarily interfere with the policy decisions unless they are manifestly illegal and arbitrary," the Judge observed.

The order recorded that the petitioners' appreciation of demonetisation policy is discernible and it is a major initiative to eradicate black money.

"While petitioners welcomed the scheme of demonetisation, their only grievance is over the limitation imposed on withdrawing the amount from the banks," it said.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • JR,

    Fri, Dec 09 2016

    GOVT. NEED NOT ANSWER TO ANYBODY BUT TO THE POSSIBLE EXTENT AVOIDED PUBLIC INCONVENIENCE IF NOT 100%.
    ONE MORE THING DEMONITISATION NEED NOT SOLVE 100% BUT IF IT IS 10% IT IS SOME HOW OK BECAUSE EARLIER GOVT. SHOULD HAVE DONE IT IN A GAP OF 10-20 YEARS BUT NOW IT IS ALMOST SINCE 38 YEARS AND WE CANNOT EXPECT A MAGIC TO HAPPEN INSTANTLY.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Peter , Bangalore

    Fri, Dec 09 2016

    There are 3 different things 1. Black money 2. Black Wealth 3. Black Source.
    Demonitisation might remove few percentage of Black money but what about Black Wealth and Black source ?
    Is there answer from Govt?

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Alwyn, Mangalore

    Thu, Dec 08 2016

    First of all many citizens they do not know what is Black Money. It is not only rich people who has the black money.

    Black money is money which is earned through any illegal activity controlled by country regulations. Black money proceeds are usually received in cash from underground economic activity and, as such, is not taxed. Recipients of black money must hide it, spend it only in the underground economy, or attempt to give it the appearance of legitimacy through money laundering.

    In India, black money refers to funds earned on the black market, on which income and other taxes have not been paid.

    In this case if anyone spend even a Rupee must pay tax and obtain receipt. Same way every one must pay tax for earning as per the bracket. In India including me every one have black money even beggars because they do NOT declare  their income. So there no use going to court or Modi, it is we every citizen of India must accept the right way.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • D.Shetty, Mangalore / Bahrain

    Thu, Dec 08 2016

    Its really pity that people still think they can roll back the decision of Demonetization.. SC ,HC knows that this decision was approved by President so even courts have no authority.. Opposition is wasting time and unnecessary nautanki ..

    DisAgree [23] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • Gangaram, Moodbidri

    Thu, Dec 08 2016

    Read properly one more time, pitioner not asking to rollback but asking for the withdrawal of cap, where as our own money we cannot withdraw as much we wanted.

    DisAgree [13] Agree [29] Reply Report Abuse

  • Michael Noronha, Mysore

    Thu, Dec 08 2016

    No one disputes that demonetisation to corner black money hoarders is very much laudable. But to brand the entire population as corrupt and subject them to such hardship with no one to turn to is what is hurting the citizens of India. Lack of preparation to overcome the currency shortage is what hurts the citizens. With 11.55 lac crore currency inthe denomination of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 returned to RBI and just Rs 3.81 lac new currency being issued as per RBI Statistics the lack of preparation, long queues before ATMs is glaring. If every one turns a blind eye then as the SC said there will be riots.

    DisAgree [15] Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Thu, Dec 08 2016

    Many people have yet to feel the pain ...

    DisAgree [25] Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • sri, Karkala

    Thu, Dec 08 2016

    Please elaborate...

    DisAgree [7] Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • H.DSOUZA, KODAGU / MANGALORE

    Thu, Dec 08 2016

    LABOUR...

    DisAgree [2] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Karnataka HC calls demonetisation laudable; dismisses petition



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.