Daijiworld Media Network – Bengaluru
Bengaluru, Sep 20: As controversy deepens around alleged mass burials in Dharmasthala linked to the long-standing Sowjanya rape and murder case, two significant developments have emerged. A complaint has been filed against the victim’s uncle for allegedly spreading misinformation and fuelling conspiracy theories, while the Karnataka high court has ordered petitioners to independently submit any evidence they claim to hold regarding burial sites.
In a fresh twist to the 2012 Sowjanya case, Sandeep Rai, a resident of Dharmasthala village, has filed a complaint with the Special Investigation Team (SIT) against Vittal Gowda, Sowjanya’s uncle, for allegedly making unsubstantiated claims about human remains being found at Banglegudde, a site currently under investigation.

Rai accused Gowda of deliberately spreading ‘sensational and misleading’ information that, he claimed, threatens to undermine the spiritual sanctity of Shree Kshetra Dharmasthala. “Instead of devotion, social media is now flooded with talk of skeletons, crimes, and conspiracies,” the complaint reads. “The peace and holiness of Dharmasthala is being compromised.”
According to Rai, Gowda participated in two site inspections (mahazar) with the SIT at Banglegudde and later gave an interview to the Kudla Rampage YouTube channel, wherein he claimed that a 45-year-old witness-complainant had contacted him as recently as 2023.
Rai further alleged that Gowda had visited the area earlier, witnessed human remains, and failed to report this to authorities. “He says he recorded videos and even personally brought skulls from the site, yet none of this was shared with the police. Who guided him, and what was his motive?” Rai questioned.
“These actions indicate either involvement in the crimes or participation in a larger conspiracy aimed at discrediting Dharmasthala,” the complaint claims. Rai also requested the SIT to probe Gowda’s links with the complainant and others including Girish Mattannavar, Mahesh Shetty Thimarodi, Jayant T, and the media platform involved.
Meanwhile, the Karnataka High Court has directed two petitioners—Purandara Gowda and Tukaram Gowda—to present any independently obtained information regarding suspected grave sites in Dharmasthala to the court by September 26.
Justice M Nagaprasanna issued the order after hearing arguments from senior counsel Deepak Khosla, who appeared on behalf of the petitioners, and special public prosecutor (SPP) B N Jagadeesh.
Khosla argued that his clients possess knowledge of burial locations beyond the 14 already revealed by the original complainant, a sanitation worker who has since been named an accused. Due to fears of evidence tampering, Khosla said the petitioners refrained from publicly disclosing these sites and were willing to submit the information directly to the court.
In response, SPP Jagadeesh informed the court that 13 out of 14 disclosed sites had already been excavated, and a skull initially believed to be female was recovered—but forensic analysis confirmed it to be male. “The investigation shows the complainant’s statements were misleading,” Jagadeesh said.
Expressing concern over delays in recording the complainant’s statement, the court asked whether there was a conspiracy behind the entire sequence of events. The SPP was instructed to investigate potential ulterior motives and report back.
- Dharmasthala case: ID card hints at missing Kodagu man; SIT recovers 7 skulls in 2-day search
- Dharmasthala case: SIT finds human bones in Banglegudde forest
- Dharmasthala case: SIT gets over 30 plaints amid claims of murder, cover-up and likely exhumations
- Dharmasthala mass burial case: Thimarody flags 4 suspected murders to SIT; human remains found
- SIT revisits Dharmasthala burial site, skeletal remains sent for forensic tests
- New evidence emerges in Dharmasthala case: Original video shows remains hauled from forest
- Dharmasthala murder probe: Villagers write to SIT, offer to reveal alleged burial sites
- Dharmasthala case: Intelligence warned of conspiracy in 2023
- Dharmasthala murder probe: Villagers write to SIT, offer to reveal alleged burial sites
- SIT steps up probe in Dharmasthala skull case, seizes hotel records linked to Chinnayya
- Dharmasthala ‘maskman’ identified as C N Chinnayya, remanded to 10-day SIT custody
- Dharmasthala ‘skull’ case takes dramatic turn; sourced from medical research centre
- Dharmasthala case: ‘Maskman’ arrested by SIT for giving false information
- Dharmasthala case: Fresh search for bones likely after FSL report
- Dharmasthala case: RTI reveals 279 bodies buried since 1987; most unclaimed, SIT probe intensifies
- SIT probe in Dharmasthala case at crucial stage; operation may conclude soon
- Dharmasthala case: Witness complainant shows new site near Kanyadi
- New witness emerges in Dharmasthala mass burial case, claims key evidence
- Dharmasthala case: SIT considering narco test on complainant? Key developments emerge
- Beltangady: SIT deploys ground penetrating radar at 13th site in Dharmasthala burial probe
- Dharmasthala grave mystery: SIT finds nothing at Ratnagiri Hill’s ‘point 16’ despite day-long dig
- Dharmasthala mass burial case: SIT begins excavation at 14th site after discovery of human remains
- Body found at new location during SIT operation in Dharmasthala case
- Dharmasthala mass burial: Fifth day search yields no remains at two new suspected sites
- Dharmasthala burial case: Skeletal remains found at sixth location
- No human remains found yet in Dharmasthala case; PAN, ATM cards recovered, probe continues
- No human remains found on Day 1 of SIT’s excavation at Dharmasthala forest site
- Exhumation begins in Dharmasthala forest in mass grave case; medical team joins SIT
- Armed security deployed at Dharmasthala as SIT identifies suspected mass burial sites in forest area
- Dharmasthala mass burials: Witness, complainant record statements as SIT begins probe
- SIT begins probe into Dharmasthala unnatural deaths; office set up in Beltangady
- SIT constituted to probe mass burial allegations, abuse cases in Dharmasthala region
- Witness may abscond after exhumation in Dharmasthala case, says DK SP
- Dharmasthala mass burials: Complainant's lawyers decry police response, demand protection, action
- Man claiming to have buried over 100 bodies near Dharmasthala appears before court
- Shocking allegation of multiple body disposals in Dharmasthala; complainant seeks protection
- Lawyers seek SP’s attention over Dharmasthala murder case; claim man identified burial spots
- Explosive letter goes viral: Alleges murders, cover-ups in Dharmasthala; claims bodies were hidden